Encyclopedia of Ionic Liquids

Living Edition
| Editors: Suojiang Zhang

Biodegradability of Ionic Liquids (ILs) Under Aerobic and Anaerobic Conditions

  • Marta MarkiewiczEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6739-6_56-1
  • 6 Downloads

Introduction

Persistence, bioaccumulation potential, and toxicity are the main parameters considered in environmental hazard assessment. Out of these persistence is the key factor. Rapidly degrading chemicals are unlikely to cause adverse effects, and even if they do, there is a high probability that these effects can be reversed. Persistent chemicals on the other hand will continue to accumulate in the environment for as long as they will be released, and the damage that they might cause can be difficult, if not impossible, to reverse. Therefore, persistence should be avoided by all means.

Testing Biodegradability

Biodegradability can be tested in several different ways which differ in test conditions, system complexity, environmental relevance, measurement method, and the kind of information they deliver (extensive information can be obtained from [5, 24, 45]). Based on the parameter that is measured, the biodegradability can be evaluated as:
  • Primary degradation – evaluates the transformation of the parent compound to any other product that is structurally different from it. It usually requires measuring the concentration of the parent compound at several time points using specific analytical method. If no attampt is made to search for transformation products the extent of degradation cannot be judged, i.e., it might be limited to a first transformation step (which could lead to a stable product) or lead to complete degradation (mineralization), yet the outcome of the test might still be 100% primary degradation in both cases.

  • Ultimate biodegradation (mineralization) – evaluates the transformation of parent compound to simple inorganic compounds (e.g., CO2, H2O, NH3, NOx) using a non-specific sum parameter, e.g., CO2 evolution, O2 consumption, and elimination of dissolved organic carbon.

The test systems used to measure biodegradability (at least the standardized ones) can also vary with respect to how realistically do they represent environmental conditions and which environment are they representing. The outcome of these tests is often accompanied by a threshold value that can be used to classify the compounds in terms of biodegradation potential often in regulatory context. Generally, in environmental regulatory context, a tiered approach is often adopted with the test systems increasing in relevance and complexity:
  • Ready biodegradability tests (e.g., according to OECD 301 A–F guideline) – is a screening test (I tier) based on ultimate biodegradability assessment and is the most often employed test in ionic liquid literature. The test conditions are stringent with low inoculum densities, no adaptation, and no nutrient supplementation. Compounds passing an arbitrary threshold value of 60% CO2 evolution/O2 consumption or 70% dissolved organic carbon removal are classified as readily biodegradable. These compounds are then deemed to degrade easily in the environment.

  • Inherent degradability tests (e.g., according to OECD 302 A–C guideline) is a second-tier test based on primary or ultimate degradability assessment. The test conditions are much more conducive compared to ready biodegradability test due to high inoculum density as well as active aeration, nutrient addition, and inoculum adaptation in some of the procedures.

Biodegradability of ILs’ Cations by Classes

ILs are composed of a minimum two entities, the cation and the anion, and they should be both taken into account in evaluating persistence. It was often shown that only one of the entities is biologically degradable, sometimes to high extent, e.g., exceeding ready biodegradability threshold values, while the other entity persists [5, 24, 45, 50]. Such an ILs cannot be truly green. Therefore, in green design of ILs, one should strive to make the entire IL degradable.

Certain features of ILs’ structure make it more susceptible to biodegradation and should be promoted if the green design is the aim (see Figs. 1 and 2, as well as review articles [5, 24, 45] for more details)). Logically, there are also structural elements that decrease biodegradability – those should be avoided if possible (see Fig. 1 for a summary of structure-biodegradability relationships).
Fig. 1

Elements of ILs’ structure influencing biodegradability

Fig. 2

Example of structure-biodegradability relationship for imidazolium, pyridnium and ammonium cations of ionic liquids

Imidazoliums

The first IL cations to be tested for degradability were the substituted imidazoliums, and multiple studies concerning their degradability can be found in the literature. Generally, N-substituted imidazolium core is largely resistant to degradation [8, 44], whereas C-substituted imidazoliums can be degraded easily [44]. The N,N-substituted imidazolium can be partially degradable, and what makes all the difference is the type and length of the substituent. If the alkyl substituent is too short (C<8) the whole cation is usually not degradable [44], yet when the chain is too long, poor degradability can result from toxicity-driven inhibition of inoculum’s activity [48]. If functional groups susceptible to enzymatic attack are present, they will increase degradability (rate or extent); these include terminal hydroxyls [44], carboxyls [44], or esters [18, 47] given the side chain is long enough [22]. On the contrary, introduction of phenyl [22, 44, 47, 48], allyl [22], nitrile [44], ether [7, 47], or amide [18, 22, 28] group does not improve degradability, i.e., decreased extent or rate of degradability is observed [7]. As can be expected, halogenated [48] substituents are also not favorable. Presence of methyl substituents on C2, C4, and C5 carbon of the imidazolium ring does not favor biodegradability [26]. Imidazoliums normally susceptible to (primary) aerobic degradation, e.g., methyl-octylimidazolium, do not undergo any appreciable degradation under denitrifying conditions [29]. In hydroxyl-octylimidazolium IL, a transformation of terminal hydroxyl to carboxyl was observed in anaerobic environment, followed by shortening of the alkyl chain [29]. Nevertheless, the degradation did not proceed further, and the timeframe was much longer than observed under aerobic conditions.

The dicationic imidazolium IL studied so far did not undergo even primary degradation regardless of the length of the linkage between imidazolium cores (C2 to C6), presence of ether and/or triazole functionalities in it, and substitution with C2 or C6 alkyl chains on imidazolium’s free nitrogen atoms [43]. Tetrakis-imidazoliums and benzimidazoliums substituted with four equal alkyl chains containing 1 to 12 carbons underwent 20% and 56% degradation; nevertheless, taking the distribution of oxidizable carbon in the structure into account, most probably only the alkyl substituents were degraded, leaving the complex imidazolium core unchanged [1].

After several years of modifying the structure of imidazolium-based ILs, by introducing easily degradable functionalities or coupling with easily degradable anions, it became apparent that there is no easy way around stability of imidazolium core. The reader will find a detailed discussion of degradability of “simple” imidazoliums in recent reviews [5, 24, 45] and more information on mechanism of degradation in original research contributions [4, 44].

Pyridiniums

Pyridiniums are generally degradable to higher extent than imidazoliums. Similar dependency of biodegradability of the N-substituted pyridiniums on the side chain length was observed. Yet in cases of longer substituents (C>4) full mineralization including alkyl-3-methyl pyridinium core was also observed [38]. The pyridinium substituted with butyl chain was shown to be degradable in some reports [11, 37, 38, 54] but not in others [9, 11, 31, 44]. Usually, lower substituted homologues are not degradable unless predisposed bacterial strain is used [8, 11, 54] or functional groups favoring biodegradation are present [31]. As in the case of imidazoliums, groups like terminal hydroxyl, carboxyl [15], or ester [8, 21] often but not always [8] increase degradability. Introducing ether, amide, tertiary amine, allyl, benzyl [15], or carbamate [14, 22] functionality has the opposite effect. N-hexyl- and N-octyl-substituted methyl pyridiniums were degradable, and the latter one was classified as readily biodegradable [10, 37]. Surprisingly, in another study, hexyl-methyl-pyridinium was not degraded neither by activated sludge community nor by R. rhodochrous [8]. Increasing the length of substituent to 11 carbons decreases degradability [42]. Dicationic pyridiniums connected via polyether linkage were also poorly degradable [15].

Ammoniums

Generally, decyl- to hexadecyl (C10 to C14)-substituted quaternary ammoniums are fully mineralized, yet the degradation rates usually decrease as the chain increases in length due to propagating toxicity toward inoculum [16]. ILs having sterically more expanded substituents were shown to be nondegradable (see Fig. 2) ([3, 6, 12, 15, 16, 35, 39, 46, 48, 52]).

As for ammonium ILs containing shorter substituents, there are contradicting results regarding degradability of trimethy-butyl-ammonium as it was reported degradable to high extent by activated sludge microorganism [8, 46] or Rhodococcus rhodochrous [8] yet nondegradable by activated sludge organisms on other occasions [39].

High biodegradability is observed if functional groups favoring degradation are present in relatively short substituents offsetting the steric effects as observed for methyl-hydroxyethyl-, dimethylhydroxyethyl-, or dihydroxyethylammonium ILs [33] [32].

Among most often investigated and highly biodegradable ammonium ILs are those based on cholinium cation [27, 39, 46, 53]. As already shown for imidazoliums, also for ammoniums introducing ether [27, 39, 46] functionality decreases biodegradability, whereas ester [8, 27] or hydroxyl group [8, 27, 39, 46, 49] has a positive impact.

Morpholiniums

Methylmorpholinium ILs substituted with short (C≤4) alkyl, alkoxy, hydroxyl, benzyl, or cyano groups were generally poorly degradable [31, 34]. Only in the case of methyl-hydroxypropyl-morpholinium did prolonged exposure result in appreciable mineralization [31]. Quite surprisingly, a reversed chain length dependency of biodegradation was observed by Pretti et al. for methyl-alkyl-morpholiniums [40]. Ethy-substituted IL reached the highest mineralization, followed by butyl-substituted compound with only slightly over 10% degradation. Hexyl-, octyl-, and decyl-substituted methylmorpholiniums did not show any appreciable levels of degradation [40]. Methyl-cyanomethyl-morpholinium underwent abiotic hydrolysis of the cyano group with no further degradation. This phenomenon was also observed for other ILs having cyano-substituted chain [31].

Pyrrolidiniums

Increasing side chain length increases degradability of pyrrolidiniums [31, 38]. Pyrrolidiniums substituted with very short chains, e.g., methyl and ethyl, are not degradable [8, 31]. Butyl-substituted pyrrolidiniums are poorly degradable within standard 28-day test [8, 41, 46]. In some cases, prolonged exposure [31] or using selected microbial strains [8] results in higher biodegradation levels. Yet there are also reports showing no degradation in prolonged ready biodegradability tests [38]. Finally, methyl-octylpyrrolidinium cation was classified as readily biodegradable [31]. Presence of ester group in the side chain of pyrrolidinium increased degradability, and terminal hydroxyl group was even more beneficial since methyl-hydroxypropylpyrrolidinium can be classified as readily degradable [31]. On the other hand, presence of ether functionality results in nondegradable ILs [41]. Comparing various head groups bearing methyl-hydroxypropyl substituents shows that pyrrolidinium is more degradable than morpholinium, piperidinium, pyridinium, and imidazolium. It was also proved that the core itself can be completely mineralized [31]. Dicationic pyrrolidinium linked through ditriazolium-polyether-based group did not undergo primary degradation [43].

Phosphoniums

Comparably, little attention was devoted to phosphonium ILs. Ethyl-tributylphosphonium IL was not degradable and showed moderate toxicity toward microbial inoculum as measured by inhibition of glucose degradation [51]. Trihexyl-tetradecylphosphonium was highly toxic toward the inoculum in concentration of few μmol/L so that the biodegradation could not be measured [51]. Trihexyl-phosphonium ILs bearing ester, ally, alcohol, or ether functionalities were generally poorly biodegradable; the presence of functional groups normally increasing degradability did not have the desired effect in phosphonium ILs [2]. This however might have been due to the bulky structure of these ILs (each bearing three relatively long side chains) rather than phosphonium head group itself.

Other Cations

Among less frequently examined ILs those based on thiazolium, piperidinium, piperazinium, or octanium were generally poorly degradable. Ethyl-thiazolium and hydroxyl-ethyl-thiazoliums resisted degradation [14]. Hexyl- and heptyl-dimethyl-piperazinium as well as hexyl-, heptyl-, and hydroxyethyl-diazabicyclo-octanium were not degradable [15]. Yet in another study, ethyl- to decyl-substituted diazabicyclo-octaniums underwent 20–40% mineralization [40]. Methyl-piperidiniums substituted either with alkyl, alkoxy, or cyano groups were poorly degradable, yet those containing hydroxyethyl or hydroxypropyl chains were classified as inherently degradable and were fully mineralized [31].

Biodegradability of ILs’ Anions

Most of the anions used at the dawn of ILs were inorganic. Since they could not serve as a source of energy or carbon for microorganisms, they are not relevant for biodegradation studies. Fluorinated entities, e.g., [(CF3SO2)2N] or [(C2F5)3PF3], where some carbon present in the molecules is counteracted by rather large amount of highly stable C–F bonds, also resist both aerobic and anaerobic degradation [8, 17, 30]. This is also the case for fluorinated equivalents of anions which are normally biodegradable (e.g., alkylsulfonates or carboxylates) [50]. Cyano-based anions turned out to be nondegradable under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions [17, 30].

The first anion intentionally used to increase degradability was an octylsulfate, which is indeed fully degradable. Depending on what cation it is paired with it can form highly to poorly degradable ILs [17, 19, 28]. Alkyl sulfates containing methyl [51] or hexyl to dodecyl chains were also shown to be degradable [22].

Bio-based anions, e.g., formate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, pentanoate [33], saccharinate [22], lactate [3], succinate [3, 20], acetate [3, 33], sorbate [3], citrate [3], levulinate [3, 27], maleate, and polyethylene glycol [20], were shown to be highly degradable. Yet branched organic acid-based anions were generally not degradable [36]. Branching (valine, leucine, isoleucine) or presence of heterocyclic imidazole or indole ring (histidine and tryptophan) in amino acid-based anions also decreased biodegradability, whereas straight alkyl chains, second carboxylic group, and hydroxyl or amide group increased it [23].

Tetrabutylammonium ILs coupled with lactate, maleate, tartrate, malonate, pyruvate, glucoronate, galacturonate, prolinate, and hydroxyprolinate were shown to form not readily degradable ILs; yet taking into account the proportion of oxidizable carbon in both ions, the extent of degradation corresponded fairly closely to full degradation of the anion [12, 13]. ILs derived from several naphthenic acids as well as benzoic, salicylic, deoxycholic, or lithocholic acids as anions were degradable to high extent when coupled with cholinium cation. On the other hand, anions based on naphtoxy-acetate and anthracene carboxylate showed moderate biodegradability despite presence of cholinium moiety [53]. This is also consistent with general rules of degradability developed for polyaromatic hydrocarbons stating that increasing the number of aromatic rings, degradability decreases.

There are several instances where anions that were expected to be degradable turned out to be rather stable. Both diethylphosphate and dibutylphosphate were not degradable. The latter coupled with phosphonium IL significantly inhibited the activity of inoculum [22, 51]

Anaerobic Versus Aerobic Degradation

Aerobic degradation processes usually occur faster than the anaerobic ones due to much larger energy gain from the former, mandating faster growth of microbes. Therefore, it is to be expected that when the oxygen is lacking, the degradation processes will be slower. Nevertheless, in many environments and for many environmental pollutants, anaerobic processes are very important degradation mechanisms. Investigations into the anoxic degradation of ionic liquids are scarce. Imidazoliums or pyridiniums normally susceptible to, at least partial, aerobic degradation, e.g., methyl-octylimidazolium or N-octylpyridinium, did not undergo any appreciable degradation under denitrifying conditions over a period of 11 months [29]. Terminal hydroxyl group in octylimidazolium IL could be oxidized to carboxyl group within approximately 1 month, yet no further transformation occurred during subsequent 10 months [29]. Fluoro- and cyano-based IL anions were also shown to be resistant to both anaerobic and aerobic degradation [30]. It can be concluded, based on this limited amount of studies, that degradability of ILs under anoxic conditions is poorer than in the presence of oxygen.

Synergistic Effects in Biodegradation

In biodegradability studies, anions and cations are often treated as separate entities; nevertheless, on several occasions, synergistic effects in biodegradability were observed. Anions derived from triglycerides (stearate, oleate) or edible oils (canola, coconut) were fully degradable in ILs formed with trimethyl-hexadecylammonium cation. When one more methyl group in the cation was replaced by bulkier substituent, ILs containing anions based on unsaturated chain (stearate or coconut oil) were poorly degradable, whereas those possessing saturated anions retained their high degradability ([35]). Similarly, dimethyl-dibutylammonium chloride was not degradable, yet when coupled with organic acid-derived anion, the degradability of resulting IL was high and exceeded the theoretical degradability of the anion alone [3]. Cholinium used as a counterion coupled with long-chain fatty acid (C12–C18) resulted in fully degradable compounds where cholinium increased the degradation rate compared to sodium equivalents [25]. Dimethyl-dibutylammonium chloride was not degradable, yet when chloride was replaced by degradable anion derived from organic acid, the IL was degradable to high extent – vastly exceeding the theoretical degradability of anion [3]. On the contrary, the presence of octylsulfate anion significantly decreased the biodegradation rates of 3-methyl-1-(propoxycarbonylmethyl)imidazolium cation as compared to bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide [7].

Cross-References

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Mohammed NN, Duali Hussen RS, Ali TH et al (2015) Tetrakis-imidazolium and benzimidazolium ionic liquids: a new class of biodegradable surfactants. RSC Adv 5:21865–21876.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA14027CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atefi F, Garcia MT, Singer RD, Scammells PJ (2009) Phosphonium ionic liquids: design, synthesis and evaluation of biodegradability. Green Chem 11:1595.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b913057hCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boissou F, Mühlbauer A, De Oliveira VK et al (2014) Transition of cellulose crystalline structure in biodegradable mixtures of renewably-sourced levulinate alkyl ammonium ionic liquids, γ-valerolactone and water. Green Chem 16:2463.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3gc42396dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho C-W, Pham TPT, Kim S et al (2016) Three degradation pathways of 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium cation by activated sludge from wastewater treatment process. Water Res 90:294–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coleman D, Gathergood N (2010) Biodegradation studies of ionic liquids. Chem Soc Rev 39:600–637.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b817717cCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dean-Raymond D, Alexander M (1977) Bacterial metabolism of quaternary ammonium compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1037–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deng Y, Besse-Hoggan P, Sancelme M et al (2011) Influence of oxygen functionalities on the environmental impact of imidazolium based ionic liquids. J Hazard Mater 198:165–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deng Y, Beadham I, Ghavre M et al (2015) When can ionic liquids be considered readily biodegradable? Biodegradation pathways of pyridinium, pyrrolidinium and ammonium-based ionic liquids. Green Chem 17:1479–1491.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4GC01904KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Docherty KM, Dixon JK, Kulpa CF Jr (2007) Biodegradability of imidazolium and pyridinium ionicliquids by an activated sludge microbial community. Biodegradation 18:481–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Docherty KM, Joyce MV, Kulacki KJ, Kulpa CF (2010) Microbial biodegradation and metabolite toxicity of three pyridinium-based cation ionic liquids. Green Chem 12:701–712.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b919154bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Docherty KM, Aiello SW, Buehler BK et al (2015) Ionic liquid biodegradability depends on specific wastewater microbial consortia. Chemosphere 136:160–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferlin N, Courty M, Gatard S et al (2013a) Biomass derived ionic liquids: synthesis from natural organic acids, characterization, toxicity, biodegradation and use as solvents for catalytic hydrogenation processes. Tetrahedron 69:6150–6161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TET.2013.05.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferlin N, Courty M, Van Nhien AN et al (2013b) Tetrabutylammonium prolinate-based ionic liquids: a combined asymmetric catalysis, antimicrobial toxicity and biodegradation assessment. RSC Adv 3:26241–26251.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA43785JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ford L, Harjani JR, Atefi F et al (2010) Further studies on the biodegradation of ionic liquids. Green Chem 12:1783.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0gc00082eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ford L, Ylijoki KEO, Garcia MT et al (2015) Nitrogen-containing ionic liquids: biodegradation studies and utility in base-mediated reactions. Aust J Chem 68:849.  https://doi.org/10.1071/CH14499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garcia MT, Ribosa I, Guindulain T et al (2001) Fate and effect of monoalkyl quaternary ammonium surfactants in the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 111:169–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00322-XCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garcia MT, Gathergood N, Scammells PJ (2005) Biodegradable ionic liquids: Part II. Effect of the anion and toxicology. Green Chem 7:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gathergood N, Garcia MT, Scammells PJ (2004) Biodegradable ionic liquids: Part I. Concept, preliminary targets and evaluation. Green Chem 6:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gathergood N, Scammells PJ, Garcia MT (2006) Biodegradable ionic liquids: Part III. The first readily biodegradable ionic liquids. Green Chem 8:156–160.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b516206hCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gou S, Yin T, Guo Q (2015) Biodegradable polyethylene glycol-based ionic liquids for effective inhibition of shale hydration. RSC Adv 5:32064–32071.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA02236CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harjani RD, Garcia MT, Scammells PJT, Singer JR (2008) The design and synthesis of biodegradable pyridinium ionic liquids. Green Chem 10:436–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harjani JR, Farrell J, Garcia MT et al (2009) Further investigation of the biodegradability of imidazolium ionic liquids. Green Chem 11:821–829.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b900787cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hou X-D, Liu Q-P, Smith TJ et al (2013) Evaluation of toxicity and biodegradability of cholinium amino acids ionic liquids. PLoS One 8:e59145.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jordan A, Gathergood N (2015) Biodegradation of ionic liquids – a critical review. Chem Soc Rev 44:8200–8237.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00444FCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klein R, Müller E, Kraus B et al (2013) Biodegradability and cytotoxicity of choline soaps on human cell lines: effects of chain length and the cation. RSC Adv 3:23347.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra42812eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liwarska-Bizukojc E, Maton C, Stevens CV (2015) Biodegradation of imidazolium ionic liquids by activated sludge microorganisms. Biodegradation 26:453–463.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-015-9747-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Markiewicz M, Maszkowska J, Nardello-Rataj V, Stolte S (2016) Readily biodegradable and low-toxic biocompatible ionic liquids for cellulose processing. RSC Adv.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA14435G
  28. 28.
    Morrissey S, Pegot B, Coleman D et al (2009) Biodegradable, non-bactericidal oxygen-functionalised imidazolium esters: a step towards ‘greener’ ionic liquids. Green Chem 11:475.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b812809jCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neumann J, Grundmann O, Thöming J et al (2010) Anaerobic biodegradability of ionic liquid cations under denitrifying conditions. Green Chem 12:620.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b918453hCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neumann J, Cho C-W, Steudte S et al (2012) Biodegradability of fluoroorganic and cyano-based ionic liquid anions under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Green Chem 14:410–418.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1GC16170ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Neumann J, Steudte S, Cho C-W et al (2014) Biodegradability of 27 pyrrolidinium, morpholinium, piperidinium, imidazolium and pyridinium ionic liquid cations under aerobic conditions. Green Chem 4:2174–2184.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3GC41997ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Papadopoulou AA, Tzani A, Alivertis D et al (2016) Hydroxyl ammonium ionic liquids as media for biocatalytic oxidations. Green Chem 18:1147–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC02381ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peric B, Sierra J, Martí E et al (2013) (Eco)toxicity and biodegradability of selected protic and aprotic ionic liquids. J Hazard Mater 261C:99–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pernak J, Borucka N, Walkiewicz F et al (2011) Synthesis, toxicity, biodegradability and physicochemical properties of 4-benzyl-4-methylmorpholinium-based ionic liquids. Green Chem 13:2901.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1gc15468kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pernak J, Legosz B, Walkiewicz F et al (2015) Ammonium ionic liquids with anions of natural origin. RSC Adv 5:65471–65480.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra11710kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Petkovic M, Ferguson JL, Gunaratne HQN et al (2010) Novel biocompatible cholinium-based ionic liquids – toxicity and biodegradability. Green Chem 12:643–649.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b922247bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pham TPT, Cho C-W, Jeon C-O et al (2009) Identification of metabolites involved in the biodegradation of the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium bromide by activated sludge microorganisms. Environ Sci Technol 43:516–521.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es703004hCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pham TPT, Cho C-W, Yun Y-S (2016) Structural effects of ionic liquids on microalgal growth inhibition and microbial degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:4294–4300.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5287-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pisarova L, Steudte S, Dorr N et al (2012) Ionic liquid long-term stability assessment and its contribution to toxicity and biodegradation study of untreated and altered ionic liquids. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 226:903–922.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650112451696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pretti C, Renzi M, Ettore Focardi S et al (2011) Acute toxicity and biodegradability of N-alkyl-N-methylmorpholinium and N-alkyl-DABCO based ionic liquids. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:748–753.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.10.032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Samorì C, Campisi T, Fagnoni M et al (2015) Pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquids: aquatic ecotoxicity, biodegradability, and algal subinhibitory stimulation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:1860–1865.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stasiewicz M, Mulkiewicz E, Tomczak-Wandzel R et al (2008) Assessing toxicity and biodegradation of novel, environmentally benign ionic liquids (1-alkoxymethyl-3-hydroxypyridinium chloride, saccharinate and acesulfamates) on cellular and molecular level. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71:157–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.08.011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Steudte S, Bemowsky S, Mahrova M et al (2014) Toxicity and biodegradability of dicationic ionic liquids. RSC Adv 4:5198.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra45675gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stolte S, Abdulkarim S, Arning J et al (2008) Primary biodegradation of ionic liquid cations, identification of degradation products of 1-methyl-3-octyl -imidazolium chloride and electrochemical waste water treatment of poorly biodegradable compounds. Green Chem 10:214–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stolte S, Steudte S, Igartua A, Stepnowski P (2011) The biodegradation of ionic liquids – the view from a chemical structure perspective. Curr Org Chem 15:1946–1973.  https://doi.org/10.2174/138527211795703603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stolte S, Steudte S, Areitioaurtena O et al (2012) Ionic liquids as lubricants or lubrication additives: an ecotoxicity and biodegradability assessment. Chemosphere 89:1135–1141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stolte S, Schulz T, Cho C-WW et al (2013) Synthesis, toxicity, and biodegradation of tunable aryl alkyl ionic liquids (TAAILs). ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:410–418.  https://doi.org/10.1021/sc300146tCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thu HBT, Markiewicz M, Thöming J et al (2015) Catalytically active perrhenate based ionic liquids: a preliminary ecotoxicity and biodegradability assessment. New J Chem 39.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nj00404g
  49. 49.
    Tzani A, Douka A, Papadopoulos A et al (2013) Synthesis of biscoumarins using recyclable and biodegradable task-specific ionic liquids. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:1180–1185.  https://doi.org/10.1021/sc4001093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vieira NSM, Stolte S, Araújo JMM et al (2019) Acute aquatic toxicity and biodegradability of fluorinated ionic liquids. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:3733–3741.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wells AS, Coombe VT (2006) On the freshwater ecotoxicity and biodegradation properties of some common ionic liquids. Org Process Res Dev 10:794–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ying G-G (2006) Fate, behavior and effects of surfactants and their degradation products in the environment. Environ Int 32:417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yu Y, Lu X, Zhou Q et al (2008) Biodegradable naphthenic acid ionic liquids: synthesis, characterization, and quantitative structure-biodegradation relationship. Chem Eur J 14:11174–11182.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200800620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhang C, Wang H, Malhotra SV et al (2010) Biodegradation of pyridinium-based ionic liquids by an axenic culture of soil Corynebacteria. Green Chem 12:851–858.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b924264cCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Water ChemistryTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Chunxi Li
    • 1
  • Stefan Stolte
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Chemical EngineeringBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingP. R. China
  2. 2.Department of Hydrosciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Water ChemistryTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany