Skip to main content

Cochlear Implantation and Quality of Life in Deafness

  • Reference work entry
  • 221 Accesses

Abstract:

In this chapter the assessment of quality of life in deaf people with a Cochlear Implant (CI) is discussed. First the background on this topic is elaborated on in the introduction. In the main text, the history of cochlear implantation and the system of a cochlear implant are depicted and shortly some indications to implant are given. The actual part in which the quality of life in CI patients is discussed, can be divided in several parts. At the outset, the overall quality of life in this particular population is mentioned together with some results. Afterwards, diverse disease specific instruments for the field of cochlear implantation are mentioned. Hereby we discuss the instrument itself, the statistics, the results and conclude with why to (or not to) use the instrument in the CI population. The instruments that are pointed out are: the Assessment of Mainstream Performance (AMP), the Glasgow (Children’s) Benefit Inventory (G-C-BI), the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), the Parental Perspectives (PP) and the Screening Instrument For Targeting Educational Risk (SIFTER). Finally, some of the widely used generic instruments in CI recipients are given. The most important are the medical outcome study Short Form 36 (SF36), the Health Utility Index mark 3 (HUI3) and the Pediatrics Quality of Life (PedsQL). Recommendations are given in the end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   3,000.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AMP:

assessment of mainstream performance

AMP-E:

assessment of mainstream performance elementary school

AMP-K:

assessment of mainstream performance kindergarten

CI:

cochlear implant

dBHL:

deciBel hearing level

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

GBI:

Glasgow benefit inventory

GCBI:

Glasgow children’s benefit inventory

HA:

hearing aid

HRQOL:

health related quality of life

HUI2:

health utility index mark 2

HUI3:

health utility index mark 3

MCS:

mental component summary score

NCIQ:

Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire

PCS:

physical component summary score (PCS)

PedsQL:

pediatrics quality of life

PP:

parental perspectives questionnaire

QOL:

quality of life

SD:

standard deviation

SF36:

medical outcome study Short Form 36

SIFTER:

Screening Identification For Targeting Educational Risk

References

  • Admiraal RJ. (1989). Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 133: 1913–1915.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson KL. (1989). SIFTER Screening Identification for Targeting Educational Risk in Children Identified by Hearing Screening or who have Minimal Hearing Loss. The interstate printers and publishers, Danville, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson KL, Matkin ND. (1996). Preschool Screening Identification for Targeting Educational Risk. The educational audiology Association, Westminster, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archbold SM, Lutman ME, Gregory S, O'Neill C, Nikolopoulos TP. (2002). Deafness Educ Int. 4: 12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng AK, Rubin HR, Powe NR, Mellon NK, Francis HW, Niparko JK. (2000). JAMA. 284: 850–856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chmiel R, Sutton L, Jenkins H. (2000). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 185: 103–105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chute PM, Nevins ME, Parisier SC. (2004). Assessing Mainstream Performance in Children with Cochlear Implants Conference Proceeding. Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen NL. (2004). Audiol Neurootol. 9: 197–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen SM, Labadie RF, Dietrich MS, Haynes DS. (2004). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 131: 413–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper HR, Carpenter L, Aleksy W, Booth CL, Read TE, Graham JM, Fraser JG. (1989). J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 18: 22–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Damen GW, Oever van den-Goltstein M, Langereis MC, Chute PM, Mylanus EAM. (2006). Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 115: 542–552.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damen GW, Beynon AJ, Krabbe PF, Mulder JJ, Mylanus EA. (2007a). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 136: 597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damen GW, Hoffer MMR, Hoekstra CC, Mylanus EA. (2006b). Stem,- Spraak- en Taalpathologie (Dutch). 14: 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damen GW, Krabbe PF, Archbold SM, Mylanus EA. (2007b). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 71: 425–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damen GW, Langereis MC, Snik AF, Chute PM, Mylanus EA. (2007c). Otol Neurotol. 28: 463–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damen GW, Pennings RJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA. (2006a). Laryngoscope. 116: 723–728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijourno A, Eyries C. (1957). Press Med. 35: 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dujardin A, Sloovere de M, Raeve de L. (2003). Kinderen met een Cochleaire Inplant: meningen en ervaringen van ouders [Dutch]. Antwerp, Belgium, pp. 26–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiser C. (2007). Arch Dis Child. 92: 379–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S, Denton M, Boyle M. (2002). Med Care. 40: 113–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration's, cochlear implant. (2006). Internet Communication Available at: www.fda.com

  • Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. (2001). Ann Med. 33: 375–384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garabedian EN. (1992). Rev Infirm. 42: 44–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grutters JP, Joore MA, Verschuure H, Dreschler WA, Anteunis LJ. (2007). Qual Life Res. 16: 1439–1449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den P. Broek (2000). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 123: 756–765.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinderink JB, Mens LH, Brokx JP, Van Den P. Broek (1995). Laryngoscope. 105: 618–622.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. (2003). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 1: 54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • House W, Berliner K. (1991). Cochlear implants: From idea to clinical practice. In: Cooper H (ed.) Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide. Whurr Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen YJ, Bal R, Bruijnzeels M, Foets M, Frenken R. (2006). BMC Health Serv Res. 6: 160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klop WM, Boermans PP, Ferrier MB, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM, Frijns JH. (2008). Otol Neurotol. 29(5): 615–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klop WM, Briaire JJ, Stiggelbout AM, Frijns JH. (2007). The Laryngoscope 117: 1982–1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson JF, Johnson A, Murray KT. (2006). Br J Health Psychol. 11: 279–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krabbe PF, Hinderink JB, Van Den P. Broek (2000). Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 16: 864–873.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubba H, Swan IR, Gatehouse S. (2004). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 113: 980–986.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mo B, Lindbaek M, Harris S. (2005). Ear Hear. 26: 186–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niparko JK, Blankenhorn R. (2003). Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 9: 267–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes T, Pretzlik U. (2003). An Independent Assessment and Evaluation of a Profile from Parents of Children with a Cochlear Implant. Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill C, Lutman ME, Archbold SM, Gregory S, Nikolopoulos TP. (2004). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 68: 149–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings RJ, Damen GW, Snik AF, Hoefsloot L, Cremers CW, Mylanus EA. (2006). Laryngoscope. 116: 717–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. (1996). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 105: 415–422.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M, Skarr D. (2003). Ambul Pediatr. 3: 329–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. (2001). Med Care. 39: 800–812.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. (1999). Med Care. 37: 126–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Wuyts FL, Cochet E, Hofkens A, Van de Heyning PH. (2005). Otol Neurotol. 26: 188–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vlahovic S, Sindija B. (2004). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 68: 1167–1174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. (1992). Med Care. 30: 473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley S, Jahnke M, Meinzen-Derr J, Choo D. (2005). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 69: 791–798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Damen, G.W.J.A., Mylanus, E.A.M., Snik, A.F.M. (2010). Cochlear Implantation and Quality of Life in Deafness. In: Preedy, V.R., Watson, R.R. (eds) Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_226

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_226

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-78664-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-78665-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics