Skip to main content

National Sign Languages and Language Policies

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Language and Education

Introduction

On 27 June 1999, 4,000 people marched through London in support of British Sign Language (BSL), demanding its recognition as the language of the British Deaf community and asserting the right of Deaf children to be educated in a bilingual environment with BSL as the language of instruction ( Deaf History Journal, 1999). While the British Deaf were marching, the Parliament of Thailand was in the process of formally recognizing Thai Sign Language as a fully fledged language, as the first language of Thai deaf people, and as the language through which Thai deaf people should be educated in a bilingual environment. By late March 2005, the British Deaf community were celebrating the fact that the government had recognized the existence of BSL Footnote 1but were fervent about the need to continue agitating to have BSL legalized so that BSL users have the legal right to use it, “bringing years of language discrimination to an end,” indeed for BSL to be recognized as “the UK's...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    BSL was recognized as an official British language by the UK government on 18 March 2003, but it does not have any legal protection.

  2. 2.

    “SIGNMatters” is a newsletter of the British Deaf Association.

  3. 3.

    See WFD web site ( http://www.wfdeaf.org/) for their response and for other documents relating to sign languages.

  4. 4.

    See in particular the chapters by May ( 2006) on the impact of nationalism on minority rights; by Skutnabb‐Kangas ( 2006) on language policies and linguistic human rights; by Reagan ( 2006) on language planning and sign languages; and by Phillipson ( 2006) on language policy and linguistic imperialism.

References

  • Ahlgren, I.: 1990, ‘Sign language in deaf education’, in S. Prillwitz and T. Vollhaber (eds.), Sign Language Research and Application: Proceedings of the International Congress, Hamburg, 1990, Signum Press, Hamburg, 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlgren, I. and Hylenstam, K. (eds.): 1994, Bilingualism in Deaf Education, Signum Press, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B.: 1991, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, B. and Wallin, L.: 1990, ‘Sign language research and the deaf community’, in S. Prillwitz and T. Vollhaber (eds.), Sign Language Research and Application: Proceedings of the International Congress, Hamburg, 1990, Signum Press, Hamburg, 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouvet, D.: 1990, The Path to Language: Bilingual Education for Deaf Children, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, J. and Miller, D.: 2000, ‘Maintaining, developing and sharing the knowledge and potential embedded in all our languages and cultures: On linguists as agents of epistemic violence’, in R. Phillipson (ed.), Rights to Language: Equity, Power and Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London,

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, J. and Miller, D.: 2002, Damned for Their Difference: The Cultural Construction of “the Disabled” and of the Deaf as “Disabled”. A Sociological History, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, J. and Miller, D.: 2004, ‘The cultural construction of linguistic incompetence through schooling: Deaf education and the transformation of the linguistic environment in Bali, Indonesia’, Sign Language Studies 5(1), 6–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branson, J., Miller, D., and Marsaja, G.: 1999, ‘Sign languages as a natural part of the linguistic mosaic: The impact of deaf people on discourse forms in North Bali, Indonesia’, in Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, DC, 109–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson, D. and Lemay, S.: 1996, Social Justice and Language Policy in Education: The Canadian Research, OISE Press, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Carpentier, A.L.: 1995, Deaf Education in Developing Countries, Paper presented at the 18th International Congress on Education of the Deaf, Tel Aviv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaf History Journal: 1999, ‘BSL March: Its historical significance’, Deaf History Journal, Vol. 3 No. 1, August, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J.: 1985, Language, Society, and Identity, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B.: 1990, ‘Trends in the progress towards bilingual education for deaf children in Denmark’, in S. Prillwitz and T. Vollhaber (eds.), Sign Language Research and Application: Proceedings of the International Congress, Hamburg, 1990, Signum Press, Hamburg, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiling, K.: 1995, The Development of Deaf Children: Academic Achievement Levels and Social Processes, Signum Press, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.E.: 1994, ‘Sign language and the concept of deafness in a traditional Yucatec Mayan village’, in C.J. Erting, R.C. Johnson, D.L. Smith, and D. Snider (eds.), The Deaf Way, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, DC, 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., Liddle, S., and Erting, C.: 1989, Unlocking the Curriculum: Principles for Achieving Access in Deaf Education, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen, M.: 2000, ‘The linguistic human rights of sign language users’, in R. Phillipson (ed.), Rights to Language: Equity, Power and Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane H. (ed) and F. Philip (Trans), 1984, The Deaf Experience: Classics in Language and Education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H.: 1988, When the Mind Hears: A History of the Deaf, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H.: 1992, The Mask of Benevolence: Disabling the Deaf Community, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. (ed.): 1995, Bilingual Teaching of Deaf Children in Denmark—Description of a Project 1982–1992, Døveskolernes Materialecenter, Aalborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahshie, S.N.: 1995, Educating Deaf Children Bilingually—With Insights and Applications from Sweden and Denmark, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, S.: 2006, ‘Language policy and minority rights’, in T. Ricento (ed.), Language Policy: Theory and Method, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, C.: 1992, Dictionary of Southern African Signs for Communicating with the Deaf, Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (ed.): 2000, Rights to Language: Equity, Power and Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R.: 2006, ‘Language policy and linguistic imperialism’, in T. Ricento (ed.), Language Policy: Theory and Method, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, G. and Jones, L.: 1990, ‘Social policy survey of deaf people in Europe’, in J. Kyle (ed.), Deafness and Sign Language into the 1990's: Ongoing Research Work in the Bristol Programme, Deaf Studies Trust, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, T.: 2006, ‘Language policy and sign languages’, in T. Ricento (ed.), Language Policy: Theory and Method, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (ed.): 2006, Language Policy: Theory and Method, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sign Language Studies: 2003, “Special issue on Dictionaries and Lexicography, Part II: The Development of National Sign Language Dictionaries”, Sign Language Studies, 3:4 Gallaudet University Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb‐Kangas, T.: 2000, Linguistic Genocide in Education—or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb‐Kangas, T.: 2005, Sign Languages—How the Deaf (and other Sign Language users) are Deprived of their Linguistic Rights, http://www.terralingua.org/DeafHR.html

  • Skutnabb‐Kangas, T.: 2006, ‘Language policy and linguistic human rights’, in T. Ricento (ed.), Language Policy: Theory and Method, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb‐Kangas, T. and Phillipson, R. (eds.): 1994, Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I.G. (ed.): 1988, The Education of the Deaf: Current Perspectives, Papers presented at the International Congress on Education of the Deaf 4–9 August, 1985, University of Manchester, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations 2005, Draft Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities, http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahc5reporte.htm

  • Wilbur R.B.: 1987, American Sign Language Lingustic and Applied Dimensions, College-Hill Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Branson, J., Miller, D. (2008). National Sign Languages and Language Policies. In: Hornberger, N.H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32875-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-30424-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics