Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions

2013 Edition
| Editors: Anne L. C. Runehov, Lluis Oviedo

Imagination

  • Lars Sandbeck
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1188

Related Terms

Etymology

The Greek and Latin terms for imagination reveal that imagination, from the beginning of Western thought, has been conceived as a kind of secondary, internal perception or sight. The Greek word phantasia is derived from phainesthai, meaning “to make oneself visible or seen,” and the underlying assumption seems to be that what makes itself seen through the imagination is something akin to but nonetheless different from sense perceptions. According to Aristotle (384–322), imagination makes images or representations appear, and these images (phantasmata) “are similar to objects perceived except that they are without matter” (432a9-10). Aristotle even suggests that phantasia (imagination) ultimately is derived from pháos(light) (429a3-4), since nothing, in Aristotle’s view, can appear to the perceiving mind without light. Thus, on this account, imagination is, metaphorically speaking, an internal light that...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Aristotle (1957). On the soul (W. S. Hett, Trans.). Cambridge: William Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Barbour, I. (1998). Religion and science. Historical and contemporary issues. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, M. (1983). Faith and imagination in science and religion. Theology Today, 40(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth, J. R. (2001). The symbolic imagination. Coleridge and the Romantic Tradition. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Coleridge, S. T. (1817). Biographia literaria. In K. Coburn (Ed.), The collected works VII. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
  6. Cornelius, C. (2007). Imaginary and imagination at the crossroads. In Z. Castoriadis et al. (Eds.), Figures of the thinkable (pp. 71–90). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Daston, L. (2005). Fear and loathing of the imagination in science. Daedalus, 134(4), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Downie, R. (2001). Science and imagination in the age of reason. Medical Humanities, 27, 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engell, J. (1981). The creative imagination. Enlightenment to romanticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Feuerbach, L. (1841). Das Wesen des Christentums (3rd ed, 1969). Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam.Google Scholar
  11. Green, G. (1989). Imagining God. Theology and the religious imagination (2nd ed, 1998). Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  12. Harvey, V. A. (1995). Feuerbach and the interpretation of religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kearney, R. (1988). The wake of imagination. Toward a postmodern culture. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miner, R. (2004). Truth in the making. Creative knowledge in theology and philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Ricoeur, P. (1975). La métaphore vive. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  16. Robinson, G., & Rundell, J. (Eds.). (1994). Rethinking imagination. Culture and creativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Sartre, J.-P. (1940). L’Imaginaire: psychologie phénoménologique de l’imagination. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  18. Soulen, R. K., & Woodhead, L. (2006). Contextualizing human dignity. In R. K. Soulen & L. Woodhead (Eds.), God and human dignity (pp. 1–24). Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Sandbeck
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark