Skip to main content

Archaeological Stratigraphy

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series ((EESS))

Introduction

Archaeologists have utilized stratigraphy in order to correlate sediment layers and archaeological assemblages for well over a century (Harris, 1989; Lyman and O’Brien, 1999; O’Brien and Lyman, 1999; Stein, 2000; Mills and Vega-Centeno, 2005). Relative-age determination based on the law of superposition and context is now used in essentially all archaeological excavations, and it is the foundation of almost every other dating technique as well as being more frequently applied than any other method. A site may contain hundreds of superimposed sediment layers, or built structures such as plazas, foundation walls, and streets, but in every case, stratigraphy is needed to interpret the age relationships of the artifacts and architecture. Stratigraphy is also crucial in reconstructing the landscape of occupation and past environments and in understanding site formation processes(see entry on Site Formation Processes in this volume). There have been few attempts to establish a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Binford, L. R., 1983. In Pursuit of the Past: Decoding the Archaeological Record. New York: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björck, S., 2007. Younger Dryas oscillation, global evidence. In Elias, S. A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1985–1993.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. L., 1968. Analytical Archaeology. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colcutt, S. N., 1987. Archaeostratigraphy: a geoarchaeologist’s viewpoint. Stratigraphica Archaeologica, 2, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordy, J.-M., 1987a. Modalités d‘application de la stratigraphie à l’archéologie. Stratigraphica Archaeologica, 2, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordy, J.-M., 1987b. Réflexions sur l'ethnostratigraphie. Stratigraphica Archaeologica, 2, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meyer, L. (ed.), 1984. Stratigraphica Archeologica, 1. Archaeostratigraphic Classification and Terminology Workshop, Ghent, University of Ghent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C., 1982. Science, social science, and common sense: the agonizing dilemma of modern archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research, 38(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C., and Stein, J. K., 1989. Theoretical issues in the interpretation of microartifacts. Geoarchaeology, 4(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrand, W. R., 1984. More on stratigraphic practice. Quarterly Review of Archaeology, 5(4), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedele, F. G., 1976. Sediments as palaeo-land segments: the excavation side of study. In Davidson, D. A., and Shackley, M. L. (eds.), Geoarchaeology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedele, F. G., 1984. Towards an analytical stratigraphy: stratigraphic reasoning and excavation. Stratigraphica Archaeologica, 1, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedele, F. G., and Franken, H. J., 1987. Report on the meeting in Brescia, Italy, July 5–8, 1984. Stratigraphica Archaeologica, 2, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fladmark, K. R., 1982. Microdebitage analysis: initial considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science, 9(2), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. A., 1954. The type concept revisited. American Anthropologist, 56(1), 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasche, H., and Tunca, O., 1983. Guide to archaeostratigraphic classification and terminology: definitions and principles. Journal of Field Archaeology, 10(3), 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, P., and Cohen, K. M., 2008. Global chronostratigraphical correlation table for the last 2.7 million years. Episodes, 31(2), 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. C., 1977. Units of archaeological stratification. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 10(1), 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. C., 1979. Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. C., 1989. Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy, 2nd edn. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. C., Brown, M. R., III, and Brown, G. J. (eds.), 1993. Practices of Archaeological Stratigraphy. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, C. V., and Huckell, B. B. (eds.), 2007. Murray Springs: A Clovis Site with Multiple Activity Areas in the San Pedro Valley, Arizona. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, H. D. (ed.), 1976. International Stratigraphic Guide: A Guide to Stratigraphic Classifications, Terminology, and Procedure. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, K. L., 1987. Identification of cultural site formation processes through microdebitage analysis. American Antiquity, 52(4), 772–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, A. D., 1944. The typological concept. American Antiquity, 9(3), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laury, R. L., and Albritton, C. C., Jr., 1975. Geology of middle stone age archaeological sites in the main Ethiopian Rift Valley. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 86(7), 999–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Tensorer, J.-M., 1984. L’archéostratigraphie: Problèmes méthodologiques et terminologiques, l’exemple de la fouille et des observations sur le terrain. Stratigraphica Archaeologica, l, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L., and O’Brien, M. J., 1999. Americanist stratigraphic excavation and the measurement of culture change. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 6(1), 55–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, D. J., and Holliday, V. T., 2010. Would North American Paleoindians have noticed Younger Dryas age climate changes? Journal of World Prehistory, 23(1), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, B. J., and Vega-Centeno, R., 2005. Sequence and stratigraphy. In Maschner, H. D. G., and Chippendale, C. (eds.), Handbook of Archaeological Methods. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, Vol. I, pp. 176–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. A., and Salvador, A. (eds.), 2000. International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification of IUGS International Commission on Stratigraphy. International Stratigraphic Guide—An abridged version. GeoArabia5(2), 231–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1983. North American stratigraphic code. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 67(5), 841–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 2005. North American stratigraphic code. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 89(11), 1547–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L., 1999. Seriation, Stratigraphy, and Index Fossils: The Backbone of Archaeological Dating. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, A. M., 1986. Cities of Clay: The Geoarchaeology of Tells. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskams, S. (ed.), 2000. Interpreting Stratigraphy: Site Evaluation, Recording Procedures and Stratigraphic Analysis. Papers presented to the interpreting stratigraphy conferences, 1993–1997. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, A. (ed.), 1994. International Stratigraphic Guide: A Guide to Stratigraphic Classifications, Terminology, and Procedure, 2nd edn. Trondheim, Norway/Boulder, CO: International Union of Geological Sciences/Geological Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., 1972. Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity, 37(2), 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., 1976. Behavioral Archeology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., 1983. Toward the identification of formation processes. American Antiquity, 48(4), 675–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding, A. C., 1953. Statistical techniques of the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity, 18(4), 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, T. W., Jr., 1981. Alluvial geology and archaeological potential of the Texas Southern high plains. American Antiquity, 46(3), 548–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. K., 1987. Deposits for archaeologists. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 11, 337–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. K., 1990. Archaeological stratigraphy. In Lasca, N. P., and Donahue, J. (eds.), Archaeological Geology of North America. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America. Centennial Special Volume, Vol. 4, pp. 513–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. K., 2000. Stratigraphy and archaeological dating. In Nash, S. E. (ed.), It’s About Time: A History of Archaeological Dating in North America. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 14–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. K., and Teltser, P. A., 1989. Size distributions of artifact classes: combining macro- and micro-fractions. Geoarchaeology, 4(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunca, Ö., 1987. Stratigraphie en archéologie du Proche Orient. Stratigraphica Archaeologica, 2, 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Plas, L., 1987. Dust into dust, and under dust to lie: a discussion note on archaeostratigraphy. Stratigraphica Archaeologica, 2, 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. J. C., Berkelhammer, M., Björck, S., Cwynar, L. C., Fisher, D. A., Long, A. J., Lowe, J. J., Newnham, R. M., Rasmussen, S. O., and Weiss, H., 2012. Formal subdivision of the Holocene Series/Epoch: a discussion paper by a working group of INTIMATE (Integration of ice-core, marine and terrestrial records) and the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (International Commission on Stratigraphy). Journal of Quaternary Science, 27(7), 649–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. A., and Wright, H. E., Jr., 1980. The end of the Pleistocene: a general critique of chronostratigraphic classification. Boreas, 9(3), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S. A., and Redman, C. L., 1984. Archeological Explanation: The Scientific Method in Archeology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, G. R., and Phillips, P., 1958. Method and Theory in American Archaeology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vance T. Holliday .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stein, J.K., Holliday, V.T. (2017). Archaeological Stratigraphy. In: Gilbert, A.S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Geoarchaeology. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4409-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics