Low-field magnetic susceptibility; Magnetic susceptibility
Magnetic susceptibility. The ratio of the magnetization induced in a sample to the inducing (magnetizing) field.
Volume susceptibility. Magnetic susceptibility expressed as susceptibility per unit volume (κ), dimensionless in SI units.
Mass magnetic susceptibility. Mass-normalized susceptibility (χ) equal to volume susceptibility divided by the density of the sample, in SI units of m3/kg.
Magnetic susceptibility quantifies the degree to which a substance can be magnetized in a weak magnetic field similar to that of the Earth’s field – i.e., 5–100 μT (microteslas) – (Banerjee, 1981). This is an easily measured property that is commonly used to assess the concentration of magnetic materials in a sample. Magnetic susceptibility, however, depends not only on the concentration of magnetic grains but also on the composition (magnetic mineralogy) and size of those grains. Grain size refers to the...
- Banerjee, S. K., 1981. Experimental methods of rock magnetism and paleomagnetism. In Saltzman, B. (ed.), Advances in Geophysics. New York: Academic, Vol. 23, pp. 25–99.Google Scholar
- Clark, A. J., 1996. Seeing Beneath the Soil: Prospecting Methods in Archaeology. London: B. T. Batsford. Rev. ed.Google Scholar
- Dalan, R. A., 2006a. Magnetic susceptibility. In Johnson, J. K. (ed.), Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Explicitly North American Perspective. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, pp. 161–203.Google Scholar
- Dalan, R. A., and Sharp, J., 2012. Magnetic Susceptibility Studies in Excavation Blocks 1–4. Unpublished report submitted to the Poverty Point Station Archaeology Program, Epps, LA. Moorhead: Department of Anthropology and Earth Science, Minnesota State University Moorhead.Google Scholar
- Dalan, R. A., Holley, G. R., Michlovic, M., Gooding, E., and Watters, H., Jr., 2007. Comprehensive Significance Study of the Biesterfeldt Site (32RM1), Ransom County, North Dakota. Unpublished report submitted to the Midwest Archeological Center, National Park Service, Lincoln, NE. Moorhead: Department of Anthropology and Earth Science, Minnesota State University Moorhead.Google Scholar
- Dearing, J. A., 1999. Environmental Magnetic Susceptibility: Using the Bartington MS2 System, 2nd edn. Kenilworth: Chi Publishing.Google Scholar
- Dearing, J. A., Maher, B. A., and Oldfield, F., 1985. Geomorphological linkages between soils and sediments: the role of magnetic measurements. In Richards, K. S., Arnett, R. R., and Ellis, S. (eds.), Geomorphology and Soils. London: Allen and Unwin, pp. 245–266.Google Scholar
- Evans, M. E., and Heller, F., 2003. Environmental Magnetism: Principles and Applications of Enviromagnetics. Amsterdam: Academic.Google Scholar
- Gaffney, C. F., and Gater, J., 2003. Revealing the Buried Past: Geophysics for Archaeologists. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
- Greenlee, D. M., 2009. 2009 Annual report of the station archaeology program at the poverty point state historic site. Unpublished report submitted to the Division of Archaeology, Louisiana Department of Cultural, Recreation and Tourism, Baton Rouge, LA. Monroe: Department of Geosciences, University of Louisiana at Monroe.Google Scholar
- Hunt, C. P., Moskowitz, B. M., and Banerjee, S. K., 1995. Magnetic properties of rocks and minerals. In Ahrens, T. J. (ed.), Rock Physics and Phase Relations: A Handbook of Physical Constants. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union. AGU Reference Shelf, Vol. 3, pp. 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McNeill, J., 1986. Geonics EM38 Ground Conductivity Meter: Operating Instructions and Survey Interpretation Techniques. Mississauga: Geonics Limited. Technical Note TN-21.Google Scholar
- McNeill, J., and Bosnar, M., 1999. Application of “Dipole-Dipole” Electromagnetic Systems for Geological Depth Sounding. Mississauga: Geonics Limited. Technical Note TN-31.Google Scholar
- Mullins, C. E., 1974. The magnetic properties of the soil and their application to archaeological prospecting. Archaeo-Physika, 5, 143–347.Google Scholar