Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 1321-1337 | Cite as
Netnography: Researching Online Populations
This chapter explores the transition of netnography, a consumer marketing research method, to the field of health social science research. In contemporary society, the Internet has become an essential communication and information medium. Researchers are increasingly using the Internet as a research medium for participant recruitment and data collection. Netnography, an adaptation of ethnography, is primarily concerned with online communication as a source of data to form an understanding of a cultural phenomenon. It is through the use of this qualitative research method that holistic research about online cultures and communities can be conducted. In the provision of a common set of methodological procedures and protocols, netnography contributes to the debate of researching online populations, and innovation in appropriate settings. Using the example of a study related to fitness communities on social networking sites (SNSs), this chapter will identify key strengths, practical implications, and ethical considerations of netnography. Discussion focuses on netnography as a dynamic adaptation of a research method emerging in the field of health social sciences research.
KeywordsNetnography Qualitative research Innovative methods Health research Social networking sites Online research
I acknowledge the receipt of the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.
- Amit V, Rapport N. The trouble with community: anthropological reflections on movement, identity and collectively. London: Pluto; 2002.Google Scholar
- Association of Internet Researchers Ethics Working Group. Ethical decision-making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). 2012. http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2016.
- Bean EA. Man shall not live by bread, at all: a netnography of the key characteristics and purposes of an online gluten-free community. Brigham Young University, all theses and dissertations. Paper 4082. 2014.Google Scholar
- Bengry-Howell A, Wiles R, Nind M, & Crow G. A review of the academic impact of three methodological innovations: netnoraphy, child-led research and creative research methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. University of Southamption. NCRM Hub. 2011.Google Scholar
- Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five aproaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.Google Scholar
- Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2005.Google Scholar
- Dholakia N, Zhang D. Online qualitative research in the age of e-commerce: data sources and approaches. Forum Qual Soc Res Sozialforschung. 2004;5(2), Art. 29. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/594/1289. Accessed 25 Apr 2014.
- Facebook. Statement of rights and responsibilities. 2014. http://www.facebook.com/legal/terms. Accessed 10 June 2015.
- Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage; 2008.Google Scholar
- Grbich C. Qualitative data analysis: an introduction. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2013.Google Scholar
- Hine C. The internet and research methods. In: Gilbert N, editor. Researching social life. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2008. p. 304–20.Google Scholar
- Kozinets R. ‘I want to believe’: a netnography of the X-philes’ subculture of consumption. Adv Consum Res. 1997;24:470–5.Google Scholar
- Kozinets R. Netnography: doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage; 2010.Google Scholar
- Kozinets R. Netnography: redefined. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2015.Google Scholar
- Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- Liamputtong P, Serry T. Making sense of qualitative data. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 421–36.Google Scholar
- Paccagnella L. Getting the seats of your pants dirty: strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. J Comput Mediat Commun. 1997;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00065.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaap R. The words that took us there: ethnography in virtual ethnography. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers; 2002.Google Scholar
- Serry T, Liamputtong P. Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis (CAQDAS). In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 437–50.Google Scholar
- Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage; 2006.Google Scholar
- Walther J. Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: human subjects issues and methodological myopia, vol. 4 (pp. 205–216). 2002. http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_wal_full.html: Ethics Information Technology.
- Welsh E. Dealing with data: using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum Qual Social Res Sozialforschung. 2002;3(2), Art. 26. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/865/1880. Accessed 18 Apr 2015.