This is a two-person game where neither player knows the other's decision until both are made. Imagine a situation where two criminals are isolated from each other and the police interrogator offers each the following deal: if the prisoner confesses and the confession leads to the conviction of the other prisoner, he goes free and the other prisoner gets 10 years in prison. If both confess, they each get 5 years. If neither confesses, there is enough evidence to convict both on a lesser offense and they both get one year. If there is no trust, then both will confess. If there is complete trust, neither will. Since complete trust is rare, when the game is played one time, players almost always defect. When the game is played repeatedly and there is a chance for a long-term reward, wary cooperation with a willingness to punish defection is the best strategy. This game illustrates many social and business contracts and is important for understanding group behavior, both cheating and...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gass, S.I., Harris, C.M. (2001). Prisoner's dilemma game . In: Gass, S.I., Harris, C.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_797
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_797
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7827-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-0611-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive