Encyclopedia of Ocean Engineering

Living Edition
| Editors: Weicheng Cui, Shixiao Fu, Zhiqiang Hu

Marine Operations

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6963-5_194-1
  • 4 Downloads

Definitions

Marine operations are nonroutine operation of a limited defined duration related to handling of object(s) and/or vessel(s) in the marine environment during temporary phases (DNVGL 2017). A marine operation is a process involving interactions between dynamic systems, operational procedures, environmental actions, and human intervention. A marine operation shall be designed to bring an object from one defined safe condition to another.

Examples of Marine Operations

Marine operations include a large variety of activities. The definitions of the following commonly used operations are provided (DNVGL 2016).
  • Towing: The transfer at sea from one location to another location of a self-floating structure or a structure resting on a barge by pushing/pulling by tugs.

  • Launching:The activities comprising cutting of sea fastening of a structure resting on a launch barge, the structure’s slide-down on the launch rails on the barge and diving into the water until the structure is free...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ahn D, Shin S-c, Kim S-y, Kharoufi H, Kim H-c (2017) Comparative evaluation of different offshore wind turbine installation vessels for korean west–south wind farm. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 9(1):45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballast Nedam (2011) Supporting offshore wind – alternative foundation installation. Technical report, Ballast Nedam Offshore B.V. Available from http://flow-offshore.nl/images/flow-openbaar/alternative-foundation-installation.pdf
  3. Bense MP (2014). Comparison of numerical simulation and model test for integrated installation of GBS wind turbine. Master’s thesis, Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  4. DNVGL (2016) Standard DNVGL-ST-N001, Marine operations and marine warranty. DNV GL AS, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  5. DNVGL (2017) Recommended practice DNVGL-RP-N101, Risk management in marine and subsea operations. DNV GL AS, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  6. Equinor (2018). Hywind installation. Available at https://www.equinor.com/en/how-and-why/innovate/the-hywind-challenge.html. Accessed 7 May 2018
  7. Gao Z, Wilson Guachamin Acero LL, Zhao Y, Li C, Moan T (2016) Numerical simulation of marine operations and prediction of operability using response-based criteria with an application to installation of offshore wind turbine support structures. In Marine operations specialty symposium (MOSS 2016)Google Scholar
  8. Guachamin-Acero W (2016) Assessment of marine operations for offshore wind turbine installation with emphasis on response-based operational limits. PhD thesis, Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  9. Guachamin-Acero W, Li L (2018) Methodology for assessment of operational limits including uncertainties in wave spectral energy distribution for safe execution of marine operations. Ocean Eng 165:184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guachamin-Acero W, Moan T, Gao Z (2016a) Assessment of the dynamic responses and allowable sea states for a novel offshore wind turbine installation concept based on the inverted pendulum principle. Energy Procedia 94:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guachamin-Acero W, Li L, Gao Z, Moan T (2016b) Methodology for assessment of the operational limits and operability of marine operations. Ocean Eng 125:308–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guachamin-Acero W, Gao Z, Moan T (2017) Methodology for assessment of the allowable sea states during installation of an offshore wind turbine transition piece structure onto a monopile foundation. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 139(6):061901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herman SA (2002) Offshore wind farms – analysis of transport and installation costs, report no. ECN-I-02-002. Technical report, Energy research centre of the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang Z, Gao Z, Ren Z, Li Y, Duan L (2018a) A parametric study on the final blade installation process for monopile wind turbines under rough environmental conditions. Eng Struct 172:1042–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiang Z, Li L, Gao Z, Halse KH, Sandvik PC (2018b) Dynamic response analysis of a catamaran installation vessel during the positioning of a wind turbine assembly onto a spar foundation. Mar Struct 61:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang Z, Ren Z, Gao Z, Sandvik PC, Halse KH, Skjetne R, et al (2018c) Mating control of a wind turbine tower-nacelle-rotor assembly for a catamaran installation vessel. In The 28th international ocean and polar engineering conference, international society of offshore and polar engineers, Sapporo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonkman J, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G (2009) Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. Technical report, NREL/TP-500-38060, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)Google Scholar
  18. Kaiser MJ, Snyder B (2011) Offshore wind energy installation and decommisioning cost estimation in the US outer continental shelf. Technical report, US department of the interior, bureau of ocean energy management, regulation and enforcement, Herndon, TA & R study 648, 340 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Ku N, Roh M-I (2014) Dynamic response simulation of an offshore wind turbine suspended by a floating crane. Ships Offshore Struct 10(6):1–14Google Scholar
  20. Kuijken L (2015) Single blade installation for large wind turbines in extreme wind conditions. Master’s thesis, Master of science thesis, Technical University of Denmark & TU DelftGoogle Scholar
  21. Li L (2016) Dynamic analysis of the installation of monopiles for offshore wind turbines. PhD thesis, Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 1–70Google Scholar
  22. Li L, Gao Z, Moan T, Ormberg H (2014) Analysis of lifting operation of a monopile for an offshore wind turbine considering vessel shielding effects. Mar Struct 39:287–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li L, Gao Z, Moan T (2015) Response analysis of a nonstationary lowering operation for an offshore wind turbine monopile substructure. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 137(5)Google Scholar
  24. Li L, Acero WG, Gao Z, Moan T (2016a) Assessment of allowable sea states during installation of offshore wind turbine monopiles with shallow penetration in the seabed. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 138(4):041902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li L, Gao Z, Moan T (2016b) Operability analysis of monopile lowering operation using different numerical approaches. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 26:88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lien KH (2016) Hywind scotland – marine operations. In Science meets industry Stavanger, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  27. LORC (2013) The jacket – a path to deeper waters. Available at http://www.lorc.dk/offshore-wind/foundations/jackets. Accessed 11 May 2017
  28. Npower Renewable (2006) Capital grant scheme for the North Hoyle offshore wind farm annual report: July 2005-june 2006. Technical report, Npower Renewables Limited, EssenGoogle Scholar
  29. Østvik I (2010) Lessons learned from the first German offshore wind farm –Alpha Ventus. Presented in SPE conference, 14 Apr, BergenGoogle Scholar
  30. Peire K, Nonneman H, Bosschem E (2009) Gravity base foundations for the Thornton bank offshore wind farm. Terra et Aqua 115:19–29Google Scholar
  31. Ren Z, Jiang Z, Gao Z, Skjetne R (2018a) Active tugger line force control for single blade installation. Wind Energy 21:1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ren Z, Jiang Z, Skjetne R, Gao Z, et al (2018b) Single blade installation using active control of three tugger lines. In The 28th international ocean and polar engineering conference, international society of offshore and polar engineersGoogle Scholar
  33. Roddier D, Cermelli C, Aubault A, Weinstein A (2010) Windfloat: a floating foundation for offshore wind turbines. J Renewable Sustainable Energy 2(3):033104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sarkar A, Gudmestad OT (2013) Study on a new method for installing a monopile and a fully integrated offshore wind turbine structure. Mar Struct 33:160–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wasjø K, Bermúdez J, Bjerkas M, Søreide T (2013) A novel concept for self installing offshore wind turbines. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Nantes, 9–14 June 2013Google Scholar
  36. Zhao Y, Cheng Z, Sandvik PC, Gao Z, Moan T (2018a) An integrated dynamic analysis method for simulating installation of single blades for wind turbines. Ocean Eng 152:72–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao Y, Cheng Z, Sandvik PC, Gao Z, Moan T, Van Buren E (2018b) Numerical modeling and analysis of the dynamic motion response of an offshore wind turbine blade during installation by a jack-up crane vessel. Ocean Eng 165:353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials ScienceUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway

Section editors and affiliations

  • Zhen Gao
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway