Advertisement

Water and Land Effects on Agricultural Development for River Basin: Resource Restriction and Sustainable Development

  • Guofeng Wang
  • Jiancheng Chen
  • Fuchun Zhang
  • Xiaoxue Zhou
  • Xiangzheng Deng
Reference work entry
Part of the Ecohydrology book series (ECOH)

Abstract

Water and land resources play vital roles in agricultural growth. They not only remarkably support overall economic growth but may also restrict agricultural development. To document the influence of water and land on agriculture, we examined the “drag effects” of these two resources in limiting agricultural production. In this study, data from eight counties collected during 2000–2012 from the Heihe Agricultural Production Area in Gansu Province were used to analyze the drag effects of water and land resources on agricultural growth. These effects varied largely among the eight counties, which were consistent with the availability of these resources. Also we used a three-stage data envelopment analysis for examining agricultural water use efficiency (WUE) and related issues in Heihe River Basin from 2004 to 2012. This method adjusts technology efficiency (TE), pure technology efficiency (PTE), and scale efficiency (SE). Results show that WUE-related efficiency varies according to scale. TE and SE decreased in the study area, while PTE increased. This means the effects of pure technology on improving overall technology are very limited, and scale adjustment is vitally important to the agricultural production area in the Heihe River Basin. The results provide recommendations for decision-makers to plan efficient use of water resources in arid and semiarid areas. This study will give scientific support to coordinating development with the availability of water and land resources in agricultural areas of China.

Keywords

Water and land resources Agricultural growth Restriction Drag effect Three-stage data envelopment analysis 

References

  1. M.H. Abd El-Wahed, E.A. Ali, Effect of irrigation systems, amounts of irrigation water and mulching on corn yield, water use efficiency and net profit. Agric. Water Manag. 120, 64–71 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.017Google Scholar
  2. Apergis and Ozturk, Testing environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators. 52, 16–22 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. S. Álvarez, J. Sánchez-Blanco, Scientia Horticulturae changes in growth rate, root morphology and water use efficiency of potted Callistemon Citrinus plants in response to different levels of water deficit. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 156, 54–62 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.03.024Google Scholar
  4. Barbier, Climate change impacts on rural poverty in low-elevation coastal zones. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 165, A1-A13 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. B.E. Bravo-Ureta, D. Solıs, V.H. Moreira López, J.F. Maripani, A. Thiam, T. Rivas, Technical efficiency in farming: a meta-regression analysis. J. Product. Anal. 27, 57–72 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-006-0025-3Google Scholar
  6. R. Chen, W. Cheng, J. Cui, J. Liao, H. Fan, Z. Zheng, F. Ma, Lateral spacing in drip-irrigated wheat: the effects on soil moisture, yield, and water use efficiency. F. Crop. Res. 179, 52–62 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.021Google Scholar
  7. X. Deng, J. Huang, S. Rozelle, E. Uchida, Economic growth and the expansion of urban land in China. Urban Stud. (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009349770
  8. Diswandi, A hybrid coasean and pigouvian approach to payment for ecosystem services program in West Lombok: Does it contribute to poverty alleviation? Ecosystem Services. 23, 138–145 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. T.s. Du, S.z. Kang, B.y. Yan, J.h. Zhang, Alternate furrow irrigation: a practical way to improve grape quality and water use efficiency in arid Northwest China. J. Integr. Agric. 12, 509–519 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60252-XGoogle Scholar
  10. T.A.A. El-Mageed, W.M. Semida, Effect of deficit irrigation and growing seasons on plant water status, fruit yield and water use efficiency of squash under saline soil. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 186, 89–100 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.013Google Scholar
  11. S. Emran, F. Shilpi, Agricultural productivity, hired labor, wages, and poverty: Evidence from Bangladesh. World Development (2017)Google Scholar
  12. Fisher et al., Strengthening conceptual foundations: Analysing frameworks for ecosystem services and poverty alleviation research. Global Environmental Change. 23, 1098–1111 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. J.A. Fisher, G. Patenaude, K. Giri, K. Lewis, P. Meir, P. Pinho, M.D.A. Rounsevell, M. Williams, Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Ecosyst. Serv. 7, 34–45 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.002Google Scholar
  14. Friend and Moench, What is the purpose of urban climate resilience? Implications for addressing poverty and vulnerability. Urban Climate. 6, 98–113 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. Y. Gadanakis, R. Bennett, J. Park, F.J. Areal, Improving productivity and water use efficiency: a case study of farms in England. Agric. Water Manag. 160, 22–32 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.020Google Scholar
  16. Glomsrod et al., A warmer policy for a colder climate: Can China both reduce poverty and cap carbon emissions? Sci Total Environ. 568, 236–244 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. X. Guoju, Z. Fengju, Q. Zhengji, Y. Yubi, W. Runyuan, H. Juying, Response to climate change for potato water use efficiency in semi-arid areas of China. Agric. Water Manag. 127, 119–123 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.06.004Google Scholar
  18. I. Haddeland, J. Heinke, H. Biemans, S. Eisner, M. Flörke, N. Hanasaki, M. Konzmann, F. Ludwig, Y. Masaki, J. Schewe, T. Stacke, Z.D. Tessler, Y. Wada, D. Wisser, Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 3251–3256 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222475110Google Scholar
  19. Hanjra et al., Pathways to breaking the poverty trap in Ethiopia: Investments in agricultural water, education, and markets. Agricultural Water Management. 96, 1596–1604 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. Hannum et al., Poverty, Food insecurity and nutritional deprivation in rural China: Implications for Children’s literacy achievement. Int J Educ Dev. 34, 90–97 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. Hertel and Lobell, Agricultural adaptation to climate change in rich and poor countries: Current modeling practice and potential for empirical contributions. Energy Economics. 46, 562–575 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. Kenter et al., What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecological Economics. 111, 86–99 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. Z. Li, X. Deng, F. Wu, S. Hasan, Scenario analysis for water resources in response to land use change in the middle and upper reaches of the Heihe river basin. Sustainability 7, 3086–3108 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su7033086Google Scholar
  24. Liu and Deng, Impacts and mitigation of climate change on Chinese cities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 3, 188–192 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. Y. Nian, X. Li, J. Zhou, X. Hu, Impact of land use change on water resource allocation in the middle reaches of the Heihe river basin in northwestern China. J. Arid. Land 6, 273–286 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0209-4Google Scholar
  26. Njuguna and McSharry, Constructing spatiotemporal poverty indices from big data. Journal of Business Research. 70, 318–327 (2017)Google Scholar
  27. F.C. Olivier, A. Singels, Increasing water use efficiency of irrigated sugarcane production in South Africa through better agronomic practices. F. Crop. Res. 176, 87–98 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.02.010Google Scholar
  28. S. Piao, P. Ciais, Y. Huang, Z. Shen, S. Peng, J. Li, L. Zhou, H. Liu, Y. Ma, Y. Ding, P. Friedlingstein, C. Liu, K. Tan, Y. Yu, T. Zhang, J. Fang, The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 467, 43–51 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09364Google Scholar
  29. P.F. Pinho et al., Ecosystem protection and poverty alleviation in the tropics: perspective from a historical evolution of policy-making in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecosyst. Serv. 8, 97–109 (2014)Google Scholar
  30. H. Sandhu, S. Sandhu, Linking ecosystem services with the constituents of human well-being for poverty alleviation in eastern Himalayas. Ecol. Econ. 107, 65–75 (2014)Google Scholar
  31. G. Sangüesa-Barreda, J.C. Linares, J. Julio Camarero, Drought and mistletoe reduce growth and water-use efficiency of Scots pine. For. Ecol. Manag. 296, 64–73 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.028Google Scholar
  32. H. Suich et al., Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a review of the empirical links. Ecosyst. Serv. 12, 137–147 (2015)Google Scholar
  33. L. Susskind, Water and democracy: new roles for civil society in water governance. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 29, 666–677 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2013.781914Google Scholar
  34. J.A. Tolk, S.R. Evett, W. Xu, R.C. Schwartz, Constraints on water use efficiency of drought tolerant maize grown in a semi-arid environment. F. Crop. Res. 186, 66–77 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.11.012Google Scholar
  35. J.K. Turpie et al., The working for water programme: evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecol. Econ. 65, 788–798 (2008)Google Scholar
  36. S.Z. Walelign et al., Environmental income improves household-level poverty assessments and dynamics. Forest Policy Econ. 71, 23–35 (2016)Google Scholar
  37. G. Wan, Y. Zhang, Chronic and transient poverty in rural China. Econ. Lett. 119, 284–286 (2013)Google Scholar
  38. Z. Wang, X. Deng, Y. Bai, J. Chen, W. Zheng, Land use structure and emission intensity at regional scale: a case study at the middle reach of the Heihe River basin. Appl. Energy 183, 1581–1593 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.109Google Scholar
  39. G. Wang, N. Lin, X. Zhou, Z. Li, X. Deng, Three-stage data envelopment analysis of agricultural water use efficiency: A case study of the Heihe River Basin. Sustainability, 10(2), 568 (2018)Google Scholar
  40. P. Wang et al., Payments for ecosystem services and wealth distribution. Ecol. Econ. 132, 63–68 (2017)Google Scholar
  41. P.S. Ward, Transient poverty, poverty dynamics, and vulnerability to poverty: an empirical analysis using a balanced panel from rural China. World Dev. 78, 541–553 (2016)Google Scholar
  42. Z. Wei, T. Du, J. Zhang, S. Xu, P.J. Cambre, W.J. Davies, Carbon isotope discrimination shows a higher water use efficiency under alternate partial root-zone irrigation of field-grown tomato. Agric. Water Manag. 165, 33–43 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.11.009Google Scholar
  43. T. Wossen, T. Berger, Climate variability, food security and poverty: agent-based assessment of policy options for farm households in Northern Ghana. Environ. Sci. Pol. 47, 95–107 (2015)Google Scholar
  44. Y. Wu, Z. Jia, X. Ren, Y. Zhang, X. Chen, H. Bing, P. Zhang, Effects of ridge and furrow rainwater harvesting system combined with irrigation on improving water use efficiency of maize (Zea mays L.) in semi-humid area of China. Agric. Water Manag. 158, 1–9 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.021Google Scholar
  45. L. Xin, Y. Qing-wei, Z. Lu, L. Hui-min, Z. Hai-xia, B. Wen-long, C. Ya-jun, Research progress on water use efficiency and drought resistance of turfgrass. J. Northeast. Agric. Univ. 20, 85–90 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-8104(13)60014-8Google Scholar
  46. G.J. Yang et al., Interplay between environment, agriculture and infectious diseases of poverty: case studies in China. Acta Trop. 141, 399–406 (2015)Google Scholar
  47. L. Zanin, G. Marra, Assessing the functional relationship between CO2 emissions and economic development using an additive mixed model approach. Econ. Model. 29, 1328–1337 (2012)Google Scholar
  48. J.Y. Zhang, L.C. Wang, Assessment of water resource security in Chongqing City of China: what has been done and what remains to be done? Nat. Hazards 75, 2751–2772 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1460-5Google Scholar
  49. K. Zhang et al., Poverty alleviation strategies in eastern China lead to critical ecological dynamics. Sci. Total Environ. 506–507, 164–181 (2015)Google Scholar
  50. X. Zhao, J. Liu, Q. Liu, M.R. Tillotson, D. Guan, K. Hubacek, Physical and virtual water transfers for regional water stress alleviation in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 1031–1035 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404130112Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guofeng Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiancheng Chen
    • 2
  • Fuchun Zhang
    • 1
  • Xiaoxue Zhou
    • 2
  • Xiangzheng Deng
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of International TradeShanxi University of Finance and EconomicsTaiyuanChina
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Center for Chinese Agricultural PolicyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations