A Threefold Approach for Enabling Social Change: Communication as Context for Interaction, Uneven Development, and Recognition

  • Gloria Gómez DiagoEmail author
Living reference work entry


In a context where research aimed to intervene on an increasingly unequal society is very necessary, we are bringing a theoretical framework intended to enable social change. The frame presented here is conceived for assessing environments communicatively, and it is articulated through a proposed paradigm (communication as a context for interaction) and two concepts: uneven development and recognition.


Epistemology Communication research Methodology Recognition Social change Uneven development 


  1. Beniger JR (1993) Communication – embrace the subject, not the Field. J Commun 43:18–25. Scholar
  2. Berelson B, Lazarsfeld PF (1948) The analysis of communication content. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Bieler A, Morton D (2014) Uneven development, unequal exchange and free trade: what implications for labour?. Retrieved from
  4. Cáceres MD, Caffarel C (1992) La Investigación sobre Comunicación en España. Un Balance Cualitativo. Telos 32:109–124. Retrieved from Scholar
  5. Caffarel Serra C, Mohedano O, Moya G (2017) Investigación en comunicación en la universidad española en el período 2007–2014. El profesional de la información 26(2). Retrieved from
  6. Curry Jansen S (1983) Power and knowledge: toward a new critical synthesis. J Commun. Ferment in the Field 33(3):342–354. Scholar
  7. Davis DK, Jasinski J (1993) Beyond the culture wars: an agenda for research on communication and culture. J Commun 43(3):141–149. The Future of the Field Between Fragmentation and CohesionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erdogan I (2012) Missing Marx: the place of Marx in current communication research and the place of communication in Marx’s work. Triple C Cogn Commun Co-oper 10(2):349–391. Scholar
  9. Folch-Serra M (1990) Place, voice, space: Mikhail Bakhtin’s dialogical landscape. Environ Plaining Soc Space 8:255–254. Scholar
  10. Foucault B, Vashevko A, Bennet N, Contractor N (2014) Dynamic models of communication in an online friendship network. Commun Methods Meas 8(4):223–243. Retrieved from Scholar
  11. Friedland LA (2001) Communication, community, and democracy. Commun Res 28(4):358–391. Retrieved from Scholar
  12. Fuchs C (2016) Critical theory of communication. University of Westminster Press, London. License: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. Retrieved from Scholar
  13. Gómez Diago G (2015) Communication in crowdfunding online platforms. In: Zagalo N, Branco P (eds) Creative technologies: create and engage using art and play. Springer, London. Retrieved from Scholar
  14. Gómez Diago G (2016a) The role of shared emotions in the construction of the Cyberculture. From cultural industries to cultural actions. The case of crowdfunding. In: Tettegah S (ed) Emotions, technology and social media. Elsevier, London/San Diego/Cambridge/Oxford, pp 49–62. Retrieved from Scholar
  15. Gómez Diago G (2016b) Dissertation: for communication research. 400 ideas from the last three decades and a proposal to update the interaction paradigm. Dissertation defended on 22 Jan 2016. Awarded with the extraordinary award of doctorate (Sept 2014–Sept 2016) Rey Juan Carlos University. Supervisor: Professor Dr. Manuel Martínez-Nicolás. Abstract. Retrieved from
  16. Gómez Diago G (2017) The role of research in communication before citizen participation. Proposal to investigate understanding communication as a context for interaction. In: Herrero J, Mateos C (eds) From the verb to the bit, Cuadernos Artesanos de Comunicación, 2nd edn, pp 1879–1899. Retrieved from Scholar
  17. Grandi R (1983) The limitations of the sociological approach: alternatives from Italian communications research. J Commun 33(3):53–58. Fement in the FieldCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris (2007) Uneven Development, The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Honneth A (1995) The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflicts (Transl.: By Joel Anderson). The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Koschmann M (2010) Communication as a distinct mode of explanation makes a difference. Commun Monogr 77(4):431–434. Scholar
  21. Krippendorff K (1993) The past of Communication’s hoped-for future. J Commun 43(3):34–44.
  22. Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. In: International encyclopedia of unified science, vol 2(2). University of Chicago, Chicago, pp 1–210.
  23. Lasswell HD (1948) The analysis of political behaviour, an empirical approach. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Martínez-Nicolás M, Saperas E (2011) Communication research in Spain, 1998–2007. An analysis of articles published in Spanish communication journals, en Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 66: 101–129. Retrieved from
  25. Martínez-Nicolás M, Saperas E (2016) Research focus and methodological features in the recent Spanish communication studies (2008–2014). Rev Lat Comun Soc 71:1365–1384. Retrieved from Scholar
  26. Mattelart A (1983) Technology, culture, and communication: research and policy priorities in France. J Commun 33(3):59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McQuail D (2013) Communication research paradigms reflections on paradigm change in communication theory and research. Int J Commun 7:216–229. Scholar
  28. Melody WH, Mansell RE (1983) The debate over critical vs administrative research: circularity or challenge. J Commun 33:103–116. Scholar
  29. Meyrowitz J (1985) No sense of place. Amazon Kindle edn 2010. Oxford University Press, New York/OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyrowitz J (2009) Medium theory. An alternative to the dominant paradigm of media effects. In: Nabin R, Oliver MB (eds) The Sage handbook of media processes and effects. Scholar
  31. Monahan JL, Collins-Jarvis L (1993) The hierarchy of institutional values in the communication discipline. J Commun 43(3):150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morris N (2005) The diffusion and participatory models: a comparative analysis. In: Hermer O, Tufte T (eds) Media & glocal change rethinking communication for development. Publicaciones Cooperativas, Buenos Aires. CLACSO. Retrieved efrom Scholar
  33. Mosco V (1983) Critical research and the role of labour. J Commun Fement Field 33(3):237–348. Scholar
  34. Mosco V (2018) Social media versus journalism and democracy. Journalism 20(1):181–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ninam Thomas P (2015) Communication for social change, making theory count. Nordicom Rev 36(Special Issue):71–78. Available in:
  36. Papadimitropoulos V (2017) The politics of the commons: reform or revolt? tripleC 15(2):563–581. Retrieved from Scholar
  37. Rist G (2010) Development as a buzzword (19–28). In: Cornwall A, Eade D (eds) Deconstructing development discourse. Buzzwords and Fuzzwords. Practical Action Publishing in association with Oxfam GB, Bourton on Dunsmore, Rugby, Warwickshire. Retrieved from Scholar
  38. Rogers EM (1976) Communication and development. The passing of the dominant paradigm. Commun Res 3(2)Google Scholar
  39. Rogers EM, Chaffee S (1983) Communication as an academic discipline: a dialogue. J Commun 33:18–30. Scholar
  40. Rogers EM, Kincaid DL (1981) Communication networks: toward a new paradigm for research. Free Press, New York, p 386Google Scholar
  41. Rothenbuhler EW (1993) Argument for a Durkheimian theory of the communicative. J Commun 43(3):158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sassen S (2012) When the center no longer holds: cities as frontier zones. J Cities.
  43. Schiller HI (1983) Critical research in the information age. J Commun 33(3):249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schulz W (2004) Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. Eur J Commun 19(1):87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shepherd GJ (1989) Building a discipline of communication. J Commun 43(3):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stevenson ARL (1983) A critical look at critical analysis. J Commun Ferment Field 33(3):262–269. Scholar
  47. Tehranian M (1991) Communication and theories of social change: a communitarian perspective. Asian J Commun 2(1):1–30. Scholar
  48. Tunstall J (1983) The trouble with U.S. communication research. J Commun,. Ferment in the Field 33(3):92–95. Scholar
  49. Van der Linden M (2007) The ‘law’ of uneven and combined development: some underdeveloped thoughts. Hist Mater 15:145–165. Retrieved from Scholar
  50. Vásquez C, Cooren F (2013) Spacing practices: the communicative configuration of organizing through space-times. Commun Theory 23:25–47. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication Sciences and SociologyRey Juan Carlos UniversityFuenlabrada, MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations