Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 1013-1026 | Cite as
Appraisal of Qualitative Studies
The appraisal of health research is an essential skill required of readers in order to determine the extent to which the findings may inform evidence-based policy and practice. The appraisal of qualitative research remains highly contentious, and there is a lack of consensus regarding a standard approach to appraising qualitative studies. Different guides and tools are available for the critical appraisal of qualitative research. While these guides propose different criteria for assessment, overarching principles of rigor have been widely adopted, and these include credibility, dependability, confirmability, transferability, and reflexivity. This chapter will discuss the importance of appraising qualitative research, the principles and techniques for establishing rigor, and future directions regarding the use of guidelines to appraise qualitative research.
KeywordsAppraisal Quality criteria Qualitative research Rigor Trustworthiness
- Anyan F. The influence of power shifts in data collection and analysis stages: a focus on qualitative research interview. Qual Rep. 2013;18(18):1.Google Scholar
- CASP. CASP qualitative research checklist. http://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/dded87_25658615020e427da194a325e7773d42.pdf. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2017).
- Hill A, Spittlehouse C. Evidence based medicine-what is critical appraisal. Newmarket: Heyward Med Commun; 2003.Google Scholar
- Kitto SC, Chesters J, Grbich C. Quality in qualitative research. Med J Aust. 2008;188(4):243.Google Scholar
- Krueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Singapore: Sage; 2014.Google Scholar
- Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. N Dir Eval. 1986;1986(30):73–84.Google Scholar
- Mays N, Pope C. Quality in qualitative health research. In: Qualitative research in health care. 3rd ed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK. 2007. p. 82–101.Google Scholar
- Noyes J, Popay J, Pearson A, Hannes K. 20 qualitative research and Cochrane reviews. Jackie Chandler (ed.) In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. United Kingdom: The Cochrane Collaboration. 2008. p. 571.Google Scholar
- Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1189.Google Scholar
- Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.Google Scholar
- Spencer, L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, and Dillon L. Quality in Qualitative Evaluatoin: A framework for assessing research evidence, Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office, London: Cabinet Office. 2003.Google Scholar