Adaptive and Cooperative Cruise Control


The adaptive cruise control (ACC) and cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) system is the extension to the conventional cruise control (CC). This chapter focuses on the introduction of various design methodologies for ACC/CACC controllers. The ACC/CACC operation-mode transition and system architecture are presented in detail together with different system components to illustrate concepts and functions of ACC and CACC. A unified control problem formulation and multiple design objectives are then described. Different control design methodologies such as linear control design, nonlinear control design, model predictive control design, and fuzzy control design are reviewed.


Model Predictive Control Range Sensor Adaptive Cruise Control Preceding Vehicle Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Asadi B, Vahidi A (2011) Predictive cruise control: utilizing upcoming traffic signal information for improving fuel economy and reducing trip time. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 19:707–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bageshwar VL, Garrard WL, Rajamani R (2004) Model predictive control of transitional maneuvers for adaptive cruise control vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 53:1573–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruin Dd, Kroon J, Klaveren Rv, Nelisse M (2004) Design and test of a cooperative adaptive cruise control system. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE intelligent vehicle symposium, pp 392–396. ParmaGoogle Scholar
  4. Bu F, Tan H-S, Jihua H (2010) Design and field testing of a cooperative adaptive cruise control system. In: Proceedings of the 2010 American control conference, pp 4616–4621. BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  5. Corona D, De Schutter B (2008) Adaptive cruise control for a SMART car: a comparison benchmark for MPC-PWA control methods. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 16:365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corona D, Lazar M, De Schutter B, Heemels M (2006) A hybrid MPC approach to the design of a Smart adaptive cruise controller. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international conference on control applications. Munich, pp 231–236Google Scholar
  7. Ioannou P, Xu Z, Eckert S, Clemons D, Sieja T (1993) Intelligent cruise control: theory and experiment. In: Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE conference on decision and control, vol 2. San Antonio, pp 1885–1890Google Scholar
  8. ISO15622 (2010) Intelligent transport systems – Adaptive Cruise Control systems – Performance requirements and test proceduresGoogle Scholar
  9. ISO22179 (2009) Intelligent transport systems – Full speed range adaptive cruise control (FSRA) systems – Performance requirements and test proceduresGoogle Scholar
  10. Junmin W, Rajamani R (2004) Should adaptive cruise-control systems be designed to maintain a constant time gap between vehicles? IEEE Trans Veh Technol 53:1480–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim Y-S, Hong K-S (2004) An IMM algorithm for tracking maneuvering vehicles in an adaptive cruise control environment. Int J Control Autom Syst 2:310–318Google Scholar
  12. Li S, Li K, Rajamani R, Wang J (2011) Model predictive multi-objective vehicular adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 19:556–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liang C-Y, Peng H (1999) Optimal adaptive cruise control with guaranteed string stability. Veh Syst Dyn: Int J Veh Mech Mobil 32:313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu X-Y, Hedrick JK, Drew M (2002) ACC/CACC – control design, stability and robust performance. In: American control conference. AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  15. Marsden G, McDonald M, Brackstone M (2001) Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 9:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martinez J-J, Canudas-de-Wit C (2007) A safe longitudinal control for adaptive cruise control and stop-and-go scenarios. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 15:246–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moon S, Yi K (2008) Human driving data-based design of a vehicle adaptive cruise control algorithm. Veh Syst Dyn: Int J Veh Mech Mobil 46:661–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moon S, Moon I, Yi K (2009) Design, tuning, and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidance. Control Eng Pract 17:442–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naranjo JE, Gonzalez C, Reviejo J, Garcia R, de Pedro T (2003) Adaptive fuzzy control for inter-vehicle gap keeping. IEEE Trans Intel Transp Syst 4:132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Naranjo JE, Gonzalez C, Garcia R, de Pedro T (2006) ACC + Stop&go maneuvers with throttle and brake fuzzy control. IEEE Trans Intel Transp Syst 7:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naus G, Ploeg J, van de Molengraft R, Steinbuch M (2008) Explicit MPC design and performance-based tuning of an adaptive cruise control stop-&-go. In: IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium. Eindhoven, pp 434–439Google Scholar
  22. Naus GJL, Ploeg J, Van de Molengraft MJG, Heemels WPMH, Steinbuch M (2010a) Design and implementation of parameterized adaptive cruise control: An explicit model predictive control approach. Control Eng Pract 18:882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Naus GJL, Vugts RPA, Ploeg J, van de Molengraft MJG, Steinbuch M (2010b) String-stable CACC design and experimental validation: a frequency-domain approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59:4268–4279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Novakowski C, Shladover S, Bu F, O'Connell J, Spring J, Dickey S, Nelson D. (2010) Cooperative adaptive cruise control: testing drivers’ choices of following distances. California PATH, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  25. Persson M, Botling F, Hesslow E, Johansson R (1999) Stop and go controller for adaptive cruise control. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE international conference on control applications. Kohala Coast, Vol 2, pp 1692–1697, Vol 1692Google Scholar
  26. Rajamani R, Zhu C (2002) Semi-autonomous adaptive cruise control systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 51:1186–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shirakawa K (2008) PRISM: an in-vehicle CPU-oriented novel azimuth estimation technique for electronic-scan 76-GHz adaptive-cruise-control radar system. IEEE Trans Intel Transp Syst 9:451–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shladover S (1978) Longitudinal control of automated guideway transit vehicles within platoons. ASME J Dyn Syst, Meas Control 100:302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swaroop D, Hedrick JK (1996) String stability of interconnected systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 41:349–357MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vahidi A, Eskandarian A (2003) Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans Intel Transp Syst 4:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Arem B, Van Driel JG, Visser R (2006) The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Trans Intel Transp Syst 7:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Viti F, Hoogendoorn SP, Alkim TP, Bootsma G (2008) Driving behavior interaction with ACC: results from a field operational test in the Netherlands. In: Intelligent vehicles symposium, 2008 IEEE. Eindhoven, pp 745–750Google Scholar
  33. Weinberger M, Winner H, Bubb H (2001) Adaptive cruise control field operational test–the learning phase. JSAE Review 22:487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Widmann GR, Daniels MK, Hamilton L, Humm L, Riley B, Schiffmann JK, Schnelker DE, Wishon W (2000) Comparison of lidar-based and radar-based adaptive cruise control systems. In: SAE 2000 world congress, DetroitGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiao L, Gao F (2010) A comprehensive review of the development of adaptive cruise control systems. Veh Syst Dyn: Int J Veh Mech Mobil 48:1167–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yanakiev D, Kanellakopoulos I (1998) Nonlinear spacing policies for automated heavy-duty vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 47:1365–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang Y, Kosmatopoulos EB, Ioannou PA, Chien CC (1999) Autonomous intelligent cruise control using front and back information for tight vehicle following maneuvers. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 48:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou J, Peng H (2005) Range policy of adaptive cruise control vehicles for improved flow stability and string stability. IEEE Trans Intel Transp Syst 6:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California PATH, Institute of Transportation StudiesUniversity of California at Berkeley Bldg., Richmond Field StationRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations