Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Paul of Venice

  • Fabrizio Amerini
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_374

Abstract

Paul of Venice has been one of the most important logicians and metaphysicians of the Late Middle Ages. His philosophical attitude can be called Realist, since Paul erected a philosophical system in which different forms of medieval Realism have been combined together in an original way. Basically, Paul’s philosophy has been influenced by some relevant realistic thinkers such as John Wyclif and the late fourteenth century Oxonian realists, John Duns Scotus and Walter Burley. From Scotus, Paul inherits his major metaphysical doctrines: the univocity of the concept of being; the real distinction among categories; the extramental foundation of universals; the technical notions of formal distinction, individual differentia, and thisness (haecceitas). Paul’s basic metaphysical intuition – viz. that the extramental world is made up of individual things, which can be construed as a cluster of universal forms, formally distinct from each other – can be traced back to Burley. Upon such metaphysics, Paul grounds his interpretation of Aristotle’s epistemology and psychology, which significantly departs in many points from Averroes’ interpretation. On the other hand, his eclectic and epitomizing attitude toward medieval philosophy leads Paul to be open to other traditions of thought. Thus, Paul refers to Albert of Saxony and other Parisian physicians when he has to explain natural philosophy; Thomas Aquinas plays a crucial role in Paul’s account of Aristotle’s metaphysics; Giles of Rome instead exerts a decisive influence on most of Paul’s Aristotelian Commentaries; finally, Paul does not miss the opportunity of discussing critically, in his handbooks, the logical and philosophical doctrines of many Nominalists of the fourteenth century, from William of Ockham and Gregory of Rimini up to John Buridan and Marsilius of Inghen. This methodological attitude certainly contributes to rendering his works stimulating and historically interesting, although it enormously complicates the interpreter’s attempt to single out Paul’s own position. Perhaps this is the reason why Paul has been wrongly regarded as Nominalist in logic, Thomist in metaphysics, and Averroist in psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Ashworth Earline Jennifer (ed) (1988) Logica magna. Part II, Fascicule 8: Tractatus de obligationibus. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Broadie Alexander (ed) (1990) Logica magna. Part II, Fascicule 3: Tractatus de hypotheticis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke Patricia (ed) (1981) Logica magna. Part I, Fascicule 7: Tractatus de scire et dubitare. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Conti Alessandro Domenico (1990) Quaestio de universalibus, unpublished. A partial transcription from ms. Paris, BN 6433B is in Johannes Sharpe, Quaestio super universalia. Olschki, Firenze, Appendix V, pp 199–207Google Scholar
  5. del Punta Francesco, Adams Mc Cord Marilyn (eds) (1978) Logica magna. Part II, Fascicule 6: Tractatus de veritate et falsistate propositionis et tractatus de significato propositionis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Hughes George Edward (ed) (1990) Logica magna. Part II, Fascicule 4: Capitula de conditionali et de rationali. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Kretzmann Norman (ed) (1979) Logica magna. Part I, Fascicule 1: Tractatus de terminis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Paul of Venice (1472) Logica magna, Venice (repr. Olms, Hidesheim, 1970)Google Scholar
  9. Paul of Venice (1477) Expositio in libros Posteriorum Aristotelis, Venice. (repr. Olms, Hildesheim, 1976)Google Scholar
  10. Paul of Venice (1493) Sophismata aurea, VeniceGoogle Scholar
  11. Paul of Venice (1494) Expositio super Universalia Porphyrii et Artem Veterem Aristotelis, Venice (a provisional critical edition of Paul’s Commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge has been made by Conti AD at http://www-static.cc.univaq.it/diri/lettere/docenti/conti/Pagine/edizioni.htm)
  12. Paul of Venice (1498) Expositio super libros De generatione et corruptione, VeniceGoogle Scholar
  13. Paul of Venice (1499) Expositio super octo libros Physicorum, VeniceGoogle Scholar
  14. Paul of Venice (1503) Summa philosophiae naturalis, Venice (repr. Olms, Hildesheim, 1974)Google Scholar
  15. Paul of Venice (1504) Scriptum super libros De anima, VeniceGoogle Scholar
  16. Perreiah Alan (ed) (1971) Logica magna: Tractatus de suppositionibus. The Franciscan Institute, St. BonaventureGoogle Scholar
  17. Perreiah Alan (ed) (2002) Logica parva. First critical edition from the manuscripts with introduction and commentary. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruello Francis (ed) (1980) Super primum Sententiarum Johannis de Ripa lecturae abbreviatio, prologus. Olschki, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruello Francis (ed) (2000) Super primum Sententiarum Johannis de Ripa lecturae abbreviatio, Liber I. Sismel-Edizioni del Galluzzo, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  20. (unpublished) Expositio super libros Metaphysicorum (Book 7 is in course of publication by Fabrizio A and Galluzzo G, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pise)Google Scholar
  21. Williams Christopher John Fards (ed) (1991) Logica magna. Part I, Fascicule 8: Tractatus de necessitate et contingentia futurorum. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Amerini F (2004) Thomas Aquinas, Alexander of Alexandria, and Paul of Venice on the nature of essence. DS 15:541–591Google Scholar
  2. Amerini F (2008) Alessandro di Alessandria come fonte di Paolo Veneto. Il caso degli accidenti eucaristici. Picenum Seraphicum 25:19–67Google Scholar
  3. Bottin F (1976) Proposizioni condizionali, consequentiae e paradossi dell’implicazione in Paolo Veneto. Medioevo 2:289–330Google Scholar
  4. Bottin F (1984) Logica e filosofia naturale nelle opere di Paolo Veneto. In: Poppi A (ed) Scienza e filosofia all’Università di Padova nel Quattrocento. Antenore, Padua, pp 85–124Google Scholar
  5. Conti AD (1982) Universali e analisi della predicazione in Paolo Veneto. Teoria 2.2:121–139Google Scholar
  6. Conti AD (1992) Il problema della conoscibilità del singolare nella gnoseologia di Paolo Veneto. BISI 98:323–382Google Scholar
  7. Conti AD (1993) Il sofisma di Paolo Veneto: Sortes in quantum homo est animal. In: Read S (ed) Sophisms in medieval logic and grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 304–318Google Scholar
  8. Conti AD (1996) Esistenza e verità: forme e strutture del reale in Paolo Veneto e nel pensiero filosofico del tardo Medioevo. Edizioni dell’Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medio Evo, RomeGoogle Scholar
  9. Conti AD (1998) Paul of Venice on individuation. RTPM 65(1):107–132Google Scholar
  10. Conti AD (2003) Paul of Venice’s theory of divine ideas and its sources. DS 14:409–448Google Scholar
  11. Conti AD (2004) Complexe significabile and truth in Gregory of Rimini and Paul of Venice. In: Maierù A, Valente L (eds) Medieval theories on assertive and non-assertive language. Olschki, Florence, pp 473–494Google Scholar
  12. Conti AD (2005) Paul of Venice. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter 2005 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2005/entries/paul-venice/
  13. Galluzzo G (2005) Definition in Aristotle’s metaphysics book Z, chaps. 10–11: medieval interpretations, PhD dissertation. Scuola Normale Superiore, Pise, 199 ffGoogle Scholar
  14. Kretzmann N (1970) Medieval logicians on the meaning of the proposition. J Philos 67:767–787Google Scholar
  15. Loisi S (2006) L’immaginazione nel commento al De anima di Paolo Veneto. SS 11:267–299Google Scholar
  16. Maierù A (ed) (1982) English logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th centuries, Bibliopolis, Naples (see the contributions of Conti AD, Alcune note sulla Expositio super Universalia Porphyrii et Artem Veterem Aristotelis di Paolo Veneto: Analogie e differenze con i corrispondenti commenti di Walter Burley, pp 293–303; Mugnai M, La expositio reduplicativarum chez Walter Burleigh et Paulus Venetus, pp 305–320; Van Der Lecq R, Paul of Venice on composite and divided sense, pp 321–330; Karger E, La supposition materielle comme suppositions significative: Paul de Venice, Paul de Pergula, pp 331–341)Google Scholar
  17. Momigliano A (1907) Paolo Veneto e le correnti del pensiero religioso e filosofico del suo tempo. Doretti, UdineGoogle Scholar
  18. Nardi B (1958) Saggi sull’averroismo padovano dal secolo XIV al XVI. Sansoni, Florence, pp 75–93 (Paolo Veneto e l’averroismo padovano)Google Scholar
  19. Nuchelmans G (1973) Theories of the proposition: ancient and medieval conceptions of the bearers of truth and falsity. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 266–271Google Scholar
  20. Nuchelmans G (1983) Medieval problems concerning substitutivity (Paul of Venice, Logica Magna II, 11:7–8). In: Abrusci VA, Casari E, Mugnai M (eds) Atti del Congresso Internazionale di Storia della Logica: San Gimignano, 4–8 dicembre 1982. CLUEB, Bologna, pp 69–80Google Scholar
  21. Olivieri L (ed) (1983) Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna. Antenore, Padua (see the contributions of Kuksewicz Z, Paolo Veneto e la sua teoria dell’anima, pp 130–164; Bottin F, Paolo Veneto e il problema degli universali, pp 459–468)Google Scholar
  22. Pagallo GF (1960) Nota sulla Logica di Paolo Veneto: la critica alla dottrina del complexe significabile di Gregorio da Rimini. In: Atti del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia, vol 9. Sansoni, Florence, pp 183–191Google Scholar
  23. Perreiah AR (1978) Insolubilia in the Logica parva of Paul of Venice. Medioevo 4:145–172Google Scholar
  24. Perreiah AR (1986) Paul of Venice: a bibliographical guide. Philosophy Documentation Center, Bowling GreenGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruello F (1978) Paul de Venise thélogien ‘averroiste’? In: Jolivet J (ed) Multiple Averroès. Vrin, Paris, pp 257–272Google Scholar
  26. Universality of reason, plurality of philosophies in Middle Ages. XII international congress of medieval philosophy, Palermo, 16–22 September 2007, Special session no 12 coordinated by Francesco del Punta (contributions of Amerini F, Bertagna M, Borgo M, Conti AD, Galluzzo G, Strobino R, Tabarroni A: all the contributions will be published in the coming proceedings)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabrizio Amerini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly