Love (Affective, Sexual)
The dimension of human life known as love seems unique. In fact, theologians have occasionally proposed that in order to balance out the overemphasis on the capacity for abstract thought in defining humanity, the capacity for love should be underlined instead. As it is, though, affectual bonding between parents and their offspring or an individual and a particular sexual partner is seen in many taxa of birds and mammals. Hence, when it comes to love, humans are clearly not alone. Based upon the terminology used in Ancient Greek texts, one should distinguish between at least four types of love: the romantic and sexual erōs, the friendship oriented philia, the parental storgē, and the selfless, forgiving agapē. Of these, the present entry concerns only the first.
As Andreas Bartels and Semir Zeki comment, romantic love, celebrated throughout the ages as perhaps the most overwhelming of...
- Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport, 11(17), 3829–3834.Google Scholar
- Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. Neuroimage, 21(3), 1155–1166.Google Scholar
- D’Aquili, E. G., & Newberg, A. B. (2000). The neuropsychology of aesthetic, spiritual, and mystical states. Zygon: The Journal of Religion and Science, 35(1), 39–51.Google Scholar
- Esch, T., & Stefano, G. B. (2005). The neurobiology of love. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 26(3), 175–192.Google Scholar
- Fisher, H. (2004). Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
- Fisher, H., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2006). Romantic love: A mammalian brain system for mate choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 361(1476), 2173–2186.Google Scholar
- Jung, C. G. (2008). Aspects of the feminine. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kather, R. (2008). Humans as part of nature: The concept of life and the temporal implications of actions. In W. B. Drees et al. (Eds.), Creation’s diversity: Voices from theology and science (pp. 26–42). London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
- Komisaruk, B., & Whipple, B. (1998). Love as sensory stimulation: Physiological consequences of its deprivation and expression. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(8), 927–944.Google Scholar
- Lear, J. (1990). Love and its place in nature: A philosophical interpretation of Freudian psychoanalysis. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar