Advertisement

Assessment of Student Learning in South Asia

Concerns and Challenges
  • Disha NawaniEmail author
  • Richa Goswami
Living reference work entry
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Global Education Systems book series (GES)

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is on understanding assessment practices, challenges, and related concerns and the ways in which they have been addressed in South Asia, more specifically in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Though the paper focuses on understanding assessment-related pedagogic concerns, allusions are briefly made to the social contexts of these countries. This becomes particularly important because despite variations between different socioeconomic and demographic groups within and across these countries, this region has had a long colonial history and is characterized by low literacy levels, poverty, high rates of unemployment, and huge disparities in incomes among people, etc. The underlying argument of this chapter is that assessment practices and value attached to its results are largely influenced by the socioeconomic structure of the country, where the number of aspirants outweighs the number of awards available in terms of either job opportunities or seats in Higher Educational Institutions. Exams in such contexts perform the social function of elimination of a large number of students at each level. The chapter draws its insights from a study of related documents and research studies available and is broadly organized into two sections. The first section systematically documents assessment-related practices, issues, and reforms in all the four countries and the second culls out concerns that are common across them.

Keywords

Assessment practices South Asia School assessment Large scale assessments Assessment reforms 

References

  1. Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin Ali, M., & Greenwood, J. (2018). The examination system in Bangladesh and its impact on curriculum, students, teachers and society. Language Testing in India, 8, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apple, M. W. (1990). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asian Development Bank. (2017). Innovative strategies for accelerated human resource development in South Asia: Student assessment and examination; Special focus on Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  5. Azim, F. (2018). An analysis of the secondary school certificate examination: The case of creative questions. In R. Chowdhary, M. Sarkar, F. Mojumdar, & M. M. Rashid (Eds.), Engaging in educational research: Revisiting policy and practice in Bangladesh (pp. 221–238). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the wash back concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Best, M., Knight, P., Lietz, P., Lockwood, C., Nugroho, D., & Tobin, M. (2013). The impact of national and international assessment programmes on education policy, particularly policies regarding resource allocation and teaching and learning practices in developing countries, 1959–1961. Final report. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  9. Burdett, N., & Everett, H. (2015). The impact of an examination board in Pakistan on student outcomes. Washington, DC. https://www.riseprogramme.org/sites/www.riseprogramme.org/files/publications/24_Burdett_RISEconferencepaper.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2019.
  10. CABE. (2014). Report of CABE sub-committee on assessment and implementation of CCE and NDP (under the RtE Act, 2009). New Delhi: MHRD.Google Scholar
  11. CAMPE. (2009). State of primary education in Bangladesh, education watch report. Dhaka: Campaign for Popular Education.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, D., Shahid, S., & Mujahid, M. H. (2008). Evaluation of the Aga Khan University Examination Board (AKU-EB). Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACL727.pdf. Accessed 14 Sept 2019.Google Scholar
  13. Dore, R. (1997). The diploma disease: Education, qualification and development. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  14. DPE. (2014). Bangladesh primary education annual sector performance report (ASPR) 2014. Dhaka: Government of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  15. Government of India. (1966). Report of the education commission(1964–66): Education and national development. New Delhi: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  16. Government of India. (1992). National Policy of Education 1986: With modifications undertaken in 1992. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development. http://www.ncert.nic.in/oth_anoun/npe86.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2019.
  17. Government of India. (2009). Right of children to free and compulsory education.Google Scholar
  18. Greaney, V., & Hasan, P. (1998). Public examinations in Pakistan: A system in need of reform. In Education and the state: Fifty years of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, P. (2010). Asia and Pacific secondary education system review series no. 1: Examinations system (p. 4). Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  20. Jain, P. S., & Dholakia, R. H. (2009). Feasibility of implementation of right to Education Act. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(25), 38–43.Google Scholar
  21. Jain, M., & Saxena, S. (2010). Politics of low cost schooling and low teacher salary. Economic & Political Weekly, 45(18), 79–80.Google Scholar
  22. Karopady, D. D. (2014). Does school choice help rural children from disadvantaged sections? Evidence from Longitudinal Research in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(51), 46–53.Google Scholar
  23. Lewin, K. & Little, A. W. (1982). Examination reform and educational change in Sri Lanka 1972–82: Modernisation or dependent underdevelopment? http://lst-iiep.iiep-unesco.org/cgi-bin/wwwi32.exe/[in=epidoc1.in]/?t2000=023645/(100)
  24. Khan, A. H., & Mahmood, N. (1997). Education in Pakistan: Fifty years of neglect. The Pakistan Development Review, 36(4), 647–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khushik, F., & Diemer, A. (2010). Critical analysis of education policies in Pakistan: A sustainable development perspective. Clermont Ferrand: University Clermont Ferrand, CERDI (Center of Studies and Research on Interntional Development).Google Scholar
  26. Kingdon, G. G. (2007). The progress of school education in India. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(2), 168–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar, K. (2005). Meek dictator: The paradox of teacher’s personality. In K. Kumar (Ed.), Political agenda of education: A study of colonialist and nationalist ideas. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Kumar, K. (2008). Partners in education? Economic and Political Weekly, 43(3), 8–11.Google Scholar
  29. Kumar, K. (2009). The challenge of quality. In P. Rustagi (Ed.), Concerns, conflicts and cohesions: Universalization of elementary education in India. New Delhi: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
  30. Little, A. W. (2003). Education for all: Policy and planning lessons from Sri Lanka (Researching the issues, no 46). London: DFID.Google Scholar
  31. Little, A. W. (2011). Education policy reform in Sri Lanka: The double edged sword of political will. Journal of Education Policy, 26(4), 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malik, I. A., Sarwar, M., & Imran, A. (2017). Quality and standardisation: A twin dilemma of public examinations at higher secondary school level in Pakistan. Islamabad: Federal Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education.Google Scholar
  33. MHRD. (1993). Learning without burden – Report of the national advisory committee appointed by the Ministry of Human Resource Development. New Delhi: MHRD.Google Scholar
  34. Ministry of Education, B. (2010). National education policy 2010. Dhaka: Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  35. MOFEPT. (2017). National education of policy 2017. Islamabad: Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training, Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  36. Nambissan, G. B. (2012). Private schools for the poor: Business as usual? Economic and Political Weekly, 47(41), 51–58.Google Scholar
  37. Nawani, D. (2012). What is learning and where is it happening. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII(32), 94–96.Google Scholar
  38. Nawani, D. (2013). Continuously and comprehensively evaluating children. Economic & Political Weekly, XLVIII, 33–40.Google Scholar
  39. Nawani, D. (2015). Learn without fear of failure, Hindustan Times.Google Scholar
  40. Nawani, D. (2017). Re-thinking assessments in schools. Economic and Political Weekly, L3, 37–42.Google Scholar
  41. Nawani, D. (2018a). Examination for elimination-celebrating fear and penalizing failure in. In K Kumar (Ed.), Routledge handbook of education in India-debates, practices and policies, South Asia edition. Routledge: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  42. Nawani, D. (2018b). Assessing ASER, 2019. Economic and Political Weekly, LIII(8), 14–17.Google Scholar
  43. Nawani, D. (2018c). CBSE leaks: To really reform India’s education system, we need to think beyond board exams. https://amp.scroll.in/article/874006/cbse-leaks-to-really-reform-indias-education-system-we-need-to-think-beyond-board-exams
  44. Nawani, D. (2019). ‘Why Cheat India’ and the ‘Filter’ of public examination. Economic and Political Weekly Engage, 54(9). https://www.epw.in/engage/article/filter-of-public-examination. Accessed 9 Sept 2019.
  45. NCERT (Ed.). (2005). National curriculum framework 2005. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.Google Scholar
  46. NEC. (2003). Proposal for a national policy framework on general education in Sri Lanka. Narahenpita: National Education Commission.Google Scholar
  47. Rao, S. (2017). Production of an ‘Educational’ city: Shadow education economy and re-structuring of Kota in India. In W. T. Pink & G. W. Norbit (Eds.), Second international handbook of education. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. SAHE. (2016). Education monitor; Assessment systems in Pakistan: Considerations of quality, effectiveness and use. Lahore: Society for the Advancement of Education.Google Scholar
  49. Sarangapani, P. (2009). The open classroom and its critics. In Concerns, conflicts and cohesions: Universalization of elementary education in India (pp. 191–209). New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Preet Rustagi (2008).Google Scholar
  50. Sedere, U. (2016). Education for sustainable development for a peaceful and sustainable Sri Lanka. In R. N. Forana & P. R. Kanaujia (Eds.), Reorienting educational efforts for sustainable development: Experiences from South Asia (pp. 179–197). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sedere, U., et al. (2014). Study on evaluation & the assessment system in general education in Sri Lanka. Colombo: National Education Commission.Google Scholar
  52. Souza, J. D., & Moore, T. D. (2017). Education in Sri Lanka. https://wenr.wes.org/2017/08/education-in-sri-lanka
  53. Srinivasan, M. V. (2015). Centralised evaluation practices: An ethnographic account of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in a government residential school in India. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 12(1), 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thachil, T. (2009). Neoliberalism’s two faces in Asia: Globalization, educational policies, and religious schooling in India, Pakistan, and Malaysia. Comparative Politics, 41(4), 473–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all; Education for all: Global monitoring report 2013–14. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000225660. Accessed 13 Sept 2019.
  56. Velaskar, P. (2010). Quality and inequality in Indian education: Some critical policy concerns. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 7(1), 58–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vellanki, V. (2015). Need to avoid binaries: Government vs private schools in ASER 2014. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(7), 24–26.Google Scholar
  58. World Bank. (2013). Seeding fertile ground: Education that works for Bangladesh. Education sector review. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/830371468212071486/text/806130ESW0BD0E00Box379859B00PUBLIC0.txt. Accessed on 27th Feb 2020.
  59. World Bank. (2016). Bangladesh: Ensuring education for all Bangladeshis. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2016/10/07/ensuring-education-for-all-bangladeshis. Accessed 18 Oct 2019.
  60. Young, M. F. D. (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationTata Institute of Social ScienceMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.School of EducationTISSDeonarIndia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Naureen Durrani
    • 1
  • Disha Nawani
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationNazarbayev UniversityNur-SultanKazakhstan
  2. 2.School of EducationTata Institute of Social ScienceMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations