Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Peter Damian

  • Toivo J. Holopainen
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_378

Abstract

Peter Damian (c. 1007–1072), an Italian cardinal and religious leader, has a modest place in the history of philosophy because of his little treatise De divina omnipotentia (On Divine Omnipotence). Damian is often depicted as a thinker who, in his attempt to defend divine omnipotence, denied the universal validity of the principle of contradiction and affirmed that God can change the past. Such a view is based on a misinterpretation of Damian’s statements. He actually held that the past cannot be changed, but he did not see this as a limitation of divine omnipotence but as an expression of God’s power. Damian’s treatise reflects an early phase in the scholastic deliberation on philosophical theology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Damiani Petrus (1983–1993) Die Briefe des Petrus Damiani, 4 vols, ed. Reindel K. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Die Briefe der deutschen Kaiserzeit 4.1–4. München (De divina omnipotentia, i.e., Letter 119, is in vol 3, 1989, pp 341–384)Google Scholar
  2. Damien Pierre (1972) Lettre sur la toute-puissance divine, ed. Cantin A. Sources chrétiennes 191. Cerf, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. (The English translation of De divina omnipotentia in Damian Peter (1998) Letters 91–120, trans. Blum OJ. The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, pp 344–386, is too inaccurate for philosophical purposes)Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Cantin A (1972) Pierre Damien, Lettre sur la toute-puissance divine. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes. Cerf, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Endres JA (1910) Petrus Damiani und die weltliche Wissenschaft. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters 8.3. Aschendorff, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  3. Gonsette J (1956) Pierre Damien et la culture profane. Publications Universitaires, Louvain/Béatrice-Nauwelaerts, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Holopainen TJ (1996) Dialectic and theology in the eleventh century. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  5. Holopainen TJ (2006) Future contingents in the eleventh century. In: Hirvonen V, Holopainen TJ, Tuominen M (eds) Mind and modality: studies in the history of philosophy in Honour of Simo Knuuttila. Brill, Leiden, pp 103–120Google Scholar
  6. Knuuttila S (1993) Modalities in medieval philosophy. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Marenbon J (1996) Anselm and the early medieval Aristotle. In: Marenbon J (ed) Aristotle in Britain during the Middle Ages. Brepols, Turnhout, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  8. Moonan L (1980) Impossibility and Peter Damian. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62:146–163Google Scholar
  9. Remnant P (1978) Peter Damian: could God change the past? Can J Philos 8:259–268Google Scholar
  10. Resnick IM (1992) Divine power and possibility in St. Peter Damian’s De divina omnipotentia. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toivo J. Holopainen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of TheologyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland