Mineralogy

1981 Edition

Amphibole group

  • W. Layton
  • M. M. Wilson
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30720-6_6

The term amphibole, derived from the Greek amphibolos meaning “ambiguous,” was first used by Haüy in 1801. The complex nature of amphibole compositions is easily appreciated when it is remembered that all the eight elements that, together, make up 98% of the earth's crust, are present in common amphiboles. As a result of this range of composition, the group has a multiplicity of names (see Leake, 1978).

The system of nomenclature used here is given in Fig. 1.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Berry, L. G., and Mason, B., 1959. Mineralogy. San Francisco: Freeman, 612 p.Google Scholar
  2. Burns, R. G., 1968. Crystal-field phenomena and iron enrichments in pyroxenes and amphiboles, Internat. Mineral. Assoc. Proc., 5th General Meeting, 170–183. Google Scholar
  3. Burns, R. G., and Greaves, C., 1971. Correlations of infrared and mossbauer site population measurement of actinolites, Am. Mineralogist, 56, 2010–2033.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, K. L., 1975. An experimental study of actinolite-cummingtonite phase relations with notes on the synthesis of Fe-rich anthophyllite, Am. Mineralogist, 60, 375–390.Google Scholar
  5. Deer, W. A.; Howie, R. A.; and Zussman, J., 1962. Rock-Forming Minerals, vol. 2, Chain Silicates. London: Longmans, 203–364.Google Scholar
  6. Ernst, W. G., 1968. Amphiboles: Crystal Chemistry, Phase Relations and Occurrence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 125p.Google Scholar
  7. Hallimond, A. F., 1943. On the graphical representation of the calciferous amphiboles, Am. Mineralogist, 28, 65–89.Google Scholar
  8. Klein, J., C., 1964. Cummingtonite-grunerite series: A chemical, optical and X-ray study, Am. Mineralogist, 49(7 and 8), 963–983.Google Scholar
  9. Layton, W., 1964. Factors governing the natural and synthetic occurrence of members of the amphibole group of minerals, Neues Jahrb. Mineral., Monatsh., 5, 135–147.Google Scholar
  10. Layton, W., and Phillips, R., 1960. The Cummingtonite problem, Mineralog. Mag., 32(251), 659–663.Google Scholar
  11. Leake, B. E., 1968. A catalog of analyzed calciferous and sub-calciferous amphiboles, together with their nomenclature and associated minerals, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper, 98, 1–210.Google Scholar
  12. Leake, B. E. (compiler), 1978. Nomenclature of amphiboles, Am. Mineralogist, 63, 1023–1052.Google Scholar
  13. Phillips, R., 1963. The recalculation of amphibole analyses, Mineralogical Mag., 33(263), 625–674.Google Scholar
  14. Phillips, R., and Layton, W., 1964. The calciferous and alkali amphiboles, Mineralog. Mag., 33(267), 1097–1109.Google Scholar
  15. Ross, M.; Papike, J. J.; and Shaw, K. W., 1969. Ex-solution textures in amphiboles as indicators of sub-solidus thermal histories, Mineral. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper 2, 275–299.Google Scholar
  16. Troll, G., and Gilbert, M. C., 1972. Fluorine-hydroxyl substitution in tremolite, Am. Mineralogist, 57, 1386–1403.Google Scholar
  17. Warren, B. E., 1930, The crystal structures and chemical composition of the monoclinic amphiboles, Zeitschr. Krist., 72, 493–517.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Layton
  • M. M. Wilson

There are no affiliations available