Advertisement

A Brief Historical Overview of Curriculum in Early Childhood Care and Education

  • Jenny RitchieEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Across time and national boundaries, infants and young children grow and learn, mastering such huge accomplishments as mobility, language, and socialization within their particular cultural milieu. This chapter traces trajectories of early childhood education curriculum, firstly identifying some of the key European theorists who informed and invented curriculum and pedagogical systems for young children. It then considers how a curriculum of “guided participation” is enacted via informal education processes in traditional communities such as those of the Māori in New Zealand, in the 1930s, and Pukapuka in the northern Cook Islands, in the 1970s. Lastly, it provides some examples of a range of particularly influential curricula, some of which have intentionally worked toward countering dominant, universalizing western discourses. These include Montessori, Reggio Emilia, developmentally appropriate practice (DAP), Te Whāriki, Te Kōhanga Reo, the anti-bias curriculum, and outdoor early education programs. The chapter concludes by suggesting that there is much that can be learned from the study of the strengths and contributions of these various programs, historically and currently, which can inform our decisions about early childhood care and education which will sustain children, families, communities, and our planet, into the future.

Keywords

Early childhood Curriculum Guided participation Countering dominant discourses 

References

  1. Ariès P. Centuries of Childhood. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1960.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Government Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. Belonging, being and becoming. The early years learning framework for Australia. Barton: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/early-years-learning-framework.
  3. Bartolome LI. Beyond the methods fetish: toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harv Educ Rev. 1994;64(2):173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benton R. The Maori language. Dying or reviving? Wellington: NZCER; 1997. Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/The_Maori_Language_dying_reviving.pdf
  5. Benton R, Frame A, Meredith P. Te Mātāpunenga. A compendium of references to the concepts and institutions of Māori customary law. Wellington: Victoria University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Booze R, Greer C, Derman-Sparks L. Creating culturally consistent and inclusive early childhood programs for all children and families. Child Care Inf Exch. 1996;1:60–2.Google Scholar
  7. Borofsky R. Making history. Pukapukan and anthropological constructions of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu P, Passeron JC. Reproduction in education, society, and culture. London: Sage; 1990.Google Scholar
  9. Bowman B. Educating language minority children: challenges and opportunities. In: Kagan SL, editor. The care and education of America’s young children: obstacles and opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1991. p. 17–29.Google Scholar
  10. Bredekamp S. Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children; 1990.Google Scholar
  11. Bredekamp S, Copple C. Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programmes. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children; 1997.Google Scholar
  12. Cross T. The early childhood curriculum debate. In: Fleer M, editor. DAPcentrism: challenging developmentally appropriate practice. Watson: Australian Early Childhood Association; 1995. p. 87–108.Google Scholar
  13. Darder A. Culture and power in the classroom: a critical foundation for bicultural education. Westport: Bergin and Garvey; 1991.Google Scholar
  14. Derman-Sparks L, The A.B..C. Task Force. Anti-Bias curriculum. Tools for empowering young children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children; 1989.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey J. How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: DC Heath and Company; 1933.Google Scholar
  16. Eckhoff A, Spearman M. Rethink, reimagine, reinvent: the Reggio Emilia approach to incorporating reclaimed materials in children’s artworks. Art Educ. 2009;62(2):10–6.  https://doi.org/10.2307/27696325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edgerton JD, Roberts LW. Cultural capital or habitus? Bourdieu and beyond in the explanation of enduring educational inequality. Theory Res Educ. 2014;12(2):193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliott S, Chancellor B. From forest preschool to Bush Kinder: an inspirational approach to preschool provision in Australia. Australas J Early Childhood. 2014;39(4):45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farquhar S, Fleer M. Developmental colonisation of early childhood education in Aotearoa/New Zealand and Asutralia. In: Keesing-Styles L, Hedges H, editors. Theorising early childhood practice. Emerging dialogues. Castle Hill: Pademelon; 2007. p. 27–49.Google Scholar
  20. File N, Mueller JJ, Wisneski DB. Curriculum in early childhood education: re-examined, rediscovered, renewed. New York: Routledge; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foucault M. Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (Ed. Gordon C). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1980.Google Scholar
  22. Gonzalez-Mena J. Taking a culturally sensitive approach to infant-toddler programs. Young Child. 1992;47(2):4–18.Google Scholar
  23. Hyun E. Making sense of developmentally and culturally appropriate practice (DCAP) in early childhood education. New York: Peter Lang; 1998.Google Scholar
  24. Ingleby D. Development in social context. In: Richards M, Light P, editors. Children of social worlds. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1986. p. 297–317.Google Scholar
  25. Jipson J. Developmentally appropriate practice: culture, curriculum, connections. Early Educ Dev. 1991;2(2):120–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson R. Colonialism and cargo cults in early childhood education: does Reggio Emilia really exist? Contemp Issues Early Child. 2000;1(1):61–78.  https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2000.1.1.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jordan C. Translating culture: from ethnographic information to educational program. Anthropol Educ Q. 1985;16(2):105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jordan C. Creating cultures of schooling: historical and conceptual background of the KEEP/Rough Rock collaboration. Biling Res J. 1995;19(1):83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ladson-Billings G. But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Pract. 1995;34(3):159–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lascarides VC, Hinitz BF. History of early childhood education. New York: Routledge; 2011.Google Scholar
  31. Lubeck S. The Politics of developmentally appropriate practice: exploring issues of culture, class, and curriculum. In: Mallory BL, New RS, editors. Diversity & developmentally appropriate practices: challenges for early childhood education. New York: Teachers College Press; 1994. p. 17–43.Google Scholar
  32. Mac Naughton G. Shaping early childhood. Learners, curriculum and contexts. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  33. Mallory BL, New RS, editors. Diversity & developmentally appropriate practices. Challenges for early childhood education. New York: Teachers College Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  34. Mangione PL, Lally JR, Singer S. Essential connections: ten keys to culturally sensitive child care. Sacramento: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development; 1993.Google Scholar
  35. May H. The discovery of early childhood. Auckland: Bridget Williams Books/Auckland University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  36. May H. The discovery of early childhood. 2nd ed. Wellington: NZCER Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  37. May H, Kaur B, Prochner L. Empire, education, and indigenous childhoods. Nineteenth-century missionary infant schools in three British colonies. Abingson: Routledge; 2014.Google Scholar
  38. Montessori M. The Montessori method. Scientific pedagogy as applied to child education in “the children’s houses” with additions and revisions by the author (trans: George AE). London: William Heinemann; 1914.Google Scholar
  39. New Zealand Ministry of Education. Te Whāriki, draft guidelines for developmentally appropriate programmes in early childhood. Wellington: Learning Media; 1993.Google Scholar
  40. New Zealand Ministry of Education. Te Whāriki. He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa: early childhood curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media; 1996. Retrieved from https://education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Early-Childhood/Te-Whariki-1996.pdf.
  41. New Zealand Ministry of Education. Te Whāriki. He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa. Early childhood curriculum. Wellington: Ministry of Education; 2017.Google Scholar
  42. Nutbrown C, Clough P, Selbie P. Early childhood education. History, philosophy and experience. London: Sage; 2008.Google Scholar
  43. Nuttall J, editor. Weaving Te Whāriki. Aotearoa New Zealand’s early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice. Wellington: NZCER; 2003.Google Scholar
  44. O’Loughlin M. Appropriate for whom? A critique of the culture and class bias underlying Developmentally Appropriate Practice in early childhood education Paper presented at the 3rd Reconceptualizing early childhood education: research, theory, and practice conference: reclaiming the progressive agenda, Chicago; 1992.Google Scholar
  45. O’Loughlin M. If not ‘child development’, then what? Six propositions concerning children, their worlds, and the language we use to describe them Paper presented at the Reconceptualizing early childhood education: research, theory, and practice. Fifth interdisciplinary conference, Santa Rosa; 1995.Google Scholar
  46. Osborne B. Towards an ethnology of culturally responsive pedagogy in small-scale remote communities: Native American and Torres Strait Islander. Qual Stud Educ. 1991;4(1):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pere RR. AKO. Concepts and learning in the Māori tradition. Working paper no 17. Hamilton: Department of Sociology, University of Waikato; 1983.Google Scholar
  48. Prochner L. A hisotry of early childhood education in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  49. Rinaldi C. Dialogue with Reggio Emilia. London: Routledge; 2006.Google Scholar
  50. Rogoff B. The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  51. Salmond A. Two Worlds: first meetings between Mäori and Europeans, 1642–1772. Auckland: Viking; 1991.Google Scholar
  52. Smith LT. The colonisation of Māori children. Youth Law Rev, August/September/October. 1995:8–11.Google Scholar
  53. Soler J, Miller L. The struggle for early childhood curricula: a comparison of the English Foundation Stage Curriculum, Te Whāriki and Reggio Emilia. Int J Early Years Educ. 2003;11(1):57–68.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0966976032000066091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tribunal W. Report of the waitangi tribunal on the Te Reo Maori Claim (WAI 11). Wellington: GP Publications: Waitangi Tribunal; 1986. Retrieved from http://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/waitangi-tribunal
  55. UNESCO. Education for sustainable development goals. Learning objectives. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation; 2017. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf
  56. UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Project. Education for people and planet: creating sustainable futures for all. 2016. From http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002457/245752e.pdf
  57. Vejleskov H. Developmental psychology and early childhood education. Eur Early Child Educ Res J. 1999;7(1):23–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13502939985208301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Waite S, Bolling M, Bentsen P. Comparing apples and pears?: a conceptual framework for understanding learning through comparison of Engish Forest Schools and Danish udeskole. Environ Educ Res. 2016;22(6):868–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wisneski DB. “Silent voices of knowing” in the history of early childhood education and curriculum. In: File N, Mueller JJ, Wisneski DB, editors. Curriculum in early childhood education: rexamined, rediscovered, renewed. New York: Routledge; 2012. p. 3–13.Google Scholar
  60. Wolfe J. Learning from the past. Historical voices in early childhood education. Mayerthorpe: Piney Branch Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  61. Wood E, Hedges H. Curriculum in early childhood education: critical questions about content, coherence, and control. Curric J. 2016;27(3):387–405.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1129981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations