Advertisement

Gifted, Talented and High-Achieving Students and Their Gifted Education in Mexico

  • Pedro Antonio Sánchez-EscobedoEmail author
  • Ana Karen Camelo-Lavadores
  • Angel Alberto Valdés-Cuervo
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

This chapter describes the emergence and the historical development of gifted education in Mexico. A review and a critical analysis of actual educational policies related to identification and intervention processes in this field is presented. To better understand social perceptions of the gifted, we distinguish between the concepts of gifted, talented and high-achieving students since these are often used interchangeably in Mexico. We analyse the relationship between the social perception of these students and the services and programs available for them. Research in this field is summarised and reviewed. We argue that gifted education in Mexico should be separated from special education, and that investment in and implementation of programs and provisions for this elite group of students must be considered as a vehicle of economic development and national security.

Keywords

Mexico Gifted Talented and high-achieving students 

References

  1. ACT Solutions for College and Career Readiness. (2009). The path to career success: High school achievement, certainty of career choice, and college readiness makes a difference. Issues in college success. Iowa City, IA: ACT.Google Scholar
  2. Andraca, A. (2006). Programas de becas estudiantiles. Experiencias latinoamericanas [Student scholarship programs. Latin American experiences]. París, France: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  3. Armenta, C. (2008). Educación incluyente para sobresalientes en las sociedades del conocimiento [Inclusive education for high achievers in the knowledge society]. International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 18(1), 109–131. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/654/65411190006.pdf
  4. Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2015). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students. In The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  5. Berlin, J. E. (2009). It’s all a matter of perspective: Student perceptions on the being labeled gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 31, 217–223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190903177580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolling, M., Otte, C. R., Elsborg, P., Nielsen, G., & Bertsen, P. (2018). The association between education outside the classroom and students’ school motivation. Result from a one school-year quasi-experiment. International Journal of Educational Research, 89, 22–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, E., & Wishney, L. (2017). Equity and excellence: Political forces in the education of gifted Students in the United States and abroad. Global Education Review, 4, 22–33. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137995.pdfGoogle Scholar
  8. Camelo-Lavadores, A. K. (2018). Percepción social del alumno con alto rendimiento académico [Social perception of high achieving students] (Doctoral thesis). Doctorate in Social Sciences, Autonomous University of Yucatan, Mérida Yucatán México.Google Scholar
  9. Camelo-Lavadores, A. K., Sánchez, P., & Pinto, J. (2017). Academic self-efficacy of high achieving student in Mexico. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6, 84–89.  https://doi.org/10.3430/jct.v6n2p84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrillo, P. (2012). Apoyos educativos en los centros de alto rendimiento académico de Yucatán [Educational support in the centers of high academic performance of Yucatan]. Unpublished master Thesis, Autonomous University of Yucatan, Yucatán, México.Google Scholar
  11. Castro, P., Oyanadel, C., Paez, A., & Quintanilla, R. (2000). Implicaciones de una educación especial para superdotados [Implications of a special education for the gifted]. Retrieved from http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Thebes/1663/pablo1.htm
  12. Center for Social Studies and Public Opinion. (2012). Práctica deportiva en México [Sports practice in Mexico]. Ciudad de México, México: CESOP.Google Scholar
  13. Center for Social Studies and Public Opinion. (2015). Evaluación del gasto educativo en México [Evaluation of educational spending in Mexico]. Ciudad de México, México: CESOP.Google Scholar
  14. Cervantes, D., Valadez, M., Valdés, A., & Tánori, J. (2018). Diferencias en autoeficacia académica, bienestar psicológico y motivación al logro en estudiantes universitarios con alto y bajo desempeño académico [Differences in academic self-efficacy, psychological well-being and achievement motivation in university students with high and low academic performance]. Psicología desde el Caribe, 35, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.14482/psdc.35.1.11154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chan, H., Frey, B., Gallus, J., & Torgler, B. (2014). Academic honors and performance. Labour Economics, 31, 188–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chávez, B. I., & Acle, G. (2018). Niños con altas capacidades: Análisis de las variables familiares implicadas en el desarrollo del potencial [Children with high capacities: Analysis of family variables involved in the development of potential]. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 16, 273–300. Retrieved from http://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/EJREP/article/view/2094
  17. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest minds. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  18. Covarrubias, P., & Marín, R. (2015). Evaluación de la propuesta de intervención para estudiantes sobresalientes: Caso Chihuahua, México [Evaluation ot the proposed intervention for gifted: Case Chihuahua, Mexico]. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 15(3), 1–32. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.sa.cr/pdf/aie/v15n3/1409-4703-aie-15-03-00206.pdf
  19. Deku, P. (2013). Teacher nomination of gifted and talented children: A study of basic and senior high schools in the Central Region of Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(18), 1–7. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/download/7815/7879
  20. DiFrancesca, D., Nietfeld, J. L., & Cao, L. (2016). A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 228–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edmunds, M. (2014). The financial gap between athletic scholarships and athlete expenses. Sport Management Undergraduate, 5, 1–38. Retrieved from https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com.mx/&httpsredir=1&article=1006&context=sport_undergrad
  22. Estévez, E., Parra-Pérez, L., González, E., Valdés, A., Durand, J., Lloyd, M., & Martínez, J. (2018). Moving from international ranking to Mexican higher education’s real progress: A critical perspective. Cogent Education, 5, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1507799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fajardo, V. (2003). Situación y desafíos de la enseñanza del arte en América Latina y el Caribe. In UNESCO (Ed.), Métodos contenidos y enseñanza de las artes en Latinoamérica y el Caribe [Content methods and teaching of the arts in Latin America and the Caribbean] (pp. 9–14). París, France: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001333/133377s.pdf
  24. Farkas, S., Duffett, A., & Loveless, T. (2008). High-achieving students in the era of no child left behind. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Fernández, A. (2002). La educación artística y musical en México: incompleta, elitista y excluyente [Artistical and musical education in Mexico: incomplete, elitist and exclusive]. Cuadernos Interamericanos de Investigación en Educación Musical, 2, 87–100. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/cem/article/view/7322
  26. Gagné, F. (2007). Ten commandments for academic talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 93–118.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986206296660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Granado, M. (2005). El niño superdotado [The gifted childen]. Madrid, Spain: Abecedario.Google Scholar
  28. Groen, J. A., & White, M. J. (2004). In state versus out of state: The divergence of interest between public universities and state government. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1793–1814.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubeco.2003.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gutiérrez, M. (2004). El valor del deporte en la educación integral del ser humano [The value of sport in the integral education of the human being]. Revista de Educación, (335), 105–126. Retrieved from http://www.revistaeducacion.mec.es/re335/re335_10.pdf
  30. Harper, S. R. (2009). Race, interest convergence and transfer outcomes for black male student athletes. New Directions for Community Colleges, 147, 29–37.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heredia, B., & Franco, E. (2014). La brecha de Talento en México y sus costos económicos [The talent gap in Mexico and its economic costs]. Ciudad de México, México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.Google Scholar
  32. Hernández, M. (2003). La capacidad sobresaliente. Una necesidad educativa especial en todos los sujetos [Outstanding ability A special educational need in all subjects]. Retrieved from http://quadernsdigitals.net/datos_web/articles/educar/numero11/capacidad.htm
  33. Hernández, L. (2015). Hablar inglés mejora sueldo y abre puertas [Speaking English improves your salary]. The Excelsior, pp. A6. Retrieved from https://www.excelsior.com.mx/nacional/2015/03/05/1011730
  34. Hertzog, N. (2003). Impact of gifted programs from the students’ perspectives. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 131–143.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ibarrola, M. (2012). Los grandes problemas del sistema educativo mexicano. Perfiles Educativos, 34, 16–28. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php? script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-26982012000500003&lng=es&tlng=es.
  36. Inter-American Development Bank. (2013). IDB country strategy with Mexico. Retrieved diciembre from http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=38281503
  37. Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psychological Science, 24, 648–659.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kool, A., Mainhard, M., Jaarsma, A., Brekelmans, M., & van Beukelen, P. (2016). Academic success and early career outcomes: Can honors alumni be distinguished from non-honors alumni? High Ability Studies, 27, 179–192.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2016.1238818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Likupe, G., & Mwale, M. (2016). The study of attributions of low achievers and high achievers about the perceived courses of their success and failure: The case of adolescent students in secondary school-Malawi. Journal of Child and Adolescent Behavior, 4, 2–4.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4494.1000312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lizcano, P., & Sánchez, P. (2016). Personality traits and life experiences influencing highly creative people: Six life stories. Journal of Special & Gifted Education, 3(1), 93–108.Google Scholar
  41. López-Aymes, G., & Acuna, S. R. (2010). Desarrollo emocional de estudiantes con altas capacidades [Emotional development of students with high capacities]. Ideacción, 31, 366–379.Google Scholar
  42. López-Aymes, G., Roger, S., & Durán, G. G. (2014). Families of gifted children and counselling program: A descriptive study in Morelos, Mexico. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 3, 54–62.  https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v3n1p54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. López-Nevárez, V. (2015). Programa apoyo a sobresalientes en el estado de Sinaloa: una atención oportuna al talento [Support program for outstanding students in the state of Sinaloa: Timely attention to talent]. Ra Ximhai, 11(3), 19–34. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/html/461/46135409002/
  44. Machts, N., Kaiser, J., Schmidt, F. T., & Muller, J. (2016). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 19, 85–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martín, S., Medrano, R., & Sánchez, P. (2005). Necesidades de capacitación de docentes y estudiantes de de educación primaria para la detección de niños con aptitudes y capacidades sobresalientes [Training needs of primary school teacher and students for the detection of children with oustanding aptitudes and capabilities]. Educación y Ciencia, 9(18), 55–66.Google Scholar
  46. McClarty, K. (2015). Early to rise: the effects of acceleration on occupational prestige, earnings, and satisfaction. In S. Assouline, N. Colangelo, J. VanTassel-Baska, & A. Lupkowski-Shoplike (Eds.), A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (pp. 171–180). Iowa City, IA: Belin-Blank Center.Google Scholar
  47. Mexican Senate. (2015, julio 12). Cobertura de educación superior en México inferior a la de otros países de América Latina: IBD [Higher education coverage in Mexico lower than that of other Latin American countries: IBD]. Retrieved noviembre from http://comunicacion.senado.gob.mx/index.php/informacion/boletines/21714-2015-07-11-00-01-22.html
  48. National Institute of Educational Evaluation (2016). Panorama Educativo de México 2016. Indicadores del Sistema Educativo Nacional. Educación Básica y Media Superior [Educational Panorama of Mexico 2016. Indicators of the National Educational System. Basic Education and High School]. Mexico: INEE.Google Scholar
  49. National Institute of Statistic and Geography. (2015). Encuesta Intercensal 2015 [Intercensal survey 2015]. Retrieved from http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/proyectos/enchogares/especiales/intercensal/
  50. Neber, H. (2004). Teacher identification of students for gifted programs: Nominations to a summer school for highly-gifted students. Psychology Science, 46(3), 348–362. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-05211-005
  51. Nechar, E., Sánchez, P., & Valdés, A. (2016). Desarrollo de un programa de orientación con padres de estudiantes sobresalientes [Development of an orientation program with parents of outstanding students]. In M. Valadez, G. López, M. Borges, J. Betancourt, & R. Zambrano (Eds.), Programas de intervención para niños con altas capacidades y su evaluación (pp. 119–126). Ciudad de México, México: Manual Moderno.Google Scholar
  52. Official Journal of Federation. (2013). Programa Sectorial de Educación 2013–2018 [Sectoral Education Program 2013–2018]. Ciudad de México, México: SEGOB. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5326569&fecha=13/12/2013
  53. Palacios, L. (2006). El valor del arte en el proceso educativo [The value of art in the educational process]. Reencuentro, (46), 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=34004607
  54. Pozón, J. (2014). Los estudiantes universitarios ante las actividades extracurriculares. Anduli Revista Andaluza de Ciencias Sociales, (13), 137–150.  https://doi.org/10.12795/anduli.2014.i13.08
  55. Reis, S., & Morales-Taylor, M. (2010). From high potential to gifted performance: encouraging academically talented urban students. Gifted Child Today, 33, 28–38.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107621751003300408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sánchez, P. (2008). Methods and procedures in screening gifted Mayan students, Gifted and Talented International, 23(1), 87–96. Retrieved from http://www.templeton fellows.org/projects/docs/screening_gifted_mayans.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sánchez, P. (2013). Forewords. In P. Sánchez (Ed.), Talent development around the world (pp. 19–28). Mérida, Yucatán, México: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.Google Scholar
  58. Sánchez, P., Acle, G., De Agüero, A., Jacobo, M., & Rivera. (2003). Aprendizaje y desarrollo. Estados del conocimiento en educación [Learning and development States of knowledge in education]. México: Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa.Google Scholar
  59. Sánchez, P., Cantón, M., & Sevilla, D. (1997). Compendio de educación especial [Special education compendium]. Ciudad de México, México: Manual Moderno.Google Scholar
  60. Sánchez, P., & Lisbona, M. (2018). Education and Nationalism in Mexico. In Nationalism and nationlaism movements: Global attitudes, emergin patterns and impact on immigration. New York, NY: Nova Sciences.Google Scholar
  61. Sánchez, P., & Medrano, R. (2010). Un test académico para la acreditación y el avance de la colocación (aceleración) de estudiantes sobresalientes en México [Academic test for the accreditacion and advanced location (acceleration) of gifted children in Mexico]. Ideaccion, 31, 1–8.Google Scholar
  62. Sánchez, P., Park, K., Hollingworth, L., Misiunieve, J., & Ivanova, L. (2014). A cross-comparative international study on the concept of wisdom. Gifted Education International, 30, 228–236.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429413486575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Secretariat for Research, Innovation and Higher Education Mexican. (2017). Secretaría de Investigación, Innovación y Educación Superior [Secretariat for Research, Innovation and Higher Education]. Retrieved from http://www.siies.yucatan.gob.mx/programas.php
  64. Secretary of Public Education. (2006). Propuesta de intervención: atención educativa a alumnos y alumnas con aptitudes sobresalientes [Intervention proposal: educational attention to students with outstanding aptitudes]. Retrieved from http://www.educacionepecial.sep.gob.mx/pdf/aptitudes/intervencion/Propuesta_inter.pdf
  65. Secretary of Public Education. (2010). Lineamiento para la acreditación, promoción y certificación anticipada de alumnos con aptitudes sobresalientes en educación básica [Guidelines for the accreditation, promotion and advance certification of students with outstanding skills in basic education]. Ciudad de México, México: SEP.Google Scholar
  66. Secretary of Public Education. (2012). Reporte de la Encuesta Nacional de Deserción en la Educación Media Superior [Report of the National Survey of High School Dropout]. Mexico: SEP.Google Scholar
  67. Secretary of Public Education. (2013). Informe sectorial 1: Educación física y deporte en el sistema educativo. Deporte Universitario [Sector report 1: Physical education and sport in the education system. University Sports]. Ciudad de México, México: SEP.Google Scholar
  68. Secretary of Public Education. (2016). Estadística del Sistema [System statistics]. Ciudad de México, México: SEP.Google Scholar
  69. Valadez, M., Borges, M., Ruvalcaba, N., Villegas, K., & Lorenzo, M. (2013). Inteligencia emocional y su relación con el género, desempeño académico y capacidad intelectual del alumnado universitario [Emotional intelligence and its relationship with gender, academic performance and intellectual abilities of undergraduates]. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(30), 395–412. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=293128 257005
  70. Valadez, M., Meda, R., & Zambrano, R. (2006). Identificación de ninos sobresalientes que estudian en escuelas públicas [Identification of gifted children in public school]. Revista de Educación y Desarrollo, 5, 39–45. Retrieved from http://www.cucs.udg.mx/revistas/edu_desarrollo/anteriores/5/005_Valadez.pdf
  71. Valadez, M., Valdés, A., Aguiñaga, L., Morales, J., Cervantes, D., & Zambrano, R. (2016). Diferencias en el locus de control y la motivación al logro en estudiantes de secundaria con altas habilidades intelectuales y promedio [Differences in locus of control and achievement motivation in high school students with high intellectual abilities and high average]. Revista de Educación y Desarrollo, 37, 33–38. Retrieved from http://www.cucs.udg.mx/revistas/edu_desarrollo/anteriores/37/37_Valadez.pdf
  72. Valadez, M., Valdés, A., Galan, M., López, G., Wendlant, T., & Reyes, A. (2015). Analysis of the scientific productivity of Mexican researchers on the topic of gifted students. British Journal of Education, 8(4), 216–226.  https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/16947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Valdés, A., Carlos, E., Vera, J., & Montoya, G. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas para medir relaciones familiares en adolescentes intelectualmente sobresalientes [Psychometric properties of an instrument to measure relationships family members in intellectually outstanding adolescents]. Pensamiento Psicológico, 10(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  74. Valdés, A., Sánchez, P., & Valadez, M. (2015). Gender differences in self-concept, locus of control, and goal orientation in Mexican high-achieving students. Gifted and Talented International, 19(1–2), 19–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Valdés, A., Sánchez, P., & Yáñez, A. (2013). Perfiles de estudiantes mexicanos con aptitudes intelectuales sobresalientes [Psychological profiles of Mexican gifted students]. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 16(1), 25–33.Google Scholar
  76. Valdés, A., Vera, J., & Carlos, E. (2013). Variables que diferencian a estudiantes de bachillerato con y sin aptitudes intelectuales sobresalientes [Variables that differentiate baccalaureate students with and without outstanding intellectual aptitudes]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 15(3). Retrieved from http://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/562/841
  77. Wong, K. (2002). Catering for the needs of gifted and talented students by defining an appropiate curriculum. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal, 1, 166–171. Retrieved from https://www.edb.org.hk/hktc/download/journal/j1/2_1.2.pdf
  78. World Bank. (2017). Mexico School Based Management Project. Retrieved from http://projects.worldbank.org/P147185?lang=en
  79. Xu, J. (2018). Reciprocal effects on homework self-concept, interest, effort, and math achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 44–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yañez, A., & Valdés, A. (2012). Políticas públicas y modelos para la identificación y atención de estudiantes intelectualmente sobresalientes en México. In A. Valdés & J. Vera (Eds.), Estudiantes intelectualmente sobresalientes [Intellectually outstanding students] (pp. 141–156). Ciudad de México, México: Pearson.Google Scholar
  81. Yohary, A., & Araujo, C. (2014). Retos de la educación artística en el siglo XXI en México [Challenges in the artistic education in the XXI century in Mexico]. Universita Ciencia. Revista Electrónica de Investigación de la Universidad de Xalapa, 3(8), 59–69. Retrieved from https://ux.edu.mx/wp-content/uploads/Investiga/Revistas/Revista%2008/Revista%2008/06_Retos%20de%20la%20educ.%20art.pdf
  82. Zacatelco, F. (2005). Modelo para la identificación de niños sobresalientes en las escuelas de educación primaria [Model for the identification of outstanding children in primary schools]. Ciudad de México, México: Universidad Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  83. Zacatelco, F., & Acle, G. (2009). Validación de un modelo de identificación de la capacidad sobresalientes en estudiantes de primarias [Validation of an outstanding capacity identification model in elementary students]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Psicológica, 1(1), 41–53. Retrieved from http://www.revistamexicanadeinvestigacionenpsicologia.com/article/view/91/4
  84. Zavala, M. (2006). Modelos teóricos de la superdotación, el talento y las aptitudes sobresalientes. In M. Valadez, J. Betancourt, & M. Zavala (Eds.), Alumnos superdotados y Talentosos. Identificación, evaluación e intervención. Una perspectiva para docentes (Gifted and talented students. Identification, evaluation, and intervention. A perspective from teacher) (pp. 25–35). Ciudad de México, México: Manual Moderno.Google Scholar
  85. Zúñiga, M. (2013). Las vocaciones científicas y tecnológicas en los jóvenes con aptitudes sobresalientes y talentosos, la experiencia del Programa de Difusión y Divulgación de la Ciencia del Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Hidalgo [The scientific and technological vocations in young people with outstanding and talented skills, the experience of the Science Dissemination and Dissemination Program of the Council of Science and Technology of the State of Hidalgo]. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo (10), 1–24. Retrieved from http://ride.org.mx/1-11/index.php/RIDESECUNDARIO/article/viewFile/492/483

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Antonio Sánchez-Escobedo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Karen Camelo-Lavadores
    • 2
  • Angel Alberto Valdés-Cuervo
    • 3
  1. 1.College of EducationUniversidad Autónoma de YucatánMéridaMéxico
  2. 2.Universidad Autónoma de YucatánMéridaMéxico
  3. 3.Instituto Tecnológico de SonoraCiudad ObregónMéxico

Section editors and affiliations

  • Roger Moltzen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of WaikatoWaikatoNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations