Knowledge Systems: Indigenous Knowledge of Trees and Forests

  • Klaus Seeland
  • Mihir K. Jena
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4425-0_8650

Trees and forests act as indicators of cultural phenomena when interpreted in the context of a society. Their socio‐cultural interpretation indicates specific social needs and cultural values, while stimulating culturally distinct economic and technological processes. Methodologically, it is difficult to understand what trees and forests mean in a particular culture, as they are descriptive terms, not analytic ones. They invoke aesthetic and religious perceptions, botanical and silvicultural classifications, and economic valuations. The indigenous perspective is always an amalgamation of these perceptions and valuations, which characterizes the development of the local culture (Harrison 1993; Bahuchet 1993) and even culture in general.

Forests represent a legacy and are a testimony to the evolution or migration of biological species, flora and fauna, in various societies. Forests, trees, and their products are managed by indigenous people, who are knowledgeable about local consumption,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Bahuchet, Serge, comp. Situation des populations indigènes des forêts denses humides. Paris: CNRS, Laboratoire de Langues et Civilisations à Tradition Orale, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Ballée, W. Footprints of the Forest. Ka'apor Ethnobotany – The Historical Ecology of Plant Utilization by an Amazonian People. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. Brokensha, David W., D. M. Warren, and Oswald Werner, Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 1980.Google Scholar
  4. Descola, Ph. In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. Harrison, Robert P. Forests: The Shadow of Civilization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. Jena, M. K., et al. Forest Tribes of Orissa. Vol. 1: The Dongaria Kondh. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. ‐‐‐. Forest Tribes of Orissa. Vol. 2: The Kuttia Kondh. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Seeland, K. Indigenous Knowledge of Trees and Forests in Non‐European Societies. Nature is Culture. Indigenous Knowledge and Socio‐Cultural Aspects of Trees and Forests in Non‐European Cultures. Ed. K. Seeland. London: Intermediate Technology Publications, 1997. 101–12.Google Scholar
  9. Seeland, K. and F. Schmithüsen, ed. Man in the Forest. Local Knowledge and Sustainable Management of Forests and Natural Resources in Tribal Communities in India. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. ‐‐‐. Indigenous Knowledge, Forest Management and Forest Policy in South Asia. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. Warren, D., L. Slikerveer, and D. Brokensha, ed. The Cultural Dimension of Development. Indigenous Knowledge Systems. London: Intermediate Technology Publications, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Seeland
  • Mihir K. Jena

There are no affiliations available