Counter-Terrorism Detention in Wartime and Emergency

  • Andrea PreziosiEmail author
Reference work entry
Part of the International Human Rights book series (IHR)


The climate of panic and fear that followed the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and the subsequent war on terror has influenced the states’ response against terrorism. The real or perceived increase in the level of threat posed by terrorism has generated the conviction in many governments that security can be effectively pursued only by diminishing the protection afforded by rights. Against this backdrop, the chapter analyzes the regimes applicable to counter-terrorism detention under international humanitarian law and international human rights law, by underlining their specificities and their reciprocal interaction. The chapter demonstrates how states have attempted to distort the set of rules governing detention under either regime, undermining the fundamental guarantees available to suspected terrorists held in detention. On this respect, it is highlighted the pivotal role played by the right to challenge the lawfulness of one’s detention as safeguard against arbitrariness in wartime and emergency. The chapter shows that counter-terrorism detention practices, as well as other restrictive measures such as control orders, are chiefly rooted in a logic of preemption that does not always culminate in the prosecution of alleged terrorists. Through the exposition of the US and the UK experience, it is illustrated the discriminatory nature of some detention practices that have overwhelmingly targeted specific groups of people. The challenges of counter-terrorism detention are examined through the account of the frequent confrontations between governments and national and international courts, showing how the judiciary has played an active role in resisting the attempts to weaken the protection afforded to suspected terrorists by human rights.


Detention Counter-terrorism Unlawful combatants Judicial review State of emergency Control orders Special advocates Extraterritoriality 


  1. Ashworth A (2007) Security, terrorism and the value of human rights. In: Goold B, Lazarus L (eds) Security and human rights. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 201–226Google Scholar
  2. Barak-Erez D, Waxman AC (2009) Secret evidence and the due process of terrorist detentions. Colorado J Trans Law 48(3):3–60Google Scholar
  3. Bates E (2006) A ‘Public emergency threatening the life of the nation’? The United Kingdom’s derogation from the European Convention on Human Rights of 18 December 2001 and the ‘A’ case. BYBIL 76(1):245–336. Scholar
  4. Bates E (2009) Anti-terrorism control orders: liberty and security still in the balance. Leg Stud 29:99–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Dor G, Pedahzur A (2003) The uniqueness of Islamic fundamentalism and the fourth wave of international terrorism. Totalitarian Mov Polit Relig 4(3):71–90. Scholar
  6. Bianchi A (2010) Fear’s legal dimension: counterterrorism and human rights. In: Boisson de Chazournes L, Kohen M (eds) International law in quest of its implementation: essays in honour of Vera Gowlland-Debbas. Brull, Leiden/Boston, pp 175–192Google Scholar
  7. Davis FF, de Londras F (eds) (2014) Critical debates on counter-terrorism judicial review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Scholar
  8. Dennis M (2005) Application of human rights treaties extraterritorially in times of armed conflict and military occupation. Am J Int L 99(1):119–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dörmann K (2003) The legal situation of “unlawful/unprivileged combatants”. IRRC 849(85):45–74. Available at Accessed 20 June 2018Google Scholar
  10. Droege C (2008) Elective affinities? Human rights and humanitarian law. IRRC 871(90):501–548. Available at Accessed 20 June 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duffy H (2008) Human rights litigation and the “war on terror”. IRRC 871(90). Available at Accessed 20 June 2018
  12. Dworkin R (2002) The threat to patriotism. The New York Review of Books. Available at: Accessed 21 June 2018
  13. Gross O, Ni Aoláin F (2006) Law in times of crisis: emergency powers in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Scholar
  14. Hakimi M (2009) International standards for detaining terrorism suspects: moving beyond the armed conflict-criminal divide. Case West Reserv J Int Law 40(3):593–650Google Scholar
  15. Human Rights Committee (2001) CCPR General Comment No. 29: Article 4: derogations during a state of emergency, UN Doc. CCPR/C/2I/Rev. 1, Add. 11. Available at Accessed 21 June 2018
  16. Human Rights Watch (2011) US: act on pledge to close Guantanamo. Indefinite detention nine years later with no end in sight. Available at Accessed 21 June 2018
  17. Hunt A (2014) From control orders to TPIMs: variations on a number of themes in British legal responses to terrorism. CL&SC 62(3):289–321. Scholar
  18. de Londras F (2008) What human rights law could do: lamenting the lack of an international human rights law approach in Boumediene and Al Odah. Isr Law Rev 41(3):562–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Londras F (2011) Detention in the “war on terror”: can human rights fight back? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Londras F (2014) Counter-terrorist detention and international human rights law. In: Saul B (ed) Research handbook on international law and terrorism. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, pp 401–417Google Scholar
  21. Luban D (2009) Eight fallacies about liberty and security. In: Ashby Wilson R (ed) Human rights in the “war on terror”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 242–257Google Scholar
  22. Macken C (2011) Counter-terrorism and the detention of suspected terrorists: preventive detention and international human rights law. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  23. McCulloch J, Pickering S (2009) Pre-crime and counter-terrorism: imagining future crime in the ‘war on terror’. Br J Criminol 49(5):628–645. Scholar
  24. Milanovic M (2011) Norm conflicts, international humanitarian law and human rights law. In: Ben-Naftali O (ed) International humanitarian law and international human rights law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 95–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Milanovic M (2012) Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg. Eur J Int Law 23(1):121–139. Scholar
  26. Murphy CC (2013) Counter-terrorism and the culture of legality: the case of special advocates. King’s Law J 24:19–37. Scholar
  27. Naqvi Y (2002) Doubtful prisoner-of-war status. IRRC 847(84):571–595. Available at Accessed 22 June 2018Google Scholar
  28. Ni Aoláin F (2007a) The no-gaps approach to parallel application in the context of the war on terror. Isr Law Rev 40(2):563–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ni Aoláin F (2007b) Hamdan and common article 3: did the supreme court get it right? Minn Law Rev 91:1525–1563Google Scholar
  30. Sassoli M (2006) Query: is there a status of “unlawful combatant”? In: Jacques RB (ed) Issues in international law and military operations. Naval War College Press, Newport, pp 57–67Google Scholar
  31. Shani Y (2011) Human rights and humanitarian law as competing legal paradigms for fighting terror. In: Ben-Naftali O (ed) International humanitarian law and international human rights law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 13–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Australia: study on human rights compliance while countering terrorism, UN Doc. A/HRC/4/26/Add.3 (14 December 2006). Available at Accessed 21 June 2018
  33. Waldron J (2003) Security and liberty: the image of balance. J Polit Philos 11:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walker C (2007) Keeping control of terrorists without losing control of constitutionalism. Stanf Law Rev 59(5):1395–1463Google Scholar
  35. Walker C (2014) Blackstone’s guide to the anti-terrorism legislation, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Fact sheet no. 26 (May 2000). Available at Accessed 22 June 2018
  37. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Report to the Human Rights Council, UN Doc. A/HRC/22/44 (24 December 2012). Available at Accessed 22 June 2018
  38. Zedner L (2007) Preventive justice or pre-punishment? The case of control orders. Curr Leg Probl 60(1):174–203. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations