Advertisement

Technology Considerations in Health Professions and Clinical Education

  • Christian MoroEmail author
  • Zane Stromberga
  • James Birt
Living reference work entry
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Learning methods and pedagogy are shifting in clinical education. In particular, incorporating technology is increasingly important for training health professionals, where the necessary knowledge acquisition is typically much more experiential, self-directed, and hands-on than many other disciplines. Virtual or mixed reality interventions are becoming more accessible and can be delivered through various modes in a way that integrates directly into learning environments. However, there are often limits to the capacity of the technology, leaving educators unclear of which technologies are useful, and how they can be integrated into the learning environment. This chapter provides an overview of virtual and augmented reality; holograms and mixed reality; virtual dissection tables; social media; mobile applications and devices; 3D printing; online hosted video; simulation with technology enhanced learning; serious games; e-learning; and audience response software. We provide insight into the use of technology in health professions and clinical education by defining the types of technologies and exploring published use-cases across disciplines.

Keywords

Virtual reality Mixed reality Augmented reality Clinical education Technology-enhanced learning Medicine Medical education Blended learning 

References

  1. Abraham J, Wade DM, O’connell KA, Desharnais S, Jacoby R. The use of simulation training in teaching health care quality and safety: an annotated bibliography. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26:229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams SA. Blog-based applications and health information: two case studies that illustrate important questions for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) research. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79:e89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali AA, Miller ET. Effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing in health education: an integrative review. J Nurs Educ. 2018;57:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anand M, Singel T. A comparative study of learning with “anatomage” virtual dissection table versus traditional dissection method in neuroanatomy. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2017;4:177–80.Google Scholar
  5. Atlantis E, Cheema BS. Effect of audience response system technology on learning outcomes in health students and professionals: an updated systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29:173–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birt J, Moore E, Cowling M. Improving paramedic distance education through mobile mixed reality simulation. Australas J Educ Technol. 2017;33:69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birt J, Stromberga Z, Cowling M, Moro C. Mobile mixed reality for experiential learning and simulation in medical and health sciences education. Information. 2018;9:31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyle EA, Hainey T, Connolly TM, Gray G, Earp J, Ott M, Lim T, Ninaus M, Ribeiro C, Pereira J. An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Comput Educ. 2016;94:178–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Briz-Ponce L, García-Peñalvo FJ. An empirical assessment of a technology acceptance model for apps in medical education. J Med Syst. 2015;39:176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cai B, Rajendran K, Bay BH, Lee J, Yen CC. The effects of a functional three-dimensional (3D) printed knee joint simulator in improving anatomical spatial knowledge. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;12:610–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88:893–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chugh R, Ruhi U. Social media in higher education: a literature review of Facebook. Educ Inf Technol. 2018;23:605–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2010a;85:1589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cook DA, Garside S, Levinson AJ, Dupras DM, Montori VM. What do we mean by web-based learning? A systematic review of the variability of interventions. Med Educ. 2010b;44:765–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hamstra SJ. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306:978–88.Google Scholar
  17. Cowling M, Moro C. Holographic teachers were supposed to be part of our future. What happened? The Conversation. 2019. https://theconversation.com/holographic-teachers-were-supposed-to-be-part-of-our-future-what-happened-108500.
  18. Custer T, Michael K. The utilization of the anatomage virtual dissection table in the education of imaging science students. J Artic Radiat Sci Technol Educ. 2015;1:1–5.Google Scholar
  19. Delello JA, Mcwhorter RR, Camp KM. Integrating augmented reality in higher education: a multidisciplinary study of student perceptions. J Educ Multimed Hypermed. 2015;24:209–33.Google Scholar
  20. Dong C, Goh PS. Twelve tips for the effective use of videos in medical education. Med Teach. 2015;37:140–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan I, Yarwood-Ross L, HAIGH C. YouTube as a source of clinical skills education. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:1576–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gentry SV, Gauthier A, L’estrade Ehrstrom B, Wortley D, Lilienthal A, Tudor Car L, Dauwels-Okutsu S, Nikolaou CK, Zary N, Campbell J, Car J. Serious gaming and gamification education in health professions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e12994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, Wang W, Wark PA, Cotic Z, Rasmussen K, Sluiter R, Riboli-Sasco E, Tudor Car L, Musulanov EM, Molina JA, Heng BH, Zhang Y, Wheeler EL, AL Shorbaji N, Majeed A, Car J. Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: a systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4:010406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Girard C, Ecalle J, Magnan A. Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. J Comput Assist Learn. 2013;29:207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gorbanev I, Agudelo-Londoño S, González RA, Cortes A, Pomares A, Delgadillo V, Yepes FJ, Muñoz Ó. A systematic review of serious games in medical education: quality of evidence and pedagogical strategy. Med Educ Online. 2018;23:1438718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gough S. Educating for professional practice through simulation. In: Delany C, Molloy E, editors. Learning and teaching in clinical contexts: a practical guide. Chatswood: Elsevier; 2018.Google Scholar
  27. Gough S, Yohannes AM, Thomas C, Sixsmith J. Simulation-based education (SBE) within postgraduate emergency on-call physiotherapy in the United Kingdom. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:778–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gough S, Yohannes AM, Murray J. Using video-reflexive ethnography and simulation-based education to explore patient management and error recognition by pre-registration physiotherapists. Adv Simul (Lond). 2016;1:9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanson C, West J, Neiger B, Thackeray R, Barnes M, Mcintyre E. Use and acceptance of social media among health educators. Am J Health Educ. 2011;42:197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hosseini F, Oberoi V, Doroudi M, Vo L. A visual guide to foregut anatomy: using digital multimedia to enhance the learning of human gross anatomy. FASEB J. 2018;32:635.27.Google Scholar
  31. Hunsu NJ, Adesope O, Bayly DJ. A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Comput Educ. 2016;94:102–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jayakumar N, Brunckhorst O, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, Ahmed K. e-Learning in surgical education: a systematic review. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:1145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jenson CE, Forsyth DM. Virtual reality simulation: using three-dimensional technology to teach nursing students. Comput Inform Nurs. 2012;30:312–8; quiz 319–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jin W, Birckhead B, Perez B, Hoffe S. Augmented and virtual reality: exploring a future role in radiation oncology education and training. Appl Rad Oncol. 2017;6:13–20.Google Scholar
  35. Jones DB, Sung R, Weinberg C, Korelitz T, Andrews R. Three-dimensional modeling may improve surgical education and clinical practice. Surg Innov. 2016;23:189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kilmon CA, Brown L, Ghosh S, Mikitiuk A. Immersive virtual reality simulations in nursing education. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2010;31:314–7.Google Scholar
  37. Kim JH, Park H. Effects of smartphone-based mobile learning in nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Nurs Res. 2019;13:20–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klímová B. Mobile learning in medical education. J Med Syst. 2018;42:194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knight JF, Carley S, Tregunna B, Jarvis S, Smithies R, De Freitas S, Dunwell I, Mackway-Jones K. Serious gaming technology in major incident triage training: a pragmatic controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1175–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuehn BM. Virtual and augmented reality put a twist on medical education. JAMA. 2018;319:756–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lall P, Rees R, Law GCY, Dunleavy G, Cotič Ž, Car J. Influences on the implementation of mobile learning for medical and nursing education: qualitative systematic review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e12895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lim KHA, Loo ZY, Goldie SJ, Adams JW, Mcmenamin PG. Use of 3D printed models in medical education: a randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9:213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu C, Chen X, Liu S, Zhang X, Ding S, Long Y, Zhou D. The exploration on interacting teaching mode of augmented reality based on holoLens. In: Cheung SKS, Jiao J, Lee L-K, Zhang X, Li KC, Zhan Z, editors. Technology in education: pedagogical innovations. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maertens H, Madani A, Landry T, Vermassen F, Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R. Systematic review of e-learning for surgical training. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1428–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Malik HH, Darwood ARJ, Shaunak S, Kulatilake P, El-Hilly AA, Mulki O, Baskaradas A. Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res. 2015;199:512–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mathiowetz V, Yu CH, Quake-Rapp C. Comparison of a gross anatomy laboratory to online anatomy software for teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9:52–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mccallum S. Gamification and serious games for personalized health. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;177:85–96.Google Scholar
  48. Mcgaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 2010;44:50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mcgaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. Revisiting ‘A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009’. Med Educ. 2016;50:986–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller LM, Chang C-I, Wang S, Beier ME, Klisch Y. Learning and motivational impacts of a multimedia science game. Comput Educ. 2011;57:1425–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moro C, Gregory S. Utilising anatomical and physiological visualisations to enhance the face-to-face student learning experience in biomedical sciences and medicine. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1156:41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moro C, Hensen D. Engaging timid students: backchannel as a tool to provide opportunities for interactivity and engagement within the university classroom. Educ Technol Solut. 2017;81:38–41.Google Scholar
  54. Moro C, Kinash S. Developing online worksheets that work. Educ Technol Solut. 2012;52:52–54.Google Scholar
  55. Moro C, Mclean M. Supporting students’ transition to university and problem-based learning. Med Sci Educ. 2017;27:353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moro C, Periya S. Applied learning of anatomy and physiology: virtual dissection tables within medical and health sciences education. Bangkok Med J. 2019;15:121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moro C, Stromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017a;10:549–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moro C, Stromberga Z, Stirling A. Virtualisation devices for student learning: comparison between desktop-based (Oculus Rift) and mobile-based (Gear VR) virtual reality in medical and health science education. Australas J Educ Technol. 2017b;33:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moro C, Spooner A, Mclean M. How prepared are students for the various transitions in their medical studies? An Australian university pilot study. MedEdPublish. 2019;8:25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Narnaware Y, Neumeier M. Second-year nursing students’ retention of gross anatomical knowledge. Anat Sci Educ. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1906.
  61. Nelson C, Hartling L, Campbell S, Oswald AE. The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide No. 21. Med Teach. 2012;34:e386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’connor S, Andrews T. Mobile technology and its use in clinical nursing education: a literature review. J Nurs Educ. 2015;54:137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. O’connor S, Jolliffe S, Stanmore E, Renwick L, Booth R. Social media in nursing and midwifery education: a mixed study systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74:2273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Owen H. Simulation in healthcare education. An extensive history. Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;18:330.Google Scholar
  65. Petit DIT Dariel OJ, Raby T, Ravaut F, Rothan-Tondeur M. Developing the serious games potential in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:1569–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pimmer C, Mateescu M, Gröhbiel U. Mobile and ubiquitous learning in higher education settings. A systematic review of empirical studies. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;63:490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ramsey-Stewart G, Burgess AW, Hill DA. Back to the future: teaching anatomy by whole-body dissection. Med J Aust. 2010;193:668–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ricciardi F, De Paolis LT. A comprehensive review of serious games in health professions. Int J Comput Games Technol. 2014;2014:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Robert P, König A, Amieva H, Andrieu S, Bremond F, Bullock R, Ceccaldi M, Dubois B, Gauthier S, Kenigsberg P-A, Nave S, Orgogozo JM, Piano J, Benoit M, Touchon J, Vellas B, Yesavage J, Manera V. Recommendations for the use of serious games in people with Alzheimer’s disease, related disorders and frailty. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sterling M, Leung P, Wright D, Bishop TF. The use of social media in graduate medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2017;92:1043–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stirling A, Birt J. An enriched multimedia eBook application to facilitate learning of anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Su W, Xiao Y, He S, Huang P, Deng X. Three-dimensional printing models in congenital heart disease education for medical students: a controlled comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sural I. Augmented reality experience: initial perceptions of higher education students. Int J Instr. 2018;11:565–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sutherland J, Belec J, Sheikh A, Chepelev L, Althobaity W, Chow BJW, Mitsouras D, Christensen A, Rybicki FJ, La Russa DJ. Applying modern virtual and augmented reality technologies to medical images and models. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32:38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tuong W, Larsen ER, Armstrong AW. Videos to influence: a systematic review of effectiveness of video-based education in modifying health behaviors. J Behav Med. 2014;37:218–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang R, Demaria S Jr, Goldberg A, Katz D. A systematic review of serious games in training health care professionals. Simul Healthc. 2016;11:41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ. 2007;41:15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson RJBME. Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health Sciences and MedicineBond UniversityGold CoastAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Society and DesignBond UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations