Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

BATTLE MODELING

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science

  • 76 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 532.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ancker, C.J., Jr. (1994). An Axiom Set (Laws) for a Theory of Combat, Technical Report, Systems Engineering, University of So. California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bracken, J., Falk, J.E., and Miercort, F.A. (1974). A Strategic Weapons Exchange Allocation Model, Serial T-325. School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dewar, J.A., Gillogly, J.J., and Junessa, M.L. (1991). Non-Monotonicity, Chaos and Combat Models, R-3995-RC. RAND, Santa Monica, California.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dupuy, T. N. (1985). Numbers, Predictions & War. Hero Books, Fairfax, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engel, J.H. (1954). “A Verification of Lanchester's Law,” Operations Research 2, 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hartley, D.S., III (1991). Predicting Combat Effects, K/DSRD-412. Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Helmbold, R.L. (1961). Historical Data and Lanchester's Theory of Combat, AD 480 975, CORG-SP-128.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helmbold, R.L. (1964). Historical Data and Lanchester's Theory of Combat, Part II, AD 480 109, CORG-SP-190.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helmbold, R.L. (1971). Decision in Battle: Breakpoint Hypotheses and Engagement Termination Data, AD 729 769. Defense Technical Information Center, Alexandria, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helmbold, R.L. (1990). Rates of Advance in Historical Land Combat Operations, CAA-RP-90-1. Concepts Analysis Agency, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herndon, S.K. (1993). TRADOC Analysis Command Research on VIC Variability, Technical Document TRAC-TD-0293. TRADOC Analysis Command, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  12. HQ US Army Armor School (1987). M-1 SIMNET Operator's Guide. Fort Knox, Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  13. HQ USAF/SAMA (1974). A Computer Program for Measuring the Effectiveness of Tactical Fighter Forces (Documentation and Users Manual for TAC CONTENDER) SABER GRAND (CHARLIE).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lanchester, F.W. (1916). “Mathematics in Warfare” in Aircraft in Warfare: The Dawn of the Fourth Arm, Constable and Company, London. (Reprinted in The World of Mathematics, ed. by J.R. Newman, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1956.)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Naval Ocean Systems Center (1992). RESA Users Guide Version 5.5, Vols 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shudde, R.H. (1971). “Contact and Attack Problems” in Selected Methods and Models in Military Operations Research, ed. by P.W. Zehna. Military Operations Research Society, Alexandria, Virginia, 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Speight, L.R. (1995). “Modelling the Mobile Land Battle: The Lanchester Frame of Reference and Some Key Issues at the Tactical Level,” Military Operations Research 1(3), 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Speight, L.R. (1997). “Modelling the Mobile Land Battle: Lanchester's Equations, Mini-Battle Formation and the Acquisition of Targets,” Military Operations Research, 3(5), 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Speight, L.R. and Rowland, D. (1999). “Modelling the Mobile Land Battle: Combat Degradation and Criteria for Defeat,” Military Operations Research, 4(3).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor, J.G. (1980). Force-on-Force Attrition Modeling. Military Applications Society, INFORMS, Linthicum, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor, J.G. (1983). Lanchester Models of Warfare, Vols I and II. Military Applications Society, INFORMS, Linthicum, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA

    Dean S. Hartley III

Authors
  1. Dean S. Hartley III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Part, Maryland, USA

    Saul I. Gass

  2. School of Information Technology & Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

    Carl M. Harris

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hartley, D.S. (2001). BATTLE MODELING . In: Gass, S.I., Harris, C.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7827-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-0611-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation