Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism

2007 Edition
| Editors: David Gubbins, Emilio Herrero-Bervera

Westward Drift

  • Richard Holme
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_318

The time variation (secular variation) of the magnetic field was first recognized in the late 17th century. In attempting to provide a theory to explain it, Halley (1693) (qv) noticed that a large part of the secular variation could be explained in terms of a “westward drift” of the field. If maps of declination are produced over the Earth's surface at different epochs, then there is a clear westward movement of field patterns, particularly lines of zero declination (so‐called agonic lines) (e.g., Langel, 1987). Using his map of Atlantic secular variation, Halley estimated that a full revolution of the field would take about 700 years, giving a rotation rate of just over 0.5° per year. To explain the drift, he posited a model of the interior of the Earth consisting of concentric shells of magnetic material rotating at varying rates with respect to the Earth's surface. In many ways, his theory has remarkable similarities to our current understanding. The Earth does indeed consist of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bloxham, J., and Jackson, A., 1992. Time‐dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97: 19537–19563.Google Scholar
  2. Bullard, E.C., Freeman, C., Gellman, H., and Nixon, J., 1950. The westward drift of the Earth's magnetic field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 243: 61–92.Google Scholar
  3. Halley, E., 1693. On the cause of the change in the variation of the magnetic needle; with an hypothesis of the structure of the internal parts of the Earth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 17: 470–478.Google Scholar
  4. Hide, R., 1966. Free hydromagnetic oscillations of the Earth's core and the theory of the geomagnetic secular variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 259: 615–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hide, R., and Roberts, P., 1979. How strong is the magnetic field in the Earth's liquid core? Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 20: 124–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holme, R., and Whaler, K., 2001. Steady core flow in an azimuthally drifting reference frame. Geophysical Journal International, 145: 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Langel, R.A., 1987. The main field. In Jacobs, J.A. (ed.), Geomagnetism, Volume. 1. New York: Academic Press (Chap. 4).Google Scholar
  8. Yukutake, T., 1979. Review of the geomagnetic secular variations on the historical time scale. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 20: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Yukutake, T., and Tachinaka, H., 1969. Separation of the earth's magnetic field into drifting and standing parts. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, 47: 65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Holme

There are no affiliations available