Encyclopedia of Global Justice

2011 Edition
| Editors: Deen K. Chatterjee

Global Basic Structure

  • Chris Armstrong
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_605

Justice and the Basic Structure

In his hugely influential A Theory of Justice (1971), John Rawls suggested that the subject of theories of justice ought to be the basic structure of individual societies. By basic structure, Rawls intended the major institutions of a society – including economic, political, and social ones – which taken together can have a huge impact on the individuals of that society. The reason the basic structure matters is because of this profound and immediate impact on citizens’ lives, and it is for that reason that the basic structure should be considered the subject or target of principles such as the Difference Principle. Though Rawls was pursued on questions such as whether the family was part of the basic structure, he held dear to the claim that such a structure provides the subject-matter for theories of distributive justice.

This emphasis on the centrality of the basic structure to theories of justice has been the subject of much debate. It has been...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Abizadeh A (2007) Cooperation, pervasive impact and coercion. Philos Public Aff 35:318–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beitz C (1979) Political theory and international relations. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Freeman S (2007) Rawls. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Moellendorf D (2002) Cosmopolitan justice. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  5. Pogge T (1989) Realizing Rawls. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  6. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Rawls J (1999) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Risse M (2006) What to say about the state. Soc Theory Pract 32:671–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tan K-C (2004) Justice without borders. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Armstrong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social SciencesUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK