Advertisement

Semistructured Life History Calendar Method

  • Ingrid A. NelsonEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

The Life History Calendar (LHC) methodology was pioneered for large-scale quantitative life course studies but has since been adapted for various research goals across the health-related fields and social science disciplines. This chapter explores the potential of a semistructured Life History Calendar administered in tandem with open-ended interviewing to facilitate qualitative life course research. By merging the depth across multiple social contexts characteristic of the Life History Calendar method with explanatory data gleaned from interviews, this semistructured protocol succeeds at producing nuanced longitudinal data. In this chapter, I highlight the benefits and limitations of the semistructured Life History Calendar method, address common implementation issues, and offer examples of how the semistructured Life History Calendar method has been used to study trajectories of education, employment, health, and other topics, among diverse populations.

Keywords

Ecological systems theory Event history analysis Life course theory Life History Calendar method Qualitative social research Social pathways 

References

  1. Axinn WG, Barber J, Ghimire D. The neighborhood history calendar: a data collection method designed for dynamic multilevel modeling. Sociol Methodol. 1997;27:355–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axinn WG, Pearce LD, Ghimire D. Innovations in LHC applications. Soc Sci Res. 1999;28:243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belli RF. The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory. 1998;6:383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belli RF, Shay WL, Stafford FP. Event history calendars and question list surveys: a direct comparison of interviewing methods. Public Opin Q. 2001;65:45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belli RF, Lee EH, Stafford FP, Chow CH. Calendar and question-list survey methods: association between interviewer behavior and data quality. J Off Stat. 2004;20(2):185–218.Google Scholar
  6. Belli RF, Stafford FP, Alwin D, editors. Calendar and time diary methods in life course research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009.Google Scholar
  7. Blum Z, Karweit N, Sorensen A. A method for the collection and analysis of retrospective life histories. Report no. 48. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for the Social Organization of schools; 1969.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1979.Google Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner U, Morris P. The bioecological model of human development. In: Damon W, Lerner RM, editors. Handbook of child psychology. 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2006. p. 793–828.Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter LM. Studying sexualities from a life course perspective. In: DeLamater J, Plante RF, editors. Handbook of the sociology of sexualities. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Thornton A, Freedman D, Amell JW, Harrington H, et al. The LHC: a research and clinical assessment method for collecting retrospective event-history data. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1996;6:101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elder G Jr. Children of the great depression: social change in life experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1974.Google Scholar
  13. Elder G Jr, Shanahan M, Jennings J. Human development in time and place. In: Lerner RM, editor. Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, vol. 4. Hoboken: Wiley; 2015. p. 6–54.Google Scholar
  14. Feldman S, Howie L. Looking back, looking forward: reflections on using a life history review with older people. J Appl Gerentol. 2009;28:621–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freedman D, Thorton A, Camburn D, Alwin D, Young-DeMarco L. The LHC: a technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociol Methodol. 1988;18:37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Furstenberg FF, Brooks-Gunn J, Morgan SP. Adolescent mothers in later life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giele JZ, Elder GH, editors. Methods of life course research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.Google Scholar
  18. Harris DA, Parisi D. Adapting LHCs for qualitative research on welfare transitions. Field Methods. 2007;19(1):40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoppin JA, Tolbert PE, Flagg EW, Blair A, Zahm SH. Use of a life events calendar approach to elicit occupational history from farmers. Am J Ind Med. 1998;34:470–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hser YI, Anglin MD, Grella C, Longshore D, Prendergast ML. Drug treatment careers: a conceptual framework and existing research findings. J Subst Abus Treat. 1997;14(6):543–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kessler RC, Wethington E. The reliability of life event reports in a community survey. Psychol Med. 1991;21:723–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laub JH, Sampson RJ. Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  23. Lilley RC, Cryer PC, Firth HM, Herbison GP, Feyer AM. Ascertainment of occupational health histories in the working population: the occupational history calendar approach. Am J Ind Med. 2011;54:21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martyn KK, Belli RF. Retrospective data collection using event history calendars. Nurs Res. 2002;51:270–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martyn KK, Reifsnider E, Barry MG, Trevino MB, Murray A. Protective processes of Latina adolescents. Hispanic Health Care Int. 2006;4(2):111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McPherson JM, Popielarz PA, Drobnic S. Social networks and organizational dynamics. Am Sociol Rev. 1992;57(2):153–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meltzer P. Using the self-discovery tapestry to explore occupational careers. J Occup Sci. 2001;8:16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mortimer J, Johnson M. Adolescents’ part-time work and post-secondary transition pathways in the United States. In: Heinz WR, editor. From education to work: Cross-national perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 111–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mortimer J, Shanahan M, editors. Handbook of the life course. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2003.Google Scholar
  30. Munch A, McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L. Gender, children, social contact: the effects of childrearing for men and women. Am Sociol Rev. 1997;62(4):153–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson IA. From quantitative to qualitative: adapting the life history calendar method. Field Methods. 2010;22(4):413–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson IA. Why afterschool matters. Camden, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2017.Google Scholar
  33. O'Connor K, Robert M, Pérodeau G, Séguin M. Trajectory-based methods in clinical psychology: a person centred narrative approach. New Ideas Psychol. 2015;39:12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Porcellato L, Carmichael F, Hulme C. Using occupational history calendars to capture lengthy and complex working lives: a mixed method approach with older people. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2016;19(3):269–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reisner SL, Hughto JMW, Pardee DJ, Kuhns L, Garofalo R, Mimiaga MJ. LifeSkills for men (LS4M): pilot evaluation of a gender-affirmative HIV and STI prevention intervention for young adult transgender men who have sex with men. J Urban Health. 2016;93(1):189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rimkeviciene J, O’Gorman J, Hawgood J, Leo DD. Timelines for difficult times: use of visual timelines in interviewing suicide attempters. Qual Res Psychol. 2016;13(3):231–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith JR. Unequal burdens of loss: examining the frequency and timing of homicide deaths experienced by young black men across the life course. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(S3):S483–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson KD. Questioning the long-term English learner label: how categorization can blind us to students’ abilities. Teach Coll Rec. 2015;117(12):1–50.Google Scholar
  39. Thornton A, Axinn WG, Hill DH. Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. Am J Sociol. 1992;98(3):628–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van der Vaart W. The time-line as a device to enhance recall in standardized research interviews: a split ballot study. J Off Stat. 2004;20(2):301–17.Google Scholar
  41. Van der Vaart W, Glasner TJ. Applying a timeline as a recall aid in a telephone survey: a record check study. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2007;21(2):217–38.Google Scholar
  42. Vermeer WM, Bakker RM, Kenter GG, Stiggelbout AM, ter Kuile MM. Cervical cancer survivors’ and partners’ experiences with sexual dysfunction and psychosexual support. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24:1679–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yoshihama M, Clum K, Crampton A, Gillespie B. Measuring the lifetime experience of domestic violence: application of the LHC method. Violence Vict. 2002;17(3):297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yoshihama M, Gillespie B, Hammock A, Belli RF, Tolman R. Does the life-history calendar method facilitate the recall of domestic violence victimization? Comparison of two methods of data collection. Soc Work Res. 2005;29(3):151–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zahm S, Colt J, Engel L, Kiefer M, Alvarado A, Burau K, Blair A. Development of a life events/icon calendar questionnaire to ascertain occupational histories and other characteristics of migrant farmworkers. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology and Anthropology DepartmentBowdoin CollegeBrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations