Encyclopedia of Global Justice

2011 Edition
| Editors: Deen K. Chatterjee

Moral Cosmopolitanism

  • Alyssa R. Bernstein
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_329

Cosmopolitan political theorists of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, who write about the injustice of current international or global economic, environmental, political, legal, and/or social conditions, commonly base their arguments on one or another form of moral cosmopolitanism, or more precisely, on some conception(s) of morality belonging to that category. All cosmopolitan conceptions of morality hold that all human beings are morally important and must be properly taken into account in practical deliberations about any actions (especially lawmaking and policymaking) that may significantly affect anyone’s vital, fundamental, or otherwise important interests. Theorists who use the term “moral cosmopolitanism” may contrast it to “cosmopolitanism about institutions” (Beitz 1979/1999), or to “political,” “cultural,” and “economic” cosmopolitanism (Kleingeld and Brown 2006), or to “legal” and “social justice” cosmopolitanism (Pogge 2007). Other theorists may...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Appiah KA (2006) Cosmopolitanism: ethics in a world of strangers. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Beitz C (1979/1999) Political theory and international relations. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Beitz C (2009) The idea of human rights. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Brock G (2009) Global justice: a cosmopolitan account. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Caney S (2005) Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Caney S (2009) Cosmopolitanism and justice. In: Christiano T, Christman J (eds) Contemporary debates in political philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Caney S (2010) Cosmopolitanism. In: Bell D (ed) Ethics and world politics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Jaggar A (ed) (2010) Thomas Pogge and his critics. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones C (1999) Global justice: defending cosmopolitanism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleingeld P, Brown E (2006) Cosmopolitanism. In: Zalta EN (ed) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, USA. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/. Accessed 1 Apr 2011
  11. Moellendorf D (2002) Cosmopolitan justice. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  12. Moellendorf D (2009) Global inequality matters. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Pogge T (1992) Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethics 103(1):48–75Google Scholar
  14. Pogge T (2007) Cosmopolitanism. In: Goodin R, Pettit P (eds) A companion to contemporary political philosophy. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Scheffler S (1982) The rejection of consequentialism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Scheffler S (ed) (1988) Consequentialism and its critics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Scheffler S (2001) Boundaries and allegiances: problems of justice and responsibility in liberal thought. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Singer P (1972) Famine, affluence, and morality. Philos Public Aff 1:229–243Google Scholar
  21. Singer P (2002/2004) One world: the ethics of globalization. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  22. Singer P (2006) Why care about equality? Cato-unbound.org. http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/03/07/peter-singer/why-care-about-equality/. Accessed 1 Apr 2011
  23. Tan K (2004) Justice without borders: cosmopolitanism, nationalism and patriotism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Tan K (2010) Poverty and global distributive justice. In: Bell D (ed) Ethics and world politics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Waldron J (1992) Minority cultures and the cosmopolitan alternative. Univ Mich J Law Reform 25(3–4):751–793Google Scholar
  26. Wood A (1999) Kant’s ethical thought. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alyssa R. Bernstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyOhio UniversityAthensUSA