Front End of the Fuel Cycle

  • Bertrand Barré
Reference work entry


This chapter describes the various industrial steps which constitute the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle, i.e., the complete set of operations needed to produce a functional fuel element ready to be loaded in a nuclear reactor. This chapter also provides data concerning the element uranium, its abundance and its most relevant properties. The exploration, mining, concentration and site rehabilitation processes are then described.

Light water reactors (LWR), which make the vast majority of the nuclear reactors operating today, and those under construction, cannot use “natural” uranium for their fuel: it must be “enriched” in isotope 235 and the enrichment process itself requires the uranium to be “converted” into a gaseous compound.

Once enriched to the required assay, uranium is then fabricated into solid ceramic “pellets,” piled into leaktight metallic “pins.” These pins are then “assembled” to constitute the fresh fuel element.

The chapter also provides additional information on MOX fuel assemblies used to recycle plutonium in LWR, as well as some data on plutonium and thorium.

One shall also find an explanation of the fascinating “Oklo Phenomenon,” which occurred almost 2 billion years ago in some uranium deposits of Gabon, in this chapter.

This chapter is expanded and updated from part of a previous Springer publication (Barré, 2005a).


Fission Product Fuel Assembly Natural Uranium Pressurize Water Reactor Light Water Reactor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bailly H, Ménessier D, Prunier C (1999) The nuclear fuel of pressurized water reactors and fast reactors – design and behaviour. Intercept Ltd., Bedfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Barré B (2005a) Nuclear fuel and fuel cycle. In energy technologies. Landolt-Börnstein VIII-3, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Barré B (2005b) Oklo, 2 billion years before fermi! GIFT Geophysical Information for Teachers Workshop, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  4. Cochran R, Tsoufalnidis N (1999) The nuclear fuel cycle: analysis and management. ANS, La Grange ParlcGoogle Scholar
  5. Maillet H et al (1980) Le laser technique et documentation. Lavoisier, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Marshall W (1981) Nuclear power technology – vol 2: Fuel cycle. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Naudet R (1991) OKLO: Des réacteurs nucléaires fossiles. Etude physique Eyrolles, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Nuclear Energy Data (1999) OECD/NEA, Mulineaux, FranceGoogle Scholar
  9. OECD (2008) Uranium, resources, production & demand. OECD/NEA-IAEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Patarin L et al (2002) Le cycle du combustible nucléaire. Collection Génie Atomique EDP-Sciences, Les Ulis, FranceGoogle Scholar
  11. Rigo L, Faron R (1995) Raffinage et conversion des concentrés d’uranium. Techniques de l’Ingénieur B3590:B3590.1-B3590.8Google Scholar
  12. Schäfer FP et al (1990) Dye lasers topics in applied physics, vol 1. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Valsardieu C (1997) Regards sur l’uranium. ESKAGoogle Scholar
  14. Villani S et al (1979) Uranium enrichment topics in applied physics, vol 35. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilson PD et al (1996) The nuclear fuel cycle – from ore to wastes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bertrand Barré
    • 1
  1. 1.INSTNChavilleFrance

Personalised recommendations