Automatic Crash Notification (ACN) systems employ advanced vehicle sensor data and in-vehicle communications technology to facilitate more efficient and effective post-crash support for drivers and passengers. An immediate call for help coupled with accurate information on location and crash severity could positively impact multiple levels of the transportation and rescue system. First, and most importantly, the rapid notification of rescue services and appropriate treatment of occupants following a serious crash has been proven to be a critical factor in reducing patient morbidity and mortality. These systems have the ability to save lives and directly improve patient care. Second, knowledge of the characteristics of a crash will allow rescue services to dispatch the most appropriate resources, which becomes critical in areas with limited resources or in areas where the crash site is at a significant distance from the nearest treatment facility. Finally, immediate recognition of a...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACS (2006) Resources for optimal care of the injured patient 2006. R Coscia, J Meredith. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, Chicago
Bedard M, Guyatt G et al (2002) The independent contribution of driver, crash, and vehicle characteristics to driver fatalities. Accid Anal Prev 34(6):717–727
Clark D, Cushing B (2002) Predicted effect of automatic crash notification on traffic mortality. Accid Anal Prev 34(4):507–513
Cudnik M, Newgard C et al (2008) Distance impacts mortality in trauma patients with an intubation attempt. Prehosp Emerg Care 12(4):459–466
Cummings P, Rivara F (2004) Car occupant death according to the restraint use of other occupants: a matched cohort study. J Am Med Assoc 291(3):343–349
Cunningham P (1995) North Carolina preventable mortality study with inter-rater reliability modifications. NHTSA report DOT HS 808 345
Esposito T, Illness C et al (1992) Rural preventable mortality study. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; NTIS [distributor], Washington, DC
Farmer C, Braver E et al (1997) Two-vehicle side impact crashes: the relationship of vehicle and crash characteristics to injury severity. Accid Anal Prev 29(3):399–406
Jones I, Champion H (1989) Trauma triage: vehicle damage as an estimate of injury severity. J Trauma 29(5):646–653
Kohn M, Hammel J et al (2004) Trauma team activation criteria as predictors of patient disposition from the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 11(1):1–9
MacKenzie E, Rivara F et al (2006) A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med 354(4):366–378
Maio R, Burney R et al (1996) A study of preventable trauma mortality in rural Michigan. J Trauma 41(1):83–90
NHTSA (2010) Traffic safety facts: highlights of 2009 motor vehicle crashes. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, NHTSA, Washington, DC
Norwood S, McAuley C et al (2002) A prehospital Glasgow coma scale score < or = 14 accurately predicts the need for full trauma team activation and patient hospitalization after motor vehicle collisions. J Trauma 53(3):503–507
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Augenstein, J.S., Bahouth, G.T. (2012). Post-crash Support Systems. In: Eskandarian, A. (eds) Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-085-4_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-085-4_32
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-084-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-085-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering