Skip to main content

Ambiguity and Ambiguity Aversion

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

Consider the following choice problem, known as ‘Ellsberg’s three-colour urn example’, or simply the ‘Ellsberg paradox’ (Ellsberg, 1961). An urn contains 30 red balls, and 60 green and blue balls, in unspecified proportions; subjects are asked to compare (a) a bet on a red draw with a bet on a green draw, and (b) a bet on a red or blue draw with a bet on a green or blue draw. If the subject wins a bet, she receives ten dollars; otherwise, she receives zero dollars. To model this situation as a problem of choice under uncertainty, let the state space be {S r , S g , S b } in obvious notation, and consider the bets in Figure 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aliprantis, C. and Border, K. 1994. Infinite Dimensional Analysis. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, F. and Aumann, R. 1963. A definition of subjective probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34, 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley, T. 2002. Knightian decision theory: Part I. Decisions in Economics and Finance 25(2), 79–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. and Weber, Martin. 1992. Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 325–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadeus-Masanell, R., Klibanoff, P. and Ozdenoren, E. 2000. Maxmin expected utility over savage acts with a set of priors. Journal of Economic Theory 92, 33–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, H. and Karni, E. 1994. Choquet expected utility with a finite state space: commutativity and act-dependence. Journal of Economic Theory 62, 469–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, G. 1953. Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier (Grenoble) 5, 131–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. 1968. A generalization of Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 30, 205–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. 1999. A definition of uncertainty aversion. Review of Economic Studies 66, 579–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. and Schneider, M. 2001. Recursive multiple-priors. Journal of Economic Theory 113, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. and Zhang, J. 2001. Subjective probabilities on subjectively unambiguous events. Econometrica 69, 265–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergin, H. and Gul, F. 2004. A subjective theory of compound lotteries. Mimeo. Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings, No. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F. and Marinacci, M. 2004. Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. Journal of Economic Theory 118, 133–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M. and Siniscalchi, M. 2003. A subjective spin on roulette wheels. Econometrica 71, 1897–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardato, P. and Marinacci, M. 2002. Ambiguity made precise: a comparative foundation. Journal of Economic Theory 102, 251–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I. 1987. Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16, 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D. 1989. Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18, 141–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D. 1993. Updating ambiguous beliefs. Journal of Economic Theory 59, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffray, J.-Y. 1994. Dynamic decision making with belief functions. In Advances in the Dempster- Shafer Theory of Evidence, ed. R. Yager, J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klibanoff, P. 2001. Characterizing uncertainty aversion through preference for mixtures. Social Choice and Welfare 18, 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M. and Mukerji, S. 2005. A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73, 1849–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. and Raiffa, H. 1957. Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. and Schmeidler, D. 1992. A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60, 745–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. 1986. Integral representation without additivity. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 97, 255–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. 1989. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57, 571–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siniscalchi, M. 2006. A behavioral characterization of plausible priors. Journal of Economic Theory 128(1), 91–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. 2003. Conditional preferences and updating. Journal of Economic Theory 108, 286–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Steven N. Durlauf Lawrence E. Blume

Copyright information

© 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this entry

Cite this entry

Siniscalchi, M. (2008). Ambiguity and Ambiguity Aversion. In: Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-58802-2_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-58802-2_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-78676-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-58802-2

Publish with us

Policies and ethics