Encyclopedia of Geoarchaeology

2017 Edition
| Editors: Allan S. Gilbert

Pre-Clovis Geoarchaeology

  • Andrea FreemanEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4409-0_104


Pre-Clovis geoarchaeology involves the geoarchaeological investigation of the material remains of people predating the Clovis complex in the Americas – i.e., before 11,500 14C years BP (Haynes, 1993; cf., Haynes et al., 2007; Waters and Stafford, 2007; and Waters et al., 2015 for further discussion). Typically, geoarchaeological investigations of this kind must study the context of the material remains embedded within geologic strata and interpret the depositional history and postdepositional alterations at the site and, occasionally, the archaeometric aspects of the finds, such as determining chronology.

Historical background

The geoarchaeological investigation of pre-Clovis sites in the Americas began long before the term “geoarchaeology” was commonly used (Rapp and Gifford, 1982) and before the Clovis projectile point type was formally defined (Cotter, 1937; Howard, 1943). Throughout the history of scientific archaeology in the Americas, archaeological sites indicating...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Cotter, J. L., 1937. The occurrence of flints and extinct animals in pluvial deposits near Clovis, New Mexico, Part IV: Report of the excavations at the gravel pit in 1936. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, 89, 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. Cotter, J. L., 1991. Update on Natchez man. American Antiquity, 56(1), 36–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dexter, R. W., 1986. Historical aspects of the Calaveras skull controversy. American Antiquity, 51(2), 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erlandson, J. M., Graham, M. H., Bourque, B. J., Corbett, D., Estes, J. A., and Steneck, R. S., 2007. The kelp highway hypothesis: marine ecology, the coastal migration theory, and the peopling of the Americas. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 2(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fedje, D. W., and Christensen, T., 1999. Modeling paleoshorelines and locating early Holocene coastal sites in Haida Gwaii. American Antiquity, 64(4), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fedje, D. W., Mackie, Q., Dixon, E. A., and Heaton, T. H., 2004. Late Wisconsin environments and archaeological visibility on the northern Northwest Coast. In Madsen, D. B. (ed.), Entering America: Northeast Asia and Beringia Before the Last Glacial Maximum. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 97–138.Google Scholar
  7. Freeman, A. K. L., in press. Why the ice-free corridor is still relevant to the peopling of the New World. In Kornfeld, M., and Huckell, B. (eds.), Stones, Bones, and Profiles: Exploring Archaeological Context, Early American Hunter-Gatherers, and Bison. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
  8. Goebel, T., 1999. Pleistocene human colonization of Siberia and peopling of the Americas: an ecological approach. Evolutionary Anthropology, 8(6), 208–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goebel, T., Waters, M. R., and O’Rourke, D. H., 2008. The Late Pleistocene dispersal of modern humans in the Americas. Science, 319(5869), 1497–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haynes, C. V., Jr., 1964. Fluted projectile points: their age and dispersion: stratigraphically controlled radiocarbon dating provides new evidence on peopling of the New World. Science, 145(3639), 1408–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haynes, C. V., Jr., 1993. Clovis-Folsom geochronology and climatic change. In Soffer, O., and Praslov, N. D. (eds.), From Kostenki to Clovis: Upper Paleolithic Paleo-Indian Adaptations. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haynes, G., Anderson, D. G., Ferring, C. R., Fiedel, S. J., Grayson, D. K., Haynes, C. V., Jr., Holliday, V. T., Huckell, B. B., Kornfeld, M., Meltzer, D. J., Morrow, J., Surovell, T., Waguespack, N. M., Wigand, P., and Yohe, R. M., II, 2007. Comment on “Redefining the Age of Clovis: Implications for the Peopling of the Americas”. Science, 317(5836), 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holliday, V. T., 2009. Geoarchaeology and the search for the first Americans. Catena, 78(3), 310–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holliday, V. T., and Meltzer, D. J., 1996. Geoarchaeology of the Midland (Paleoindian) site, Texas. American Antiquity, 61(4), 755–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holmes, C. E., 2001. Tanana River valley archaeology circa 14,000 to 9000 B.P. Arctic Anthropology, 38(2), 154–170.Google Scholar
  16. Howard, E. B., 1943. Folsom and Yuma problems. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 86(2), 255–259.Google Scholar
  17. Josenhans, H. W., Fedje, D. W., Conway, K. W., and Barrie, J. V., 1995. Post glacial sea levels on the western Canadian continental shelf: evidence for rapid change, extensive subaerial exposure, and early human habitation. Marine Geology, 125(1–2), 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyell, C., 1863. The Geological Evidences of the Antiquity of Man; with Remarks on Theories of the Origin of Species by Variation. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  19. Lyell, C., 1873. The Geological Evidence of the Antiquity of Man with an Outline of Glacial and Post-Tertiary Geology and Remarks on the Origin of Species with Special Reference to Man’s First Appearance on the Earth, 4th edition revised. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  20. Madsen, D. B. (ed.), 2004. Entering America: Northeast Asia and Beringia Before the Last Glacial Maximum. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mandryk, C. A., 1990. Could humans survive the ice-free corridor?: late-glacial vegetation and climate in west central Alberta. In Agenbroad, L. D., Mead, J. I., and Nelson, L. W., (eds.), Megafauna and Man: Discovery of America's Heartland. Scientific Papers 1. Hot Springs, South Dakota: Mammoth Site of Hot Springs, South Dakota, pp. 67–79.Google Scholar
  22. Meltzer, D. J., 1983. The antiquity of man and the development of American archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 6, 1–51.Google Scholar
  23. Meltzer, D. J., 2005. The seventy-year itch: controversies over human antiquity and their resolution. Journal of Anthropological Research, 64(4), 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meltzer, D. J., Grayson, D. K., Ardila, G., Barker, A. W., Dincauze, D. F., Haynes, C. V., Mena, F., Núñez, L., and Stanford, D. J., 1997. On the Pleistocene antiquity of Monte Verde, southern Chile. American Antiquity, 62(4), 659–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meltzer, D. J., Todd, L. C., and Holliday, V. T., 2002. The Folsom (Paleoindian) type site: past investigations, current studies. American Antiquity, 67(1), 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Powers, W. R., and Hoffecker, J. F., 1989. Late Pleistocene settlement in the Nenana valley, central Alaska. American Antiquity, 54(2), 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quimby, G. I., 1956. The locus of the Natchez pelvis find. American Antiquity, 22(1), 77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rapp, G., Jr., and Gifford, J. A., 1982. Archaeological geology: at the interface of geology and archaeology a new discipline is taking shape, with a wide variety of research methods and an eclectic approach to data. American Scientist, 70(1), 45–53.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, R. A., and Martin, L. D., 1984. The 12 Mile Creek site: a reinvestigation. American Antiquity, 49(4), 757–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor, R. E., and Payen, L. A., 1979. The role of archaeometry in American archaeology: approaches to the evaluation of the antiquity of Homo sapiens in California. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 239–283.Google Scholar
  31. Waters, M. R., and Stafford, T. W., Jr., 2007. Redefining the age of Clovis: implications for the peopling of the Americas. Science, 315(5815), 1122–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waters, M. R., Stafford, T. W., Jr., Kooyman, B., and Hills, L. V., 2015. Late Pleistocene horse and camel hunting at the southern margin of the ice-free corridor: reassessing the age of Wally’s Beach, Canada. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(14), 4263–4267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropology and Archaeology and Earth Science ProgramUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada