Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Photios of Constantinople

  • Jozef Matula
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_401

Abstract

Photios, together with Arethas and Leo the Mathematician, is a representative of the “first Byzantine Renaissance” and a major figure in the transitional period of Byzantine intellectual history in the ninth and tenth centuries. He revived classical education in Byzantium, and through his activities humanism became a constitutive element of Byzantine thought. Photios’ Amphilochia (composed between 867 and 877) is one of the most important Byzantine philosophical documents, in which he deals with philosophical and theological topics. It contains the first known commentary on Aristotle’s Categories of the ninth century (qu. 137–147), in which he discusses various topics of Aristotle’s philosophy (theory of predication, the concept of substance, species and genera, categories).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Photios (1983–1988) Epistulae et Amphilochia, vols 1–6.2. Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, ed. Laourdas B, Westerink LG. Teubner, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  2. Photios (1991) Bibliothèque, 8 vols, ed. Henry R. Société d´édition Les Belles lettres, Paris, pp 1959–1977 (index by Schamp J)Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Anton JP (1994a) The Aristotelianism of Photios’ philosophical theology. In: Schrenck LP (ed) Aristotle in late antiquity. The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, pp 158–183Google Scholar
  2. Anton JP (1994b) The origins of Photios’ religious aesthetics. In: Boudouris K (ed) Philosophy and orthodoxy. International Center for Greek Philosophy, Athens, pp 18–40Google Scholar
  3. Benakis L (1978–79) Tò πρόβλημα τῶν γενικῶν ἐννοιῶν καὶ ὁ ἐννοιολογικὸς ρεαλισμὸς τῶν Βυζαντινῶν. Φιλοσοϕία 8–9:311–340Google Scholar
  4. Dvornik F (1948) The Photian schism, history and legend. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Hägg T (1975) Photios als Vermittler antiker Literatur. Pauly-Wissowa XXII/1:684–727Google Scholar
  6. Ierodiakonou K (2005) The Byzantine reception of Aristotle’s Categories. Synthesis Philosophica 20(1):7–31Google Scholar
  7. Kapriev G (2005) Philosophie in Byzanz. Königshausen & Neumann, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  8. Kustas GL (1973) Studies in Byzantine rhetoric. Patriarchikon Idryma Paterikon Meleton, ThessalonikeGoogle Scholar
  9. Lemerle P (1971) Le premier humanisme byzantin. Presses Universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Schamp J (1996a) La “localisation” chez Photios: traduction commentée de Questions à Amphilochios, 145. In: Motte A, Denooz J (eds) Aristotelica Secunda. Mélanges offerts à Christian Rutten, Centre d'Études aristotéliciennes. Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres, Université de Liège, Liège, pp 265–279Google Scholar
  11. Schamp J (1996b) Photios aristotélisant? Remarques critiques. In: Billerbeck M, Schamp J (eds) Kainotomia. Die Erneuerung der griechischen Tradition. Universitätsverlag Freiburg, Fribourg, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  12. Tatakis B (1949) La philosophie Byzantine. Presses Universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jozef Matula
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Center for Medieval and Renaissance PhilosophyPalacky UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic