Advertisement

Advances in Drowsy Driver Assistance Systems Through Data Fusion

  • Darrell S. Bowman
  • William A. Schaudt
  • Richard J. Hanowski

Abstract

Every year, thousands of vehicles are involved in crashes which are attributed to the onset of driver drowsiness. As a result, there are numerous drowsy driver assistance systems (DDAS) available on the market; however, many of these technologies rely on a single predictor of driver drowsiness (e.g., eye closures, lane position, steering). Relying on only one predictor of drowsiness makes the system susceptible to periodic intervals in which data is unavailable due to failure of the single sensor, usage outside of the sensor’s envelope of operation, or driver’s individual differences. Driver drowsiness measures can be classified as either driver-based (those measures derived from the human) or vehicle-based (those measures derived from the vehicle). For driver-based measures, PERCLOS (a measure of slow eye closure) is considered to be a robust measure of driver drowsiness. Machine-vision (MV) slow eye-closure sensors have been developed to estimate the percent of eye closure and calculate the PERCLOS value. However, these MV slow eye-closure sensors’ ability to detect the eye closures is challenged by eyewear, ambient illumination, and head movement. For vehicle-based drowsiness metrics, lane position appears to be a key indicator of driver drowsiness. Lane position is typically estimated through MV technology detecting lane edge markings on the forward roadway scene. The absence of lane edge markings on roadways or instances of low contrast between lane markings and the surrounding scene make it difficult for this MV lane position sensing technology to accurately measure the vehicle’s position within the lane. Typical causes of low contrast lane markings include poor lane marking quality, artificial overhead lighting, or headlight “blooming.” Therefore, a multi-measure approach, that uses multiple distinct sensors, can offer not only sensor redundancy but also provide a data fusion approach whereby both measures provide more robust drowsiness detection than either measure could alone. This chapter describes the salient measures of driver drowsiness, the concept of data fusion in DDASs, and provides a case study of a prototype DDAS that integrates two drowsiness metrics (i.e., PERCLOS and Lane Position) to form an enhanced drowsiness estimate that may prove to be a more robust measure in a real-world, field application as compared to a single metric system.

Keywords

Data Fusion Lane Marking Lane Deviation Driver Drowsiness Lane Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Åkerstedt T, Peters B, Anund A, Kecklund G (2005) Impaired alertness and performance driving home from the night shift: a driving simulator study. J Sleep Res 14(1):17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artaud T, Planque S, Lavergne C, Cara H, de Lepine P, Tarrière C, Gueguen BM (1994) An on-board system for detecting lapses of alertness in car driving. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on enhanced safety of vehicles 1, MunichGoogle Scholar
  3. Baulk SD, Biggs SN, Reid KJ, van den Heuvel CJ, Dawson D (2008) Chasing the silver bullet: measuring driver fatigue using simple and complex tasks. Accid Anal Prev 40:396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhuiyan M (2009) Driver assistance systems to rate drowsiness: a preliminary study. In: Nakamatsu K, Phillips-Wren G, Jain L, Howlett R (eds) New advances in intelligent decision technologies, vol 199. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bliss JP, Acton SA (2003) Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. Appl Ergon 34(6):499–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brookhuis K (1995) Driver impairment monitoring by physiological measures. In: Hartley L (ed) Fatigue and driving: driver impairment, driver fatigue and driving simulation. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 181–188Google Scholar
  7. Brookhuis KA, de Waard D (2010) Monitoring drivers’ mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. Accid Anal Prev 42(3):898–903. doi:10.1016/j.aap. 2009.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brookhuis KA, Louwerens JW, O’Hanlon JF (1986) EEG energy-density spectra and driving performance under the influence of some anti-depressant drugs. In: O’Hanlon JF, de Gier JJ (eds) Drugs and driving. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 213–221Google Scholar
  9. Caffier PP, Erdmann U, Ullsperger P (2003) Experimental evaluation of eye-blink parameters as a drowsiness measure. Eur J Appl Physiol 89:319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatterjee A, Cadotte E, Stamatiadis N, Sink H, Venigalla M, Gaides G (1994) Driver-related factors involved with truck accidents. Southeastern Transportation Center Project No. 23385-019. Southeastern Transportation Center, KnoxvilleGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterjee A, Cadotte E, Stamatiadis N, Sink H, Venigalla M, Gaides G (1996) Driver-related factors involved with truck accidents. J Saf Res 27(1):56Google Scholar
  12. Dinges DF (1995) An overview of sleepiness and accidents. J Sleep Res 4:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dinges DF, Grace R (1998) PERCLOS: a valid psychophysiological measure of alertness as assessed by psychomotor vigilance. Report No. FHWA-MCRT-98-006. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Erwin CW (1976) Studies of drowsiness: final report. The National Driving Center, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  15. Erwin CW, Volow MR, Gray B (1973) Psychophysiologic indices of drowsiness. SAE, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fairclough SH (1997) Monitoring driver fatigue via driving performance. In: Ian Noy (ed) Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, Hillsdale, pp 363–379Google Scholar
  17. Folkard S (1997) Black times: temporal determinants of transport safety. Accid Anal Prev 29(4):417–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanowski RJ, Blanco M, Nakata A, Hickman JS, Schaudt WA, Fumero MC, Olson RL, Jermeland J, Greening M, Holbrook GT, Knipling RR, Madison P (2008) The drowsy driver warning system field operational test, data collection. Contract DTNH22-00-C-07007, Task Order 14, final report. National Highway Traffic Safety Admin., Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanowski RJ, Bowman DS, Wierwille WW, Alden A, Carroll R (2008) PERCLOS+: development of a robust field measure of driver drowsiness. In: Proceedings of the 15th world congress on intelligent transport systems (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  20. Horne JA, Reyner LA (1995) Sleep related vehicle accidents. Br Med J 310:565–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ingre M, Åkerstedt T, Peters B, Anund A, Kecklund G (2006) Subjective sleepiness, simulated driving performance and blink duration: examining individual differences. J Sleep Res 15:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kecklund GA, Akerstedt T (1993) Sleepiness in long distance truck driving: ambulatory EEG study of night driving. Ergonomics 36:1007–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kee S, Tamrin SBM, Goh Y (2010) Driving fatigue and performance among occupational drivers in simulated prolonged driving. Glob J Health Sci 2(1):167–177Google Scholar
  24. Knipling R (1998) The technologies, economics, and psychology of commercial motor vehicle driver fatigue management. Presented at the 1998 ITS America’s eighth annual meeting and exposition, DetroitGoogle Scholar
  25. Knipling RR, Wierwille WW (1994) Vehicle-based drowsy driver detection: current status and future prospects. In: Proceedings of the IVHS America 1994 annual meeting, Atlanta, pp 245–256Google Scholar
  26. Lal SKL, Craig A, Boord P, Kirkup L, Nguyen H (2003) Development of an algorithm for an EEG-based driver fatigue countermeasure. J Saf Res 34(3):321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lees MN, Lee JD (2007) The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems. Ergonomics 50(8):1264–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lenne MG, Triggs TJ, Redman JR (1997) Time of day variations in driving performance. Accid Anal Prev 29:431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu CC, Hosking SG, Lenné MG (2009) Predicting driver drowsiness using vehicle measures: recent insights and future challenges. J Saf Res 40:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyznicki JM, Doege TC, Davis RM, Williams MA (1998) Sleepiness, driving, and motor vehicle crashes. J Am Med Assoc 279(23):1908–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Misener J, Nowakowski C, O’Connell J, Murray J (2008) Onboard monitoring and reporting for commercial vehicle safety (OBMS) phase II: field operational test. Report No. UCB-ITS-PRR-2008-18. California PATH, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  32. Morad Y, Barkana Y, Zadok D, Hartstein M, Pras E, Bar-Dayan Y (2009) Ocular parameters as an objective tool for the assessment of truck drivers fatigue. Accid Anal Prev 41:856–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. National Transportation Safety Board (1990) Fatigue, alcohol, other drugs, and medical factors in fatal-to-the-driver heavy truck crashes, vol 1. NTSB publications. http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1990/ss9001.htm. Accessed 6 June 2011
  34. O’Hanlon JF, Kelley GR (1977) Comparison of performance and physiological changes between drivers who perform well and poorly during prolonged vehicular operation. In: Mackie RR (ed) Vigilance. Plenum, New York, pp 189–202Google Scholar
  35. O’Hanlon JF, Kelly GR (1974) A psycho-physiological evaluation of devices for preventing lane drift and run-off-road accidents, Technical report 1736-F. Human Factors Research Inc., Santa Barbara Research Park, GoletaGoogle Scholar
  36. Picot A, Charbonnier S, Caplier A (2010) Drowsiness detection based on visual signs: blinking analysis based on high frame rate video. Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference (I2MTC), Austin, 3–6 May 2010Google Scholar
  37. Pilutti T, Ulsoy G (1997) Identification of driver state for lane-keeping tasks: experimental results. In: Proc. of the American Control Conf, New Mexico, pp 3370–3374Google Scholar
  38. Shaughnessy JJ, Zechmeister EB (1994) Research methods in psychology. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Skipper JH, Wierwille WW (1985) An investigation of low-level stimulus-induced measures of driver drowsiness. In: Gale AG, Freeman MH, Haslegrave CM, Smith P, Taylor SP (eds) Proceedings of the conference on vision in vehicles. North Holland Elsevier Science, Nottingham, pp 139–148. (Discussion by Wierwille WW, 217–218)Google Scholar
  40. Skipper JH, Wierwille WW (1986) Drowsy driver detection using discriminant analysis. Human Factors 28(5):527–540Google Scholar
  41. Stern JA, Boyer D, Schroeder D (1994) Blink rate: a possible measure of fatigue. Human Factors 36(2):285–297Google Scholar
  42. Stutts JC, Wilkins JW, Vaughn BV (1999) Why do people have drowsy driving crashes? Input from drivers who just did. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Falls ChurchGoogle Scholar
  43. Sullivan JM (2008) Visual fatigue and the driver, technical report. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  44. Thiffault P, Bergeron J (2003) Monotony of road environment and drivers fatigue: a simulator study. Accid Anal Prev 35(3):381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tijerina L, Glecker M, Stoltzfus D, Johnston S, Goodman MJ, Wierwille WW (1999) A preliminary assessment of algorithms for drowsy and inattentive driver detection on the road. Presented at the 9th Intelligent Trans. So. of America, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Torsvall L, Åkerstedt T (1987) Sleepiness on the job: continuously measured EEG changes in train drivers. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 66:502–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Volow MR, Erwin CW (1973) The heart rate variability correlates of spontaneous drowsiness onset. International Automotive Engineering Congress, DetroitCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wickens C, Gordon S, Liu Y (1998) An introduction to human factors engineering. Addison-Wesley Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Wierwille WW (1994) Overview of research on driver drowsiness definition and driver drowsiness detection. In: Proc. of the 14th Int. Conf. on enhanced safety of vehicles, Munich, pp 462–468Google Scholar
  50. Wierwille WW, Hanowski RJ, Olson RL, Dinges DF, Price NJ, Maislin G, Powell IV JW, Ecker AJ, Mallis MM, Szuba MP, Ayoob A, Grace R, Steinfeld A (2003) NHTSA drowsy driver detection and interface project. Contract DTNH22-D-00–07007, Task Order 7, Final Rep. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. Williamson A, Feyer A, Friswell R (1996) The impact of work practices on fatigue in long distance truck drivers. Accid Anal Prev 28(6):709–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wylie CD, Schultz T, Miller JC, Mitler MM, Mackie RR (1996) Commercial motor vehicle driver fatigue and alertness study: technical summary. Rep. No. FHWA-MC-97-001. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  53. Zer Customs (2007) Mercedes attention assist. Retrieved from http://www.zercustoms.com/news/Mercedes-Attention-Assist.html. Accessed 3 June 2011

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darrell S. Bowman
    • 1
  • William A. Schaudt
    • 1
  • Richard J. Hanowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Truck and Bus Safety, Virginia Tech Transportation InstituteTransportation Research PlazaBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations