Advertisement

Ethnographic Method

  • Bonnie PangEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter explores the use of a range of ethnographic methods within qualitative methodology. Alongside introducing the building blocks of ethnographic methods, with a focus on reflexivity, participant-observation, fieldwork, and visual and sensory methods, it will draw upon my experiences in studying young Chinese Australians’ lived experiences in health and physical activity. My experiences in the field provide insights into the potentials and perils of using some of these ethnographic methods and issues navigating research ethics. I emphasize the advantages of an approach that allows for innovative and unique interactions between the researcher and research participants within the participants’ real-life environments. The use of innovative ethnographic methods encourages thinking and practice beyond traditional modes of enquiry and beyond understanding the participants’ lived experiences through texts and numbers alone.

Keywords

Ethnographic methods Participant-observations Reflexivity Visual methods Sensory methods Lived experiences 

References

  1. Atkinson P, Hammersley M. Ethnography: principles in practice. 3rd ed. London/New York: Routledge; 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, editors. Handbook of ethnography. London: SAGE; 2001. p. 1–7.Google Scholar
  3. Azzarito L. Ways of seeing the body in kinesiology: a case for visual methodologies. Quest. 2010;62(2):155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker TA, Wang CC. Photovoice: use of a participatory action research method to explore the chronic pain experience in older adults. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(10):1405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks M. Using visual data in qualitative research. London: SAGE; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Berg BL. Methods for the social sciences. Boston: Pearson Education; 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield; 2017.Google Scholar
  8. Bryman A. Social research methods. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  9. Bustle LS, editor. Image, inquiry, and transformative practice: engaging learners in creative and critical inquiry through visual representation, vol. 203. New York: Peter Lang Pub Incorporated; 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Carpiano RM. Come take a walk with me: the “go-along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health Place. 2009;15(1):263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrington S, Allen K, Osmolowski D. Visual narrative: a technique to enhance secondary students’ contribution to the development of inclusive, socially just school environments – lessons from a box of crayons. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2007;7(1):8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casey ES. Between geography and philosophy: what does it mean to be in the place-world? Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2001;91(4):683–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang H. Autoethnography as method. London/New York: Routledge; 2008.Google Scholar
  14. Clark-Ibáñez M. Inner-city children in sharper focus: sociology of childhood and photo elicitation interviews. In: Stanczak GC, editor. Visual research methods: image, society, and representation. London: SAGE; 2007. p. 167–96.Google Scholar
  15. Costello L, McDermott ML, Wallace R. Netnography: range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies CA. Reflexive ethnography: a guide to researching selves and others. New York: Routledge; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. DeWalt KM, DeWalt BR. Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. Walnut Creek: Rowman Altamira; 2011.Google Scholar
  18. Dowling. Methods of critical place inquiry. In: Tuck E, McKenzie M, editors. Place in research: theory, methodology, and methods, vol. 9. New York/London: Routledge; 2015.Google Scholar
  19. Downey G. Learning capoeira: lessons in cunning from an Afro-Brazilian art. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  20. Dwyer SC, Buckle JL. The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(1):54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finlay L, Gough B. Reflexivity: a practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fletcher T. ‘Does he look like a Paki?’ An exploration of ‘whiteness’, positionality and reflexivity in inter-racial sports research. Q Res Sport, Exerc Health. 2014;6(2):244–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goffman E. On fieldwork. J Contemp Ethnogr. 1989;18(2):123–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1994. p. 105–17.Google Scholar
  25. Harper D. Talking about pictures: a case for photo elicitation. Vis Stud. 2002;17(1):13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harper D. Visual sociology. New York: Routledge; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrison B. Seeing health and illness worlds–using visual methodologies in a sociology of health and illness: a methodological review. Sociol Health Illn. 2002;24(6):856–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill J, Azzarito L. Representing valued bodies in PE: a visual inquiry with British Asian girls. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2012;17(3):263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howes D. Empire of the senses. Oxford: Berg Publishers; 2005.Google Scholar
  30. Ingold T. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge; 2000.Google Scholar
  31. Ingold T. Bindings against boundaries: entanglements of life in an open world. Environ Plan A. 2008;40(8):1796–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson M. At home in the world. Durham: Duke University Press; 1995. p. 163.Google Scholar
  33. Kozinets R. Netnography: redefined. London: SAGE; 2015.Google Scholar
  34. Liamputtong P. Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  36. Liamputtong P. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017.Google Scholar
  37. Liamputtong P, Rumbold J. Knowing differently: arts-based and collaborative research methods. New York: Nova Publishers; 2008.Google Scholar
  38. Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing qualitative research. 5th ed. London: SAGE; 2014.Google Scholar
  39. McCorkel JA, Myers K. What difference does difference make? Position and privilege in the field. Qual Sociol. 2003;26(2):199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Merleau-Ponty M. The primacy of perception and other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history, and politics. Illinois: Northwestern University Press; 1964.Google Scholar
  41. Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Wiley; 2015.Google Scholar
  42. Millington B, Wilson B. Media analysis in physical cultural studies: from production to reception. In: Young K, Atkinson M, editors. Qualitative research on sport and physical culture. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2012. p. 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morrison ZJ, Gregory D, Thibodeau S. “Thanks for using me”: an exploration of exit strategy in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2012;11(4):416–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’reilly K. Ethnographic methods. London/New York: Routledge; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pang B. Conducting research with young Chinese-Australian students in health and physical education and physical activity: epistemology, positionality and methodologies. Sport Educ Soc. 2016;1–12.Google Scholar
  46. Pang B, Macdonald D, Hay P. ‘Do I have a choice?’ The influences of family values and investments on Chinese migrant young people’s lifestyles and physical activity participation in Australia. Sport Educ Soc. 2015;20(8):1048–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pink S. Doing visual ethnography. London: SAGE; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pink S, editor. Visual interventions: applied visual anthropology, vol. 4. Oxford: Berghahn Books; 2009.Google Scholar
  49. Pink S. Doing sensory ethnography. London: SAGE; 2015.Google Scholar
  50. Rapley T. Analysing conversation. In: Seale C, editor. Researching society and culture. London: SAGE; 2004. p. 383–96.Google Scholar
  51. Rich E, O’Connell K. Visual methods in physical culture: body culture exhibition. In: Young K, editor. Qualitative research on sport and physical culture. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2012. p. 101–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rose G. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. London: SAGE; 2016.Google Scholar
  53. Schwandt TA. Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In: Handbook of qualitative research, vol. 2. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2000. p. 189–213.Google Scholar
  54. Schwartz D. Visual ethnography: using photography in qualitative research. Qual Sociol. 1989;12(2):119–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sparkes A. Telling tales in sport and physical activity: a qualitative journey. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2002.Google Scholar
  56. Sunderland N, Bristed H, Gudes O, Boddy J, Da Silva M. What does it feel like to live here? Exploring sensory ethnography as a collaborative methodology for investigating social determinants of health in place. Health Place. 2012;18(5):1056–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thrift N. Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. Geogr Ann Ser B. 2004;86(1):57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tuck E, McKenzie M. Place in research: theory, methodology, and methods, vol. 9. New York/London: Routledge; 2015.Google Scholar
  59. Varis P. Chapter 3 Digital ethnography. In: Georgakopoulou A, Spilioti T, editors. The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. London/New York: Routledge; 2016. p. 55–68.Google Scholar
  60. Willis C, Anderson K. Ethnography as health research. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practices. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 121–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Science and Health and Institute for Culture and SocietyUniversity of Western SydneyPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations