Skip to main content

Accuracy of Surface Topography Characterization Tools

  • Reference work entry
  • 509 Accesses

Synonyms

MU, Measurement uncertainty; P, Precision

Definition

Accuracy refers to the ability to correctly estimate true value. In surface topography characterization, the accuracy can be interpreted as the capability of an instrument as a whole to predict the true value of a surface topography. The measure of an instrument’s accuracy can be literally indicated using the statistical relation of the measured values with respect to the true value of a calibrated standard.

Scientific Fundamentals

Accuracy Versus Precision

In the fields of engineering, industry, and statistics, the accuracy of a measurement system is the degree of correctness of the measurement in quantity to its true value. The precision of a measurement system, also called repeatability, is the degree to which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions show the same results (Hofer et al. 2005). Although the two words are metaphorical when in use, they are contrary in the context of scientific approach. A...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   3,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • G.F. Batalha, M.S. Filho, Quantitative characterization of the surface topography of cold rolled sheets – new approaches and possibilities. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 113, 732–738 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bhushan (ed.), Handbook of Micro/Nanotribology (CRC-Press, BocaRaton, FL, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.T. Bray, S.H. Cohen, M.L. Lightbody (eds.), Atomic Force Microscopy/Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (Springer, New York, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yh Chen, Wh Huang, Some issues on atomic force microscopy based surface characterization. Optoelectron Lett 3, 129–132 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Chen, G.M. Brown, M. Song, Overview of three-dimensional shape measurement using optical methods. Opt Eng 39, 10–22 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Conroy, J. Armstrong, A comparison of surface metrology techniques. J. Phys.: Confer Ser 13, 458–465 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Dalton, Reverse engineering using laser metrology. Sensor. Rev. 18, 92–96 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hariharan, Handbook of Optics, Interferometers, Chapter 21 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hofer, G. Strauß, K. Koulechov, A. Dietz, Computer assisted radiology and surgery – evaluating cas-systems, in CARS 2005: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, volume 1281 of International Congress Series, (Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery and Elsevier, Amsterdam, May 2005) pp 548–552

    Google Scholar 

  • H.-J. Jordan, M. Wegner, H. Tiziani, Highly accurate non-contact characterization of engineering surfaces using confocal microscopy. Meas. Sci. Technol 9, 1142–1151 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keithley Instruments, Low Level Measurements (Keithley Instruments, Inc., Cleveland, OH, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.S. Kohles, M.B. Clark, C.A. Brown, J.N. Kenealy, Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 19, 510–516 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Natarajan, C.Q. Cui, D.P. Poener, M.K. Radhakrishnan, Applications of atomic force microscopy for semiconductor device and package characterization. in Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, Proceedings of the 1997 6th International Symposium, (IPFA ’97, Singapore, July 1997) pp 275–279

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Ohlsson, A. Wihlborg, H. Westberg, The accuracy of fast 3d topography measurements. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manufact. 41, 1899–1907 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • G.W. Stachowiak, P. Podsiadlo, Classification of tribological surfaces. Tribol. Int. 37, 211–217 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Stout, Three Dimensional Surface Topography: Measurement Interpretation and Applications (Penton Press, London, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. N. Taylor, C. E. Kuyatt, Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. in Technical report, NIST Technical Note 1297, (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Udupa, M. Singaperumal, R.S. Sirohi, M.P. Kothiyal, Characterization of surface topography by confocal microscopy: I. principles and the measurement system. Meas. Sci. Technol. 11, 305–314 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Whitehouse, Surface metrology. Meas. Sci. Technol. 8, 956–972 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Wilson, Confocal Microscopy (Academic Press, London, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Windecker, High resolution optical sensor for the inspection of engine cylinder walls. Optik 112, 407–412 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sirichanok Chanbai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Chanbai, S., Weber, M. (2013). Accuracy of Surface Topography Characterization Tools. In: Wang, Q.J., Chung, YW. (eds) Encyclopedia of Tribology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_298

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics