Skip to main content

Global Impartiality Thesis

  • Reference work entry
  • 127 Accesses

There are two things often assumed to be obvious about impartiality. One is that impartiality is roughly equivalent to equality. People are treated impartially when they are treated equally. The other is that impartiality is demanded by justice – impartiality is always just, partiality is always unjust.

There is some truth to these claims, but much that is false. They radically oversimplify both the complexity of the notion of impartiality and its normative force. Suppose impartiality meant treating people equally. If impartiality is morally required, that would mean that we should give equal importance in our actions to everyone’s interests. This is highly implausible. A parent does no wrong to favor the interests of his children over the interests of other children. A person should give preference to the needs of her friends and relatives. One also has obligations to those to whom one has made promises, and these typically take precedence over the needs of strangers. Further, we have...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   679.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blake M (2002) Distributive justice, state coercion and autonomy. Philos Public Aff 30:259–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum L (1994) Moral perception and particularity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham J (2010) Partiality and impartiality: morality, special relationships and the wider world. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jollimore T (2002/2006) Impartiality. In: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/impartiality/

  • Miller D (2005) Against global egalitarianism. J Ethics 9(1/2):55–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir Y (1993) Liberal nationalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan K-C (2004) Justice without borders: cosmopolitanism, nationalism and patriotism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos V (1962) Justice and equality. In: Brandt R (ed) Social justice. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 31–72

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Landesman, B.M. (2011). Global Impartiality Thesis. In: Chatterjee, D.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_95

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9159-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9160-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics