Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 2127-2143 | Cite as
The Internet and Research Methods in the Study of Sex Research: Investigating the Good, the Bad, and the (Un)ethical
The Internet has thoroughly revolutionized sex. On an individual level, the technology has become a key source in exploring sexuality, researching sexual interests, and participating in erotic activity, both vicariously and potentially even physically. For scholars, the Internet has given effortless access to academic databases and archives, to social media sites and public diaries, and notably to a world of possible research participants, in turn dramatically altering the ways sex gets studied. This chapter outlines, analyzes, and problematizes the use of the Internet in sex research, drawing on a wide range of literature on research ethics as well as my own background as a sex researcher, an author of a range of recent material specifically about the Internet, a supervisor of several dissertations on new media, and a long-time member of my university’s human ethics committee.
KeywordsInternet Sexuality Ethics New media Technology Sexology
- Cardell K. Dear world: contemporary uses of the diary. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press; 2014.Google Scholar
- Coulson N. Online research methods for psychologists. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.Google Scholar
- Fay D, Haddadi H, Seto MC, Wang H, Kling C. An exploration of fetish social networks and communities. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2015:195–204. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.01436v1.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2016.
- Hague P, Hague N, Morgan C. Market research in practice: how to get greater insight from your market. Philadelphia: Kogan Page; 2013.Google Scholar
- Irvine J. Disorders of desire: sex and gender in modern American sexology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
- Kimberly C. Permission to cheat: ethnography of a swingers’ convention. Sex Conv. 2016;20(1):56–68.Google Scholar
- Lenihan A, Kelly-Holmes. Virtual ethnography. In: Hua Z, editor. Research methods in intercultural communication: a practical guide. Malden: Wiley; 2016. p. 255–67.Google Scholar
- Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- Lomborg S. Social media, social genres: making sense of the ordinary. New York: Routledge; 2014.Google Scholar
- Mallon T. A book of one’s own: people and their diaries. New York: Ticknow & Fields; 1984.Google Scholar
- Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.Google Scholar
- Roller M, Lavrakas PJ. Applied qualitative research design: a total quality framework approach. New York: The Guilford Press; 2015.Google Scholar
- Rosewarne L. Part-time perverts: sex, pop culture and kink management. Santa Barbara: Praeger; 2011.Google Scholar
- Rosewarne L. American taboo: the forbidden words, unspoken rules, and secret morality of popular culture. Santa Barbara: Praeger; 2013.Google Scholar
- Rosewarne L. Masturbation in pop culture: screen, society, self. Lanham: Lexington Books; 2014.Google Scholar
- Rosewarne L. Cyberbullies, cyberactivists, eyberpredators: film, TV, and Internet stereotypes. Santa Barbara: Praeger; 2016b.Google Scholar
- Rosewarne L. Choose your own (miss) adventure: single ladyhood in 2016. Meanjin. 2016d;75(3):32–40.Google Scholar
- Wagner G, Bondil P, Dabees K, Dean J, Fourcroy J, Gingell C, Kingsberg S, Kothari P, Rubio-Aurioles E, Ugarte F, Navarrete RV. Ethical aspects of sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2004;2(1):163–8.Google Scholar
- Waynberg J. 1908–2008: a century of sexology and still no legitimacy? Theol Sex. 2009;18(1):1–3.Google Scholar
- Wu T. What ever happened to Google Books? The New Yorker, September 11. 2015. http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/what-ever-happened-to-google-books. Accessed 10 June 2016.