Skip to main content

Starlet Transform in Astronomical Data Processing

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging

Abstract

We begin with traditional source detection algorithms in astronomy. We then introduce the sparsity data model. The starlet wavelet transform serves as our main focus in this chapter. Sparse modeling, and noise modeling, are described. Applications to object detection and characterization, and to image filtering and deconvolution, are discussed. The multiscale vision model is a further development of this work, which can allow for image reconstruction when the point spread function is not known, or not known well. Bayesian and other algorithms are described for image restoration. A range of examples is used to illustrate the algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 679.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Further Reading

  1. Anscombe FJ (1948) The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data. Biometrika 15:246–254

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Benvenuto F, La Camera A, Theys C, Ferrari A, Lantéri H, Bertero M (2008) The study of an iterative method for the reconstruction of images corrupted by Poisson and Gaussian noise. Inverse Probl 24(035016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertero M, Boccacci P (1998) Introduction to inverse problems in imaging. Institute of Physics, Bristol

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertero M, Boccacci P, Desiderá G, Vicidomini G (2009) Image deblurring with Poisson data: from cells to galaxies. Inverse Probl 25:123006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertin E, Arnouts S (June 1996) Extractor: software for source extraction. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 117:393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bijaoui A (Apr 1980) Sky background estimation and application. Astron Astrophys 84:81–84

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bijaoui A, Rué F (1995) A multiscale vision model adapted to astronomical images. Signal Process 46:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buonanno R, Buscema G, Corsi CE, Ferraro I, Iannicola G (Oct 1983) Automated photographic photometry of stars in globular clusters. Astron Astrophys 126:278–282

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen SS, Donoho DL, Saunders MA (1999) Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM J Sci Comput 20(1):33–61

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Combettes PL, Wajs VR (2005) Signal recovery by proximal forward-backward splitting. Multiscale Model Simulat 4(4):1168–1200

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Da GS (1992) Costa basic photometry techniques. In: Howel SB (ed) ASP conference series 23, Astronomical CCD Observing and Reduction Techniques, vol 23. Astronical Society of the Pacific, p 90

    Google Scholar 

  12. Daubechies I, Defrise M, De Mol C (2004) An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint. Commun Pure Appl Math 57:1413–1541

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Davoust E, Pence WD (1982) Detailed bibliography on the surface photometry of galaxies. Astron Astrophys Suppl Seri 49:631–661

    Google Scholar 

  14. Debray B, Llebaria A, Dubout-Crillon R, Petit M (Jan 1994) CAPELLA: software for stellar photometry in dense fields with an irregular background. Astron Astrophys 281:613–635

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc B 39(1):1–38

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Djorgovski S (Dec 1983) Modelling of seeing effects in extragalactic astronomy and cosmology. J Astrophys Astron 4:271–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dupé F-X, Fadili MJ, Starck J-L (2009) A proximal iteration for deconvolving Poisson noisy images using sparse representations. IEEE Trans Image Process 18(2):310–321

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Engl HW, Hanke M, Neubauer A (1996) Regularization of inverse problems, vol 375 of Mathematics and its applications. Kuwer Academic

    Google Scholar 

  19. Figueiredo MA, Nowak R (2003) An EM algorithm for wavelet-based image restoration. IEEE Trans Image Process 12(8):906–916

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6:721–741

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Irwin MJ (June 1985) Automatic analysis of crowded fields. Monthly Notices Roy Astron Soc 214:575–604

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kron RG (June 1980) Photometry of a complete sample of faint galaxies. Astrophys J Suppl Ser 43:305–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurtz MJ (1983) Classification methods: an introductory survey. In: Statistical methods in astronomy. European Space Agency Special Publication 201, pp 47–58

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lefèvre O, Bijaoui A, Mathez G, Picat JP, Lelièvre G (1986) Electronographic BV photometry of three distant clusters of galaxies. Astron Astrophys 154:92–99

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lucy LB (1974) An iteration technique for the rectification of observed distributions. Astron J 79:745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maddox SJ, Efstathiou G, Sutherland WJ (Oct 1990) The APM galaxy survey – Part Two – Photometric corrections. Monthly Notices Roy Astron Soc 246:433

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mallat S (2008) A wavelet tour of signal processing, the sparse way, 3rd edn. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mallat S, Zhang Z (1993) Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans Signal Process 41(12):3397–3415

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Moffat AFJ (Dec 1969) A theoretical investigation of focal stellar images in the photographic emulsion and application to photographic photometry. Astron Astrophys 3:455

    Google Scholar 

  30. Molina R, Ripley BD, Molina A, Moreno F, Ortiz JL (Oct 1992) Bayesian deconvolution with prior knowledge of object location – applications to ground-based planetary images. Astrophys J 104:1662–1668

    Google Scholar 

  31. Murtagh F, Starck J-L, Bijaoui A (1995) Image restoration with noise suppression using a multiresolution support. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 112:179–189

    Google Scholar 

  32. Natterer F, Wûbbeling F (2001) Mathematical methods in image reconstruction. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Naylor T (May 1998) An optimal extraction algorithm for imaging photometry. Monthly Notices Roy Astron Soc 296:339–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Okamura S (1985) Global structure of Virgo cluster galaxies. In: ESO workshop on the virgo cluster of galaxies, pp 201–215

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pence WD, Davoust E (1985) Supplement to the detailed bibliography on the surface photometry of galaxies. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 60:517–526

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pierre M, Valtchanov I, Altieri B, Andreon S, Bolzonella M, Bremer M, Disseau L, Dos Santos S, Gandhi P, Jean C, Pacaud F, Read A, Refregier A, Willis J, Adami C, Alloin D, Birkinshaw M, Chiappetti L, Cohen A, Detal A, Duc P, Gosset E, Hjorth J, Jones L, LeFevre O, Lonsdale C, Maccagni D, Mazure A, McBreen B, McCracken H, Mellier Y, Ponman T, Quintana H, Rottgering H, Smette A, Surdej J, Starck J, Vigroux L, White S (Sept 2004) The XMM-LSS survey. Survey design and first results. J Cosmol Astropart Phys 9:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Richardson WH (1972) Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. J Opt Soc Am 62:55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shepp LA, Vardi Y (1982) Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging MI-2:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  39. Starck J-L, Aussel H, Elbaz D, Fadda D, Cesarsky C (1999) Faint source detection in ISOCAM images. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 138:365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Starck J-L, Bijaoui A, Murtagh F (1995) Multiresolution support applied to image filtering and deconvolution. CVGIP: Graph Models Image Process 57:420–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Starck J-L, Elad M, Donoho DL (2004) Redundant multiscale transforms and their application for morphological component analysis. Adv Imaging Electron Phys 132:287–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Starck J-L, Fadili J, Murtagh F (2007) The undecimated wavelet decomposition and its reconstruction. IEEE Trans Image Process 16:297–309

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Starck J-L, Murtagh F (1994) Image restoration with noise suppression using the wavelet transform. Astron Astrophys 288:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  44. Starck J-L, Murtagh F (1998) Automatic noise estimation from the multiresolution support. Publ Astron Soc Pacific 110:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Starck J-L, Murtagh F (2002) Astronomical image and data analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. Starck J-L, Murtagh F (2006) Astronomical image and data analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  47. Starck J-L, Murtagh F, Bijaoui A (1998) Image processing and data analysis: the multiscale approach. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Starck J-L, Pierre M (1998) Structure detection in low intensity X-ray images. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 128:397–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Starck J-L, Siebenmorgen R, Gredel R (1997) Spectral analysis by the wavelet transform. Astrophys J 482:1011–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Starck J-L, Murtagh F, Fadili J (2010) Sparse image & signal processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Takase B, Kodaira K, Okamura S (1984) An atlas of selected galaxies. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  52. Thonnat M (1985) INRIA Rapport de Recherche. Centre Sophia Antipolis, No. 387 Automatic morphological description of galaxies and classification by an expert system

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tikhonov AN, Goncharski AV, Stepanov VV, Kochikov IV (1987) Ill-posed image processing problems. Soviet Phys Doklady 32:456–458

    Google Scholar 

  54. Watanabe M, Kodaira K, Okamura S (1982) Digital surface photometry of galaxies toward a quantitative classification. I. 20 galaxies in the Virgo cluster. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 50:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang B, Fadili MJ, Starck J-L (2008) Wavelets, ridgelets and curvelets for Poisson noise removal. IEEE Trans Image Process 17(7):1093–1108

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Starck, JL., Murtagh, F., Bertero, M. (2011). Starlet Transform in Astronomical Data Processing. In: Scherzer, O. (eds) Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92920-0_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics