Skip to main content

Photios of Constantinople

  • Reference work entry

Abstract

Photios, together with Arethas and Leo the Mathematician, is a representative of the “first Byzantine Renaissance” and a major figure in the transitional period of Byzantine intellectual history in the ninth and tenth centuries. He revived classical education in Byzantium, and through his activities humanism became a constitutive element of Byzantine thought. Photios’ Amphilochia (composed between 867 and 877) is one of the most important Byzantine philosophical documents, in which he deals with philosophical and theological topics. It contains the first known commentary on Aristotle’s Categories of the ninth century (qu. 137–147), in which he discusses various topics of Aristotle’s philosophy (theory of predication, the concept of substance, species and genera, categories).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Photios (1983–1988) Epistulae et Amphilochia, vols 1–6.2. Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, ed. Laourdas B, Westerink LG. Teubner, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Photios (1991) Bibliothèque, 8 vols, ed. Henry R. Société d´édition Les Belles lettres, Paris, pp 1959–1977 (index by Schamp J)

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Anton JP (1994a) The Aristotelianism of Photios’ philosophical theology. In: Schrenck LP (ed) Aristotle in late antiquity. The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, pp 158–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton JP (1994b) The origins of Photios’ religious aesthetics. In: Boudouris K (ed) Philosophy and orthodoxy. International Center for Greek Philosophy, Athens, pp 18–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Benakis L (1978–79) Tò πρόβλημα τῶν γενικῶν ἐννοιῶν καὶ ὁ ἐννοιολογικὸς ρεαλισμὸς τῶν Βυζαντινῶν. Φιλοσοϕία 8–9:311–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvornik F (1948) The Photian schism, history and legend. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägg T (1975) Photios als Vermittler antiker Literatur. Pauly-Wissowa XXII/1:684–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Ierodiakonou K (2005) The Byzantine reception of Aristotle’s Categories. Synthesis Philosophica 20(1):7–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapriev G (2005) Philosophie in Byzanz. Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kustas GL (1973) Studies in Byzantine rhetoric. Patriarchikon Idryma Paterikon Meleton, Thessalonike

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemerle P (1971) Le premier humanisme byzantin. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Schamp J (1996a) La “localisation” chez Photios: traduction commentée de Questions à Amphilochios, 145. In: Motte A, Denooz J (eds) Aristotelica Secunda. Mélanges offerts à Christian Rutten, Centre d'Études aristotéliciennes. Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres, Université de Liège, Liège, pp 265–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Schamp J (1996b) Photios aristotélisant? Remarques critiques. In: Billerbeck M, Schamp J (eds) Kainotomia. Die Erneuerung der griechischen Tradition. Universitätsverlag Freiburg, Fribourg, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatakis B (1949) La philosophie Byzantine. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Matula, J. (2011). Photios of Constantinople . In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_401

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_401

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9728-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9729-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics