Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards

2013 Edition
| Editors: Peter T. Bobrowsky

Time and Space in Disaster

  • Thomas Glade
  • Michael James Crozier
  • Nick Preston
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_52

Disasters in time and space

Early attempts to define disasters were based on the exceedence of certain loss thresholds. For instance, Sheehan and Hewitt (1996) classified as disasters all those events that killed or injured at least 100 people or caused at least US $1 million damage. This definition was further developed in more qualitative terms, e.g., by UNDRO (1984) “… an event, concentrated in time and space, in which a community undergoes severe danger and incurs such losses to its members and physical appurtenances that the social structure is disrupted and the fulfillment of all or some of the essential functions of the society is prevented.” Other definitions reduce the term disaster to those events where “.. large numbers of people exposed to hazard are killed, injured or damaged in some way …” (Smith, 2004, p. 5). In this context, Smith also states, that “there is no universally agreed definition of the scale on which loss has to occur in order to qualify as a disaster.”...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Cai, X., McKinney, D. C., and Rosegranta, M. W., 2003. Sustainability analysis for irrigation water management in the Aral Sea region. Agricultural Systems, 76(3), 1043–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dearing, J. A., Battarbee, R. W., Dikau, R., Larocque, I., and Oldfield, F., 2006. Human-environment interactions: towards synthesis and simulation. Regional Environmental Change, 6, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Engel, H., 1997. The flood events of 1993/1994 and 1995 in the Rhine River basin. In Destructive Water: Water-Caused Natural Disasters, their Abatement and Control (Proceedings of the Conference held at Anaheim, California, June 1996). IAHS Publ. No. 239, pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
  4. Glade, T., and Dikau, R., 2001. Gravitative massenbewegungen von naturereignis zur naturkatastrophe. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, 145, 42–55.Google Scholar
  5. Hufschmidt, G., Crozier, M., and Glade, T., 2005. Evolution of natural risk: research framework and perspectives. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 5, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keiler, M., 2004. Development of the damage potential resulting from avalanche risk in the period 1950-2000, case study Galtur. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 4, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. O’Hara, S. L., Wiggs, G. F. S., Mamedov, B., Davidson, G., and Hubbard, R. B., 2000. Exposure to airborne dust contaminated with pesticide in the Aral Sea region. The Lancet, 355(9204), 627–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith, K., 2004. Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Sheehan, L., and Hewitt, K. 1996. A pilot study of global natural disasters of the past twenty years. Working Paper No. 11, Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioural Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  10. UNDRO, 1984. Disaster Prevention and Mitigation. New York: Office of the Disaster relief Coordinator, United Nations. Preparedness Aspects, Vol. 11.Google Scholar
  11. Waltham, T., and Sholji, I., 2001. The demise of the Aral Sea an environmental disaster. Geology Today, 17, 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Glade
    • 1
  • Michael James Crozier
    • 2
  • Nick Preston
    • 2
  1. 1.Geomorphic Systems and Risk Research, Department of Geography and Regional ScienceUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.School of Geography, Environment and Earth SciencesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand