Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters, Richard Heraud

Training Leaders for Democracies of the 21st Century, Case of the Academy of Political Innovation

  • Matías BianchiEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_45-1

Introduction

The world is experiencing profound transformations. The digital revolution, from the Internet 2.0 and the proliferation of mobile phones and social media to the current adoption of cyber-physical systems, the Internet of things, and artificial intelligence, is and will continue to impact the way humans live, work, and organize as societies (Schwab 2017). It has the potential to democratize our institutions, knowledge, and production, but, unfortunately, it also presents ethical and practical challenges.

These technologies can democratize institutions giving a voice to everyone, bringing the cost of participation down to zero, and delivering public goods in a transparent and efficient way (Rifkin 2014). But they can also be used to surveil political dissidents, to manipulate citizen’s private information, and to flood public discourse with fake information (Morozov 2014). Similarly, while circular models of production and consumption emerge, the current pattern is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Bianchi, Matías; Perini, Antonella; León, Cristian; Barlassina, María José; Liderazgos para el Siglo XXI: Una mirada a los programas de formación política en América Latina, Asuntos del Sur (retrieved online https://asuntosdelsur.org/liderazgos-para-el-siglo-xxi/)
  3. Boutmy, É., & Vinet, É. (1871). Projet d’une faculté libre des sciences politiques. Paris: Laine.Google Scholar
  4. Evans, P. (1989). Predatory, developmental and other apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the third world state. Sociological Forum, 4(4), 561–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harvard Kennedy School. History retrieved on January 2019. www.hks.harvard.edu/more/about-us/history
  6. London School of Economics Prospectus 1895. (1946). Economica, 13(49), 1–31.Google Scholar
  7. Morozov, E. (2014). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  8. Oliván, R. (Ed). La Revolución que nadie espera, en Abrir Instituciones Desde Dentro, Creative Commons, 2018. Retrieved: www.laaab.es/hackinginside
  9. Pascale, P. 2018. Los Laboratorios Ciudadanos Ante los Desafíos Comunitatios de las Ciudades Iberoamericanas, en Abrir Instituciones Desde Dentro, Creative Commons. Retrieved: www.laaab.es/hackinginside
  10. Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society; the internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  11. Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Currency, Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asuntos del SurBuenos AiresArgentina

Section editors and affiliations

  • Yanina Welp

There are no affiliations available