Advertisement

Fundamentals of Driver Assistance

  • Azim Eskandarian

Abstract

Driving is a complex task of strategic decision making, maneuvering and controlling the vehicle while responding to external stimuli, traffic laws, and imminent hazards. Driver’s cognitive perception and reaction, physiological, and psychological capabilities along with experience, age, and many other factors play a major role in shaping the driving behavior and the skills to control the vehicle. Driver assistance systems are designed to support the driver in performing the primary driving tasks and the secondary in-vehicle tasks that may be required (operating radio, etc.). The goal of driver assistance or ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems) is to enhance safety, comfort, and efficiency of driving by intervening in the handling aspects of the vehicle and supporting the secondary tasks for comfort, navigation, etc. Driver assistance deals with the environment in terms of sensing and responding, the vehicle in terms of sensing and actuating electromechanical systems, and most importantly the driver in terms of augmenting information, enhancing sensing capabilities, and assisting in control functions. This chapter examines various aspects of driver assistance system including driver cognitive perception–response, system types and classifications, integrated safety, man–machine interface, and evaluation of effectiveness. This chapter concludes with listing existing ADAS and research needs.

Keywords

Situational Awareness Lane Change Adaptive Cruise Control Driver Assistance System Advance Driver Assistance System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ascone D, Lindsey T, Cherian Varghese C (2009) An examination of driver distraction as recorded in NHTSA databases. NHTSA research note, DOT HS 811 216, Sept 2009, pp 1Google Scholar
  2. Augenstein J, Digges K, Ogata S, Perdeck E, Stratton J (2001) Development and validation of the urgency algorithm to predict compelling injuries. In: The 17th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV). Amsterdam, 4–7 June 2001Google Scholar
  3. Augenstein J, Digges K, Perdeck E, Stratton J, Bahouth G, Peter Baur P, Messner G (2007) Application of acn data to improve vehicle safety and occupant care. Paper number 07-0512. In: The 20th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles conference (ESV) in Lyon. France, 18–21 June 2007Google Scholar
  4. Behringer R, Sundareswaran S, Gregory B, Elsley R, Addison B, Guthmiller W, Daily R, Bevly D, (2004) The DARPA grand challenge – development of an autonomous vehicle. In: IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, 14–17 June 2004Google Scholar
  5. Bergasa LM, Nuevo J, Sotelo MA, Barea R, Lopez ME (2006) Real-time system for monitoring driver vigilance. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 7(1):63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breuer JJ, Faulheber A, Frank P, Gleissner S (2008) Real world safety benefits of brake assistance systems. ESV (2008) Paper number 07-0103Google Scholar
  7. Broggi A, Bombini L, Cattani S, Cerri P, Fedriga RI (2010) Sensing requirements for a 13,000 km intercontinental autonomous drive. In: 2010 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium. University of California, San Diego, 21–24 June 2010Google Scholar
  8. Broggi A (2011) Paving the road to autonomous driving: a new challenge in vehicular robotics. Plenary talk. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. Shanghai, 9–13 May 2011Google Scholar
  9. Campbell BN, Smith JD, Najm WG (2003) Examination of crash contributing factors using national crash databases. National highway traffic safety admin., technical report, DOT-VNTSC-NHTSA-02-07, Oct 2003Google Scholar
  10. Card SK, Morgan TP, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 23–97Google Scholar
  11. Chin_Teng L, Hong-Zhang L, Tzai-Wen C, Chih-Feng C, Yu-Chieh C, Sheng-Fu L, Li-Wei K (2008) Distraction-related EEG dynamics in virtual reality driving simulation. In: IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems, ISCAS 2008, pp 1088–1091Google Scholar
  12. Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Neale VL, Petersen A, Lee SE, Sudweeks J, Perez MA, Hankey J, Ramsey D, Gupta S, Bucher C, Doerzaph ZR, Jermeland J, Knipling RR, (2006) The 100-car naturalistic driving study phase II – results of the 100-car field experiment, DOT HS 810 593, Contract or grant no.DTNH22-00-C-07007. April 2006Google Scholar
  13. Drews FA, Pasupathi M, Strayer David L, (2004) Passenger and cell-phone conversations in simulated driving. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 48th annual meeting. New Orleans, pp 2210–2212Google Scholar
  14. Drews FA, Yazdani H, Godfrey C, Cooper JM, Strayer DL (2009) Text messaging during simulated driving. Hum Factor: J Hum Factor Ergon Soc 51:762–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ference J, Szabo S, Najm WG (2007) Objective test scenarios for integrated vehicle-based safety systems. Washington, DC. http://www.umtri.umich.edu/content/obj_test_scen_ivbss.pdf
  16. Green M (2000) How long does it take to stop? Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times. Transp Hum Factor 2:195–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green M (2009a) Driver reaction time. http://www.visualexpert.com/Resources/reactiontime.html
  18. Green M (2009b) Perception-reaction time: is Olson (& Sivak) all you need to know? Collision. The International Compendium for Crash Research 4(2): 88–93Google Scholar
  19. Godthelp H, Farber B, Groeger J, Labiale G (1993) Driving tasks and environment. In: Michon JA (ed) Generic intelligent driver support. Taylor and Francis, London pp 21Google Scholar
  20. Hall J, Dudek CL (1994) Committee on user characteristics. In: Driver performance data book update: older drivers and IVHS. Transportation research circular 419. National Research Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Hick WE (1952) On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exp Psychol 4(1):11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ho C, Spence C (2005) Olfactory facilitation of dual-task performance. Neurosci Lett 389(1):35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hosking S, Young K, Regan M (2007) The effects of text messaging on young novice driver performance. In: Faulks IJ, Regan M, Stevenson M, Brown J, Porter A, Irwin JD (eds) Distracted driving. Australasian College of Road Safety, Sydney, pp 155–187Google Scholar
  24. Hyman R (1953) Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J Exp Psychol 45:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Just MA, Keller TA, Cynkar J (2008) A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak. Brain Res 1205:70–80, ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laberge-Nadeau C, Maag U, Bellavance F, Lapierre SD, Desjardins D, Messier S, Saïdi A (2003) Wireless telephones and the risk of road crashes. Accid Anal Prev 35(5):649–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laoufi M (2005) Development of a comprehensive vibration model for evaluation of rumble strips. In: Eskandarian A Masters thesis, The George Washington University, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Laux LF, Mayer DL (1993) Informational aspects of vehicle design. In: Peacock B, Karwowski W (eds) Automotive ergonomics. Tayler and Francis, London, pp 401–429Google Scholar
  29. Lee JD (2006) Driving safety. Reviews of human factors and ergonomics. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee JD et al (2009) Defining driver distraction, Chapter 3. In: Regan MA, Lee JD, Young KL (eds) Driver distraction: theory, effect and mitigation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 31–40Google Scholar
  31. MacAdam CC (2003) Understanding and modeling the human driver. Veh Syst Dyn 40, Nos. 1–3:101–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madden M, Lenhart A (2009) Teens and distracted driving-texting, talking and other uses of the cell phone behind the wheel. Pew Research center. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Teens-and-Distracted-Driving.aspx Washington, DC, 16 Nov 2009
  33. Mallis M, Maislin G, Konowal N, Byrne V, Bierman D, Davis R et al (2000) Biobehavioral responses to drowsy driving alarms and alerting stimuli. Final report to develop, test and evaluate a drowsy driver detection and warning system for commercial motor vehicle drivers sponsored by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Motor CarriersGoogle Scholar
  34. McKnight AJ, Adams BB (1970) Driver education ad task analysis. Volume I task descriptions, final report, contract no. FH 11-7336. Human Resource Research Organization, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  35. McKnight AJ, Adams BB (1970) Driver education ad task analysis. Volume II task analysis methods, final report, contract no. FH 11-7336. Human Resource Research Organization, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  36. Mehmood A, Easa MS (2009) Modeling reaction time in car following behavior based on human factors. World academy of science, engineering and technology issue 57, conference, Sept 2009, Article 122, pp 710. http://www.waset.org/journals/waset/v57/v57-122.pdf
  37. Michon JA (1985) A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do? In: Evans L, Shwing RC (eds) Human behavior and traffic safety. Plenum Press, New York, pp 485–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Michon JA (ed) (1993) Generic intelligent driver support. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Mironer M, Hendricks D (1994) Examination of single vehicle roadway departure crashes and potential IVHS countermeasures. DOT HS 808 144, Aug 1994Google Scholar
  40. Nakayasu H, Nakagawa M, Miyoshi T, Abe H (2010) Human cognitive reliability analysis on driver by driving simulator. In: IEEE 40th international conference on computers and industrial engineering (CIE). Awaji, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  41. Neale VL, Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Sudweeks J, Goodman M (2005) An overview of the 100 car naturalistic study and findings. In: Proceedings of the 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Olson PL, Sivak M (1986) Perception-response time to unexpected roadway hazards. Hum Factors 28(1):91–96Google Scholar
  43. Olson PL, Dewar R, Farber E (2010) Forensic aspects of driver perception and response, 3rd edn. Lawyers & judges, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  44. Ozguner U, Stiller C, Redmill K (2007) Systems for safety and autonomous behavior in cars: the DARPA grand challenge experience. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, advanced automotive technologies, Feb 2007, 95(2): 397–412Google Scholar
  45. Peacock B, Karwowski W (eds) (1993) Automotive ergonomics. Tayler and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Pickrell T, Ye T (2008) Driver electronic device use in 2008, NHTSA traffic safety facts, DOT HS 811 184. Washington, DC. (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pubs/811184.pdf)
  47. Ranney T (2008) Driver distraction: a review of the current state-of-knowledge. National Highway Safety Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  48. Reed N, Robbins R (2008) The effect of text messaging on driver behavior: a simulator study. Transport Research Laboratory, BerkshireGoogle Scholar
  49. Sigari MH (2009) Driver hypo-vigilance detection based on eyelid behavior, advances in pattern recognition, ICAPR ’09. In: Seventh international conference on advances in pattern recognition, 4–6 Feb 2009, pp 426–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sommer D, Golz M, Trutschel U, Edwards D (2009) Assessing driver’s hypovigilance from biosignals. In: Proceedings of the 4th European conference of the international federation for medical and biological engineering, Springer, Berlin, pp 152–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spence C, Ho C (2009) Cross modal information processing in driving. In: Castro C (ed) Human factors of visual and cognitive performance in driving. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 187–196Google Scholar
  52. Stevens A, Parks A (2001) ADVISERS-a strategic approach to ADAS development. In: IEEE international conference on advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), 17–18 Sep 2001, vol 483, pp 1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strayer DL, Drews FA, Johnston WA (2003) Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. J Exp Psychol Appl 9(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strayer DL, Drews FL, Crouch DJ (2006) A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors 48(2):381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strayer DL, Drews FL (2004) Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Hum Factor: J Hum Factor Ergon Soc 46:640–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tapani NL (2009) Human reaction times as a response to delays in control systems – notes in vehicular context. Kajaani Unit of Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu. V20091106. http://www.measurepolis.fi/alma/ALMA%20Human%20Reaction%20Times%20as%20a%20Response%20to%20Delays%20in%20Control%20Systems.pdf
  57. TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS 2009, DOT HS 811 402, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and AnalysisGoogle Scholar
  58. U.S. Department of Transportation 2009 http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811402EE.pdf
  59. Vahidi A, Eskandarian A (2003) Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 4(3):143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang J, Knipling RR (1994) Single vehicle roadway departure crashes: problem size assessment and statistical description. DOT HS 808 113Google Scholar
  61. Wilson FR, Sinclair JA, Bisson BG (1989) Evaluation of driver/vehicle accident reaction times. University of New Brunswick, Fredrickson, The transportation GroupGoogle Scholar
  62. Wierwille WW (1993) Visual and manual demands of in-car displays. In: Peacock B, Karwowski W (eds) Automotive ergonomics. Tayler and Francis, London, pp 299–319Google Scholar
  63. Wierwille WW (1999) Historical perspective on slow eyelid closure: whence PERCLOS?. In: Ocular measures of driver alertness, technical conference proceedings. Herndon, pp 130–143Google Scholar

Web Sites

  1. (wikipedia Buik Website) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buick
  2. Web Site: “DARPA Grand Challenge”; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Grand_Challenge
  3. Web site: US DoT Driving Distraction: http://www.distraction.gov/stats-and-facts/index.html
  4. Web site (Freie Universitat Berlin- Artificial Intelligence Lab, AutoNOMOS Labs, Prof. Rojas): http://autonomos.inf.fu-berlin.de/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Intelligent Systems ResearchThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations