Skip to main content

SIMULATION Optimization

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science

INTRODUCTION

Optimization in operations research and the management sciences is generally identified with mathematical programming techniques, where analytical expressions for quantities of interest are available. The context of simulation optimization is a stochastic setting that defies analytical tractability, necessitating the use of simulation for estimating (through statistical sampling) system performance measures. The usual generic form of the problem is given as

(1)

where θ is the controllable set of parameters and Θ defines the constraint set on θ. We will assume throughout that the objective function is an expectation, that is,

with ω representing a sample path (or simulation replication) and L(θ, ω) the corresponding sample performance estimate. Objective functions of other forms (e.g., quantiles) can also be handled in a similar manner, and of course probabilities are simply expectations of indicator functions. In contrast to mathematical programming objective functions,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 532.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andradóttir, S. (1998). “Simulation Optimization,” Chapter 9 in Handbook of Simulation, ed. J. Banks, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barton, R.R. and Ivey, J.S. (1996). “Nelder-Mead Simplex Modifications for Simulation Optimization,” Management Science, 42, 954–973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertsekas, D.P. and Tsitsiklis, J.N. (1996). Neuro-Dynamic Programming, Athena Scientific, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fu, M.C. (1994). “Optimization via Simulation: A Review,” Annals Operations Research, 53, 199–248.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fu, M.C. and Hill, S.D. (1997). “Optimization of Simulation of discrete-event stochastic systems Discrete Event Systems via Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation,” IIE Transactions, 29, 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu, M.C. and Hu, J.Q. (1997). Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glasserman, P. (1991). Gradient Estimation Via Perturbation Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ho, Y.C. and Cao, X.R. (1991). Perturbation Analysis of Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ho, Y.C., Sreenevas, R., and Vakili, P. (1992). “Ordinal Optimization of DEDS,” Discrete-Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications, 2, 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A.C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson, S.H. and Schruben, L.W. (1989). “A Review of Techniques for Simulation Optimization,” Operations Research Letters, 8, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kleijnen, J.P.C. (1987). Statistical Tools for Simulation Practitioners, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kushner, H.J., and Yin, G.G. (1997). Stochastic Approximation Algorithms and Applications, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Law, A.M. and Kelton, W.D. (1991). Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pflug, G.C. (1996). Optimization of Stochastic Models: The Interface Between Simulation and Optimization, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Plambeck, E.L., Fu, B.-R., Robinson, S.M., and Suri, R. (1996). “Sample Path Optimization of Convex Stochastic Performance Functions,” Mathematical Programming, 75, 137–176.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rubinstein, R.Y. and Shapiro, A. (1993). Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Safizadeh, M.H. (1990). “Optimization in Simulation: Current Issues and the Future Outlook,” Naval Research Logistics, 37, 807–825.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sargent, R.G. (1991). “Research Issues in Metamodeling,” Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 888–893.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spall, J.C. (1992). “Multivariate Stochastic Approximation Using a Simultaneous Perturbation Gradient Approximation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 37, 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, W.N. and Nelson, B.L. (1991). “Using Common Random Numbers and Control Variates in Multiple-Comparison Procedures,” Operations Research, 39, 583–591.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this entry

Cite this entry

Fu, M.C. (2001). SIMULATION Optimization . In: Gass, S.I., Harris, C.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_958

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_958

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7827-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-0611-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics