Skip to main content

Time

  • Reference work entry
  • 72 Accesses

The dual classification of cultural systems of time as Western or non‐Western is an oversimplification that limits our understanding of how time is created, represented, measured, and practiced in different cultures. The premises underlying dualistic thinking about time reveal its limitations.

First, dualistic thinking adopts the premise that Western time is linear (irreversible), abstract, quantitative, and homogeneous. In contrast, non‐Western time is cyclical (reversible), concrete, qualitative, and heterogeneous. There is a tendency to draw too sharp distinctions based on characteristics presumed to be in opposition. Underlying these are further distinctions between them (Oriental, primitive, oral, preindustrial) and us(Occidental, modern, literate, industrial). Embedded in these implicit distinctions is the assumption that non‐Western time is to be thought about within a conceptual frame that implicitly adopts Western time as a standard for perception and evaluation of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   609.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aveni, Anthony. Empires of Time: Calendars, Clocks, and Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans‐Pritchard, E. E. The Nuer. New York: Oxford University Press, 1940, reprinted 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, Johannes. Time and the Other. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, Alfred. The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Providence, Rhode Island: Berg, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Leopold E. A. The Social Determination of Knowledge: Maurice Bloch and Balinese Time. Man (N.S.) 16 (1981): 220–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. Person, Time and Conduct in Bali. In The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973. 360–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, Nancy. The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay. Annual Review of Anthropology 21(1992): 93–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz, Henry J., Ed. The Politics of Time. Washington, D. C.: American Anthropological Association, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‐‐‐. Meaning of Time in Primitive Societies. In Encyclopedia of Time. Ed. Samuel L. Macey. New York: Garland, 1994. 371–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‐‐‐. Primitive Time‐Reckoning. In Encyclopedia of Time. Ed. Samuel L. Macey. New York: Garland, 1994. 496–497.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Rutz, H.J. (2008). Time. In: Selin, H. (eds) Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4425-0_8892

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4425-0_8892

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4559-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4425-0

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics