Disparities in Women’s Health and Health Care

  • Sana Loue
  • Nancy Mendez
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48113-0_2

The United States is a large, multicultural society. The total U.S. population in the year 2000 was 281.4 million; women comprised 50.9% of this total. Focused attention on women’s health is critical for numerous reasons, in addition to the fact that women constitute slightly more than half of our population. First, various health concerns exist that are unique to women, such as ovarian and cervical cancer, while still other health concerns exist that impact women to a far greater degree than men, such as eating disorders and specific autoimmune disorders. Women are also major consumers of health care services and prescription drugs and often play a critical role in deciding matters related to the health care of family members. Finally, women and men differ biologically and with respect to health indicators. For instance, women tend to have higher rates of illness and disability than men, but also tend to live longer than men (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1995).

Significa...

Keywords

White Woman African American Woman Hispanic Woman Health Care Insurance Federal Poverty Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Ayanian, J. Z., & Epstein, A. M. (1991). Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 221–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baldwin, L. M., Grossman, D. C., Casey, S., Hollow, W., Sugarman, J. R., Freeman, W. L., et al. (2002). Perinatal and infant health among rural and urban American Indians/Alaska Natives. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1491–1497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell, C. A. (1991). Female homicides in United States workplaces, 1980–1985. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 729–732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berkman, C. S., & Zinberg, G. (1997). Homophobia and heterosexism in social workers. Social Work, 42, 319–332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bierman, A. S., Haffer, S. C., & Hwang, Y. T. (2001). Health disparities among older women enrolled in Medicare managed care. Health Catre Financing Review, 22, 187–198.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1995). Health United States, 1996–97. Hyattsville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS Publ. [PHS] 95-1232).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eagan, A. B. (1994). The women’s health movement and its lasting impact. In E. Friedman (Ed.), An unfinished revolution: Women and health care in America (pp. 15–27). New York: United Hospital Fund of New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fee, E. (1979). Nineteenth century craniology: The study of the female skull. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 53, 425–433.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaston, M. H. (2001). 100% access and 0 health disparities: Changing the health paradigm for rural women in the 21st century. Women’s Health Issues, 11, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glanz, K., Croyle, R. T., Chollette, V. Y., & Pinn, V. W. (2003). Cancer-related health disparities in women. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 292–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gorsky, R. D., Macgowan, R. J., Swanson, N. M., & Delagado, B. P. (1995). Prevention of HIV-infection in drug abusers: A cost analysis. Preventive Medicine, 24, 3–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hochberg, M. C., Petri, M., Machan, C., & Bias, W. B. (1991). HLA class II alleles DrB1*1501/15.3 and DqB1*0602 are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in African-Americans [abstract]. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 34, S140.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman, D. E., & Tarzian, A. J. (2001). The girl who cried pain: A bias against women in the treatment of pain. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 29, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kardestuncer, T., & Frumkin, H. (1997). Systemic lupus erythematosus in relation to environmental pollution: An investigation in an African-American community in north Georgia. Archives of Environmental Health, 52, 85–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan, S. S., Nessim, S., Gray, R., Czer, L. S., Chaux, A., & Matloff, J. (1990). Increased mortality of women in coronary artery bypass surgery: Evidence for referral bias. Annals of Internal Medicine, 112, 561–567.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kushner, R. (1975). Why me? New York: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matthews, W. C., Booth, M. W., Turner, J. D., & Kessler, L. (1986). Physicians’ attitudes towards homosexuality—A survey of a California medical society. Western Journal of Medicine, 144, 106–110.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mays, V. M., Yancey, A. K., Cochran, S. D., Weber, M., & Fielding, J. E. (2002). Heterogeneity of health disparities among African American, Hispanic, and Asian American women: Unrecognized influences of sexual orientation. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 632–639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Merton, V. (1996). Ethical obstacles to the participation of women in biomedical research. In S. M. Wolf (Ed.), Feminism and bioethics: Beyond reproduction (pp. 216–251). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skene, A. J. C. (1889). Education and culture as related to the health and diseases of women. Detroit: George S. Davis. (Cited in C. Smith-Rosenberg (1973). The cycle of femininity: Puberty to menopause in nineteenth century America. Feminist Studies, 1, 58–72. [Reprinted in Disorderly conduct: Visions of gender in Victorian America, by C. Smith-Rosenberg, 1985, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.])Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith-Rosenberg, C. (1973). The cycle of femininity: Puberty to menopause in nineteenth century America. Feminist Studies, 1, 58–72. (Reprinted in Disorderly conduct: Visions of gender in Victorian America, by C. Smith-Rosenberg, 1985, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith-Rosenberg, C. (1985). Disorderly conduct: Visions of gender in Victorian America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tobin, J. N., Wassertheil-Smoller, S., Wexler, J. P., Steingart, R. M., Budner, N., Lense, L., et al. (1987). Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery. Annals of Internal Medicine, 107, 19–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Verbrugge, L. M. (1990). Pathways of health and death. In R. D. Apple (Ed.), Women, health, and medicine in America: A historical handbook (pp. 11–79). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wiltbank, J. (1854). Introductory lecture for the Session, 1853–54. Philadelphia, PA: Edward Gratton. Cited in C. Smith-Rosenberg (1985). Disorderly conduct: Visions of gender in Victorian America, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Woodward, A., & Kawachi, I. (2000). Why reduce health inequalities? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 923–929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. 1.
    Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute. (2003). Cancer in women of color monograph. Bethesda, MD: Author. Available at http://www.cancercontrol.cancer.gov/womenofcolor/.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. (2000). Strategic research plan to reduce and ultimately eliminate health disparities: Fiscal years 2002–2006. Bethesda, MD: Author.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loue, S. (1999). Gender, ethnicity, and health research. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sana Loue
  • Nancy Mendez

There are no affiliations available