Skip to main content
  • 179 Accesses

Abstract

Adam Wodeham (d. 1358), Oxford Franciscan protégé of Ockham and influential adherent of Ockham’s philosophical approach in the years of Oxford’s “Golden Age” of theology. Wodeham’s most important philosophical innovation was the “complex significable,” akin to the contemporary idea of States of Affairs. He developed this in his epistemological project of ascertaining what we understand when we claim knowledge of things in the world. Ockham had held that the objects of scientific knowledge are mental propositions in which the concept naturally signifies the perceived objects, which led to questions about whether we make judgments about mental propositions or things. Wodeham’s innovation was to argue that we formulate judgments about things in the world when things conform to the way the mind formulates propositions about them. While this does not introduce a new layer of ontological complexity to the extramental world, it does focus attention on the natural method by which we propositionalize what we perceive. Wodeham’s doctrine of complex significables was to be influential in later scholastic epistemological discourse, and it contributed importantly to the logico-semantic approach of Oxford theology. Wodeham was also an important opponent of spatiotemporal atomism, a view that arose within the philosophical speculation about how to mathematize our understanding of the physical world that characterizes the thought of the Mertonian “Calculators.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Mair John (1512) Super Quattuor libros sententiarum: Abbrevatio Henrici Totting de Oyta (Abbreviated Oxford lectures), ed. Mair J. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair John (1966) Quaestio de divisione et compositione continui. In: Murdoch J, Two questions on the continuum. Francisc Stud 26:212–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair John (1988) Tratatus de indivisibilibus, ed. Wood R. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood Rega, Gál Gideon (eds) (1990) Lectura secunda, 3 vols (Norwich lectures). Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Brower-Toland S (2006) Facts vs. things: Adam Wodeham and the later medieval debate about objects of knowledge. Rev Metaphys 60:597–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtenay W (1978) Adam Wodeham. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gál G (1977) Adam of Wodeham’s question on the ‘Complexe Significabile’ as the immediate object of scientific knowledge. Francisc Stud 73:66–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelber H (1974) Logic and the trinity: a clash of values in scholastic thought, 1300–1335. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassi O (1986) Intuizione e significato: Adam Wodeham ed il problema della conoscenza nel XIV secolo. Editoriale Jaco, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Karger E (1995) William of Ockham, Walter Chatton, and Adam Wodeham on the objects of knowledge and belief. Vivarium 33(2):171–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Karger E (2004) Ockham and Wodeham on divine deception as a skeptical hypothesis. Vivarium 42(2):225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzman N (1984) Adam Wodeham’s anti-Aristotelian anti-atomism. Hist Philos Quart 4:381–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuchelmans G (1980) Adam Wodeham on the meaning of declarative sentences. Historiogr Linguist 7(1/2):177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Reina ME (1986) Cognizione intuitiva ed esperienza interiore in Adamo Wodeham. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 41:19–49; 211–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabel C (2002) Oxford Franciscans after Ockham: Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham. In: Evans GR (ed) Medieval commentaries on the ‘Sentences’ of Peter Lombard. Current research, vol I. Brill, Leiden/Boston/Köln, pp 359–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Spade PV (1988) Anselm and the background to Adam Wodeham’s theory of abstract and concrete terms. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 2:261–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla ED (1998) God, indivisibles, and logic in the later Middle Ages: Adam Wodeham’s response to Henry Harclay. Mediev Philos Theol 7:69–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachau K (1988) Vision and certitude in the age of Ockham. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood R (1982) Adam Wodeham on sensory illusions. Traditio 38:214–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood R (1989) Epistemology and omnipotence. In: Chodorow S, Sweeney J (eds) Popes, teachers and canon law in the Middle Ages. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 160–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood R (2003) Adam of Wodeham. In: Gracia JJE, Noone TB (eds) A companion to philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell companions to philosophy, vol 24. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupko J (1994) Nominalism meets indivisiblism. Mediev Philos Theol 3:158–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupko J (1994–1997) How it played in the rue de Fouarre: the reception of Adam Wodeham’s theory of the complexe significable in the arts faculty at Paris in the mid-fourteenth century. Francisc Stud 54:211–225

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lahey, S. (2011). Adam Wodeham. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9728-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9729-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics