Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 1973-1989 | Cite as
Ethics and Practice of Research with People Who Use Drugs
Global harm-reduction strategies aim to prevent or reduce the severity of problems associated with nonmedical use of dependence-causing drugs including alcohol. However, harm reduction strategies have to fit the personal, social, and environmental context of people using drugs to be effective. The best way to develop strategies that fit is to research and understand drug use practices including how, why, and when drugs are used. This chapter discusses a number of ethical and practical factors to consider when planning and conducting research with people who use drugs. Data collection challenges include recruitment of a marginalized and hidden population, gaining consent, ensuring anonymity and responding to harm and distress. Examples are drawn from the author’s research on alcohol and other drug use in rural Australian settings including farming and fishing workplaces, on illicit fentanyl use, and with people in treatment.
KeywordsDrug use Data collection Ethics Intoxication Harm reduction Cognitive impairment
- Butler L, Burns L, Breen C. Social media as a recruitment tool for drug use surveys. 2017. Retrieved on 25 Apr 2017 from National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Australia https://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/ndarc/resources/EDRSapril2017_FINAL.PDF.
- Collings S, Dew A, Dowse L, Cooney E. Evaluation of project RE-PIN. Receive, encode, process and INtegrate drug and alcohol treatment strategies for people with cognitive impairment: final report. 2017. Retrieved on 25 Apr 2017 from www.lyndon.org.au/research/.
- Horyniak D, Higgs P, Jenkinson R, Degenhardt L, Stoove M, Kerr T, Dietze P. Establishing the Melbourne injecting drug user cohort study (MIX): rationale, methods, and baseline and twelve-month follow-up results. Harm Reduct J. 2013;10:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-10-11. http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/10/1/1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Humeniuk R. Validation of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST) and pilot brief intervention: A technical report of phase II findings of the WHO ASSIST Project. 2010. Retrieved May 29, 2015 from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/activities/assist_technicalreport_phase2_final.pdf.
- Liamputtong P. Researching the Vulnerable: A Guide to Sensitive Research Methods. Sage Publications, London; 2007.Google Scholar
- Lim R. Drug use and other risky behaviours in young people attending a music festival. In: Paper presented 15, October, 2013 at the national drug trends conference, Melbourne. 2013. https://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/event/2013-national-drug-trends-conference.
- Lee FSL, Vogel D, Limayem M. Virtual Community Informatics: A Review and Research Agenda, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA). 2003; 5:1, Article 5. Retrieved on 23 April, 2017 from http://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol5/iss1/5.
- NAOMI Patients Association and Boyd. NAOMI research survivors: experiences and recommendations. North American opiate medication initiative. Vancouver: British Columbia. 2012. Retrieved on 2 Nov 2015 from http://drugpolicy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/NPAreportMarch5-12.pdf.
- Olde Rikkert MG, Verweij MF, Hoefnagels WH. Informed consent and mental competence of the elderly in medical-scientific studies. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1995;26(4):152–62Google Scholar
- World Health Organisation [WHO]. WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence. Twentieth report. World Health Organ Technical Report Series; 1974. p.1–89.Google Scholar
- World Health Organisation [WHO]. WHO expert committee on drug dependence. 2016. Retrieved on 25 Apr 2017 from http://www.who.int/medicines/access/controlled-substances/ECDD_38th_Report_Unedited_version_13032017.pdf?ua=1.