Perception Tasks: Obstacle Detection

  • Stefano Debattisti


Obstacle detection is a widely studied field in the automotive industry because of the great importance it assumes in all systems that provide autonomous navigation of vehicles in an environment.

Many different obstacle detection systems have been developed. The main differences between these systems are the types of algorithms and sensors employed. Many studies have focused on road obstacle detection in order to perform such tasks as pre-crash, collision mitigation, stop and go, obstacle avoidance, and inter-distance management. An important issue in ensuring the reliability of obstacle detection is the choice of sensors: digital cameras, infrared sensors, laser scanners, radar, and sonar are commonly used to provide a complete representation of the vehicle’s surrounding area, allowing interaction with the world. Inertial sensors like odometers, speed sensors, position sensors, accelerometers, and tilt sensors are used to monitor the motion of the vehicle, measuring its speed, orientation, and position. This chapter is structured in three main sections: The first will introduce a classification of all perception sensors that can be used in this field; a brief description of each sensor will be provided in order to underline pros and cons regarding the obstacle detection field. In the second section, the main algorithms of obstacle detection will be shown, classified by the kind of sensor (or sensors) employed. The third section presents obstacle detection systems that use sensory fusion combining artificial vision with distance detection sensors like laser or radar.


Active Sensor Stereo Vision Radar Cross Section Sensor Fusion Passive Sensor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bertozzi M, Broggi A, Graf T, Grisleri L, Meinecke M-M (2003) Pedestrian detection in infrared images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium 2003, Columbus, pp 662–667Google Scholar
  2. Binelli E, Broggi A, Fascioli A, Ghidoni S, Grisleri P, Graf T, Meinecke M-M (2005) A modular tracking system for far infrared pedestrian recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium 2005, Las Vegas, pp 758–763Google Scholar
  3. Broggi A, Bertozzi M, Chapuis R, Fascioli FCA, Tibaldi A (2004) Pedestrian localization and tracking system with Kalman filtering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium 2004, Parma, pp 584–589Google Scholar
  4. Broggi A, Fascioli A, Carletti M, Graf T, Meinecke M-M (2004) A Multi-resolution approach for infrared vision-based pedestrian detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium 2004, Parma, pp 7–12Google Scholar
  5. Broggi A, Caraffi C, Porta PP, Zani P (2006) The single frame stereo vision system for reliable obstacle detection used during the 2005 Darpa grand challenge on TerraMax. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on intelligent transportation systems 2006, Toronto, pp 745–752Google Scholar
  6. DARPA Urban Challenge, Autonomous Vehicles in City Traffic (2009) Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. Gavrila D, Kunert M, Lages U (2001) A multi-sensor approach for the protection of vulnerable traffic participants the PROTECTOR project. In: Instrumentation and measurement technology conference, 2001. IMTC 2001. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE, vol 3. Budapest, pp 2044–2048Google Scholar
  8. Labayrade R, Royere C, Aubert D (2005) A collision mitigation system using laser scanner and stereovision fusion and its assessment. In: Intelligent vehicles symposium, 2005. Proceedings of IEEE, Las Vegas, pp 441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nanda H, Benabdelkedar C, Davis L (2003) Modeling pedestrian shapes for outlier detection: a neural net based approach. In: Proceedings of IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium 2003, Columbus, pp 428–433Google Scholar
  10. Talukder A, Manduchi R, Rankin A, Matthies L (2002) Fast and reliable obstacle detection and segmentation for cross-country navigation. In: Intelligent vehicle symposium, 2002. IEEE, vol 2. Versailles, pp 610–618Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Debattisti
    • 1
  1. 1.Dip. Ing. InformazioneUniversità di ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations