Advertisement

Technology Teacher Educators

The Role of Self-Study in Supporting Digital Age Technology Teacher Education
  • Candace FiggEmail author
  • Kamini Jaipal-Jamani
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Technology teacher educators – those teacher educators who teach courses in teacher education programs focused on the pedagogy of how to teach with technology – are a small community, with a teacher education program counting itself privileged if they have one technology teacher educator on faculty offering stand-alone technology pedagogy courses. However, technology teacher educators have knowledge that is essential for shaping the digital landscape and promoting technology-enhanced teaching in both preservice teachers and fellow teacher educators. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a description of how research, specifically self-study research, informs our current understanding of the problems of practice of technology teacher educators. As well, it is within the scope of this chapter to identify any gaps in self-study research that could contribute to our understanding of how technology teacher educators not only promote the knowledge about how to teach with technology but illuminate those problems of practice for technology teacher educators that are distinctly different from the examples in the self-study literature of how teacher educators build their own knowledge about how to teach with technology. Therefore, the chapter will present a review of the literature that describes best practices for building knowledge for teaching with technology appropriate for preservice teaching and illuminates the problems of practice experienced by technology teacher educators, with examples of teacher educators and their experiences. New directions for self-study research to support technology teacher educators so their stories are shared are also discussed.

Keywords

Technology teacher educators TPACK Technology integration Self-study Digital learning 

References

  1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bal, I. (2018, April). Why is it so hard to teach K-12 educators how to personalize learning? EdSurge. Available at: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2018-04-18-why-is-it-so-hard-to-teach-k-12-educators-how-to-personalize-learning.
  3. Baran, E., Uygun, E., Altan, T., Bahcekapili, T., & Cilsalar, H. (2014). Investigating technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Workshop design cases. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014 – World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 1536–1541). Tampere: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  4. Beaudin, L. (2016). Integrating structural gamification into pre-service teacher education. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 1132–1136). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  5. Bowers, J. S., & Stephens, B. (2011). Using technology to explore mathematical relationships: A framework for orienting mathematics courses for prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(4), 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brenner, A. M., & Brill, J. M. (2013). Nine substantiated practices in teacher education that promote technology integration in early career teachers: Applying empirical work to professional development. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2545–2549). New Orleans: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/48487/.Google Scholar
  7. Bruciati, A., & Lizano-DiMare, M. (2016). Informal technology coaching: Using pre-service teacher field experiences to support K-12 flipped classroom instruction. In Proceedings of E-learn: World conference on E-learning (pp. 1307–1312). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  8. Bull, G. L., & Bell, L. (2006). The 2006 National Technology Leadership Summit. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(3), 302–305. Waynesville: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/33140/.Google Scholar
  9. Bullock, S. M. (2013a). Learning to teach and the false apprenticeship: Emotion and identity development during the field experience placement. In M. Newberry, A. Gallant, & P. Riley (Eds.), Emotion and school: Understanding how the hidden curriculum influences relationships, leadership, teaching, and learning (pp. 119–140). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bullock, S. M. (2013b). Using digital technologies to support self-directed learning for preservice teacher education. The Curriculum Journal, 24(1), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bullock, S. M., & Sator, A. (2018). Developing a pedagogy of “making” through collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 14(1), 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter, J., Graziano, K., Borthwick, A., DeBacker, T., & Finsness, E. (2016). A diagnostic tool to help leaders develop TPACK ready teacher preparation programs. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2802–2805). Savannah: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172090/.Google Scholar
  13. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53, 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crowe, A. R. (2004). Teaching by example: Integrating technology into social studies education courses. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(4), 159–165.Google Scholar
  16. DeSantis, J. (2016). Investigating the relationship between TPACK and the ISTE standards for teachers. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 4(1), 16–30. University of Arizona Libraries. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/180275/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Blas, N., & Paolini, P. (2016). Distributed and Ddnamic TPACK: Evidences from a (large) case study. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2815–2821). Savannah: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172093/.Google Scholar
  18. Donnelly, R. (2006). Integrating learning technologies with experiential learning in a postgraduate teacher education course. Studying Teacher Education, 2(1), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dorner, H., & Kumar, S. (2017). Pre- and inservice teacher satisfaction with online collaborative mentoring for technology integration: Applying the Kano quality attributes. Online Learning Journal, 21(4). The Online Learning Consortium.Google Scholar
  20. Downes, T., & Figg, C. (2017). Addressing the use of Genius Hour in the teacher education program at Brock University. Paper presented at the 2017 Canadian Society for the Study of education. Toronto: Ryerson University.Google Scholar
  21. Dreon, O., & Shettel, J. (2016). The impact of authentic: How field experiences and authentic projects influence TPACK development. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2827–2833). Savannah: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  22. Elwood, K., & Savenye, W. (2015). Current tensions: A review of technology integration models utilized by pre-service teacher educator programs. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2295–2300). Las Vegas: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/150320/.Google Scholar
  23. Feldman, A., Paugh, P., & Mills, G. (2004). Self-study through action research. In International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 943–977). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Figg, C., & Jaipal, K. (2009, March). Unpacking TPACK: TPK characteristics supporting successful implementation. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4069–4073). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  25. Figg, C., & Jaipal, K. (2013). Using TPACK-in-practice workshops to enable teacher candidates to create professional development workshops that develop tech-enhanced teaching. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Society for Information Technology & teacher education international conference annual 2013 (pp. 5040–5047). Chesapeake: AACE.Google Scholar
  26. Figg, C., & Jaipal-Jamani, K. (2015a). Investigating the development of TPACK knowledge through gamification. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 3148–3156). Las Vegas: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/150440/.Google Scholar
  27. Figg, C., & Jaipal-Jamani, K. (2015b). Using gamification strategies to engage teacher candidates as they develop TPACK knowledge. In M. Niess & H. Willows-Giles (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education in the digital age (pp. 663–690). Hershey: IGI Global Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Figg, C., Rowsell, J., Welbourn, S., & Pelchat, K. (2018). Using informal learning of Makerspaces to enhance technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2037–2040). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182808/.Google Scholar
  29. Finger, G. & Finger, P. (2013). Understanding TPACK in practice: Praxis through technological pedagogical reasoning. Presented at international conference on educational technologies (ICEduTech) 2013.Google Scholar
  30. Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448. Waynesville: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/181966/.Google Scholar
  31. Fransson, G., & Holmberg, J. (2012). Understanding the theoretical framework of technological pedagogical content knowledge: A collaborative self-study to understand teaching practice and aspects of knowledge. Studying Teacher Education, 8(2), 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garbett, D., & Ovens, A. (Eds.). (2017). Being self-study researchers in a digital world. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Graham, C. R., Gorup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 530–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gur, H., & Karamete, A. (2015). A short review of TPACK for teacher education. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(7), 777–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2014). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (4th ed.). Raleigh: Pearson.Google Scholar
  37. Ham, V., & Davey, R. (2005). Is virtual teaching, real teaching? Learnings from two self-studies. In C. M. Kosnik, C. Beck, A. R. Freese, & A. P. Samaras (Eds.), Making a difference in teacher education through self-study (pp. 101–116). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harris, J. (1998). Design tools for the internet-supported classroom. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (AACE).Google Scholar
  40. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2009 (pp. 4087–4095). Chesapeake: AACE.Google Scholar
  41. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2016). Planning for deep learning using TPACK-based learning activity types. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2864–2871). Savannah: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  42. Harris, J., & Phillips, M. (2018). If There’s TPACK, is there technological pedagogical reasoning and action? In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2051–2061). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182811/.Google Scholar
  43. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010a). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 3833–3840). San Diego: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/33978/.Google Scholar
  45. Harris, J. B., Hofer, H. J., Schmidt, D. A., Blanchard, M. R., Young, C. Y., Grandgenett, N. F., & Van Olphen, M. (2010b). “Grounded” technology integration: Instructional planning using curriculum-based activity type taxonomies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4), 573–605.Google Scholar
  46. Harris, L., Yearta, L., & Chapman, H. (2018). The intersection of the UDL and TPACK frameworks: An investigation into teacher candidates’ use of technology during internship. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2175–2180). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182973/.Google Scholar
  47. Henderson, J. (2013). Linking critical pedagogy and educational technology. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1873–1876). New Orleans: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/48374/.Google Scholar
  48. Herring, M., Redmond, P., Thomas, T., Combs, B., Smaldino, S., & Williams, A. (2013). Leadership needs to develop TPACK ready teacher candidates. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 3599–3604). New Orleans: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/48663/.Google Scholar
  49. Herring, M. C., Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators. Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Hofer, M., & Harris, J. (2016). Open educational resources (OERs) for TPACK development. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2016 (pp. 2872–2877). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  51. Howell, S., & O’Donnell, B. (2017). Digital trends and initiatives in education. Toronto: Association of Canadian Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Jaipal, K., & Figg, C. (2010a). Expanding the practice-based taxonomy of characteristics of TPACK. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Society for Information Technology & teacher education 21st international conference (pp. 3868–3875). Chesapeake: Association for Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  53. Jaipal, K., & Figg, C. (2010b). Unpacking the “Total PACKage”: Emergent TPACK characteristics from a study of preservice teachers teaching with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 415–441. Chesapeake: AACE.Google Scholar
  54. Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Figg, C. (2015). The framework of TPACK-in-practice: Designing content-centric technology professional learning contexts to develop teacher knowledge of technology-enhanced teaching. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.), Technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring, developing and assessing TPCK (pp. 137–163). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Jaipal-Jamani, K., Figg, C., Collier, D., Gallagher, T., Winters, K. L., & Ciampa, K. (2015a). Transitioning into the role of technology leaders: Building faculty capacity for technology-enhanced teaching. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015 society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 3264–3271). Las Vegas: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  56. Jaipal-Jamani, K., Figg, C., Gallagher, T., Scott, R. M., & Ciampa, K. (2015b). Collaborative professional development in higher education: Developing knowledge of technology enhanced teaching. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(2), 30–44.Google Scholar
  57. Jin, Y., Jenner, A., Karakaya, O., Kramer, E., & Schmidt-Crawford, D. (2015). Dive into content areas: Instructional review and redesign of a blended technology integration course for PK-6 pre-service teachers. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 3276–3281). Las Vegas: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  58. Johnson, L. (2014). Impact of design teams on preservice teachers’ TPACK, attitudes, & skills. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2544–2551). Jacksonville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  59. Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan. Retrieved from http://www.aect.org/edtech/ed1/.Google Scholar
  60. Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2004). Models of teaching (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  61. Kay, R. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005a). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–101.Google Scholar
  63. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005b). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.Google Scholar
  64. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kosnik, C., Menna, L., & Bullock, S. M. (2017). Changing our practice and identity go hand-in-hand: A self-study of our efforts to infuse digital technology into our literacy courses. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Being self-study researchers in a digital world (pp. 47–60). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. John Loughran et al. (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lassonde, C. A., Galman, S., & Kosnik, C. (2009). Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the world wide web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lee, K., Suharwoto, G., Niess, M., & Sadri, P. (2006). Guiding inservice mathematics teachers in developing TPCK (technology pedagogical content knowledge). In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2006 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 3750–3765). Orlando: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22684/.Google Scholar
  72. Lindsey, L., Buss, R., Foulger, T., Wetzel, K., & Pasquel, S. (2016). The technology infusion iTeach experience: Preparing student teachers to integrate technology. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2923–2930). Savannah: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  73. Lloyd, M. (2013). Something’s coming, something good: Identifying TPACK competence in pre-service teachers’ analyses of learning objects. Australian Educational Computing, 28(1), 71–82.Google Scholar
  74. Marich, H., & Greenhow, C. (2016). Technology integration and teacher stages of concern categorized by TPACK knowledge types. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2941–2948). Savannah: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172113/.Google Scholar
  75. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, March 24–28. (Conference Presentation).Google Scholar
  77. Mishra, P., & The Deep-Play Research Group. (2018). Crayons are the future. In P. Mishra & D. Henriksen (Eds.), Creativity, technology & education: Exploring their convergence (pp. 9–16). Cham: Springer Briefs in Educational Communications and Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., Wolf, L. G., & DeSchryver, M. (2010). Developing TPACK by design. In J. Voogt (Ed.), Developing TPACK. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE). San Diego.Google Scholar
  79. Mourlam, D., & Bleecker, H. (2017). Early career teacher candidate TPACK development: Implementation of a learning activity types short course. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2404–2409). Austin: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  80. Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mouza, C., Nandakumar, R., Yilmaz Ozden, S., & Karchmer-Klein, R. (2017a). A longitudinal examination of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge in the context of undergraduate teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 39(2), 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mouza, C., Yang, H., Pan, Y.-C., Yilmaz Ozden, S., & Pollock, L. (2017b). Resetting educational technology coursework for pre-service teachers: A computational thinking approach to the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Niess, M. L. (2012). Rethinking pre-service mathematics teachers’ preparation: Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). In D. Polly, C. Mims, & K. Persichitte (Eds.), Developing technology-rich, teacher education programs: Key issues (pp. 316–336). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Paige, R., Hickok, E., & Patrik, S. (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  87. Parsons, A. W., & Hjalmarson, M. A. (2017). Study of self: The self as designer in online teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 13(3), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.
  89. Perkmen, S., Antonenko, P., & Caracuel, A. (2016). Validating a measure of teacher intentions to integrate technology in education in Turkey, Spain and the USA. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(2), 215–241.Google Scholar
  90. Phillips, M., Koehler, M., Rosenberg, J., & Zunica, B. (2017). Unpacking TPACK: Reconsidering knowledge and context in teacher practice. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2422–2429). Austin: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/177538/.Google Scholar
  91. Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C. E., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 863–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Richardson, K. W. (2010). TPACK game on. Learning & Leading with Technology, 37(8), 34–35.Google Scholar
  93. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  94. Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16–21.Google Scholar
  96. Sanagavarapu, P. (2018). From pedagogue to Technogogue: A journey into flipped classrooms in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(3), 377–399. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173324/.Google Scholar
  97. Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Koehler, M., Punya, M., & Shin, T. (2009a). Examining preservice teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge in an introductory instructional technology course. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009 Society for Information Technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 4145–4151). Charleston: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/31308/.Google Scholar
  98. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009b). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schrum, L. (2005). A proactive approach to a research agenda for educational technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Shulman, L. (2000). Inventing the future. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 95–105). Menlo Park: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  103. Stansberry, S. (2015). Transformative practice in teaching with technology for preservice teachers. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015 – Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2596–2604). Las Vegas: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  104. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Trevisan, O., & De Rossi, M. (2018). TPCK and Initial teacher education: Insights on the development of pedagogical reasoning in TPCK-based instructional design (ID) practices. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2128–2132). Washington, DC: United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  106. Turner, S. A. (2011). A self-study of technological transition: Instructional impacts of shifting a distance course delivery system. Journal of Educators Online, 8(2), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. White, B., & Geer, R. (2013). Preservice teachers experience with online modules about TPACK. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 124–132.Google Scholar
  109. Willermark, S. (2018). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A review of empirical studies published from 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wu, Y. T. (2013). Research trends in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) research: A review of empirical studies published in selected journals from 2002 to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), E73–E76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Alicia R Crowe
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Education, Health and Human ServicesKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations