Encyclopedia of Soil Science

2008 Edition
| Editors: Ward Chesworth

Quality

  • Ward Chesworth
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3995-9_471

Soil quality may be defined as a measure of how well a soil fulfills either its intrinsic role in the biosphere, or its role as defined by the needs of human society.

With regard to its intrinsic role, soil provides habitat on the land surface, accumulates biomass, and ensures a level of biodiversity. Photosynthesizing species in the biomass collect solar energy and become the principal source of energy for other species, either by direct consumption, or indirectly as dead organic matter in the soil, metabolized by micro-organisms, mycorrhizae and fungi. In addition the soil acts as a conduit for nutrients and is an integral part of all material cycles on the land surface. (See  Soil,  Biogeochemical Cycles).

For societal purposes soil quality may be defined in terms of the ability of soil to perform a number of services such as: protection of the environment, maintenance of biodiversity, disposal of the wastes we generate, production of food, provision of foundations for roads and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Brady, N.C., and Weil, R.R., 2000. Elements of the Nature and Properties of Soils. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice‐Hall, 559 pp.Google Scholar
  2. van Breemen, N., 1993a. Soils as biotic constructs favoring net primary productivity. Geoderma, 57: 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. van Breemen, N., 1993b. Author's epilogue. Geoderma, 57: 229–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doran, J.W., and Jones, A.J., 1996. Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, 410 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Kirchner, J.W., 1989. The Gaia Hypothesis: can it be tested? Rev. Geophys., 27: 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kirchner, J.W., 1991. The Gaia hypotheses: are they testable? Are they useful? In Schneider, S.H., and Boston, P.J., eds., Scientists on Gaia. Boston: MIT Press, pp. 38–46.Google Scholar
  7. Kirchner, J.W., 2002. The Gaia Hypothesis: fact, theory and wishful thinking. Clim. Change, 52: 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lovelock, J., 1979. Gaia, A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Lovelock, J., 1988. Gaia, A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Margulis, L., and Sagan, D., 1997. Slanted Truths: Essays on Gaia, Symbiosis, and Evolution. New York: Copernicus, 368 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Volk, T., 2002. Toward a future for Gaia theory. Clim. Change, 52: 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ward Chesworth

There are no affiliations available